Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T08:44:53.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competition Policy in the Wine Industry in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2019

Andrea Minuto Rizzo
Andrea Minuto Rizzo*
Affiliation:
Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato, Piazza G. Verdi, 6/a, 00198 Rome, Italy; e-mail [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent years, several European antitrust authorities intervened in the wine sector to authorize mergers and acquisitions, provide opinions to governments, and ascertain anticompetitive agreements. This article analyzes these interventions in the context of an evolving regulatory framework. I draw conclusions about the direction of competition policy, in particular in relation to possible co-operations among various players in the wine industry. (JEL Classifications: K21, L40, L51)

Keywords

antitrustappellationscompetitionindustrial economicsregulation
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Wine Economics , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , February 2019 , pp. 90 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author thanks Karl Storchmann, an anonymous reviewer, Luca Arnaudo, Antonio Buttà, Salvatore Lamarca, Giulia Meloni, David Menival, and attendees at the 25th Annual European Association of Wine Economists (EuAWE) Conference in Dijon, France, for their helpful comments. This article is dedicated to Gabriella and Alessandro and their love for Villa de Toffoli in Soligo. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato.

References

Arnaudo, L. (2016). In vino auctoritas. L'industria vinicola tra consorziativismo e co-opetion. Mercato Concorrenza e Regole, 18(2), 313–328.Google Scholar
Ashenfelter, O. (2008). Predicting the prices and quality of Bordeaux wines. Economic Journal, 118(529), 40–53.Google Scholar
Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (2005). AS318 Disposizioni per la costituzione dei tavoli di filiera. Rome, 2 December. Available at http://www.agcm.it/dotcmsCustom/getDominoAttach?urlStr=192.168.14.10:8080/C12563290035806C/0/AB6E5A6C5F99172FC12570CE005A0891/$File/AS318.pdf.Google Scholar
Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (2012). C11799 Bolton Alimentari/Simmenthal. Rome, 5 December. Available at http://www.agcm.it/dotcmsCustom/getDominoAttach?urlStr=192.168.14.10:8080/41256297003874BD/0/DD8F5A0C10A9AFBDC1257AE10032CAFD/$File/p24102.pdf.Google Scholar
Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (2016). AS1266 Accordi relativi a prezzi di uve destinate alla produzione di vini DOCG e DOC. Rome, 22 March. Available at http://www.agcm.it/dotcmsCustom/getDominoAttach?urlStr=192.168.14.10:8080/C12563290035806C/0/72BEAECD814B0538C1257F7E0055BAFB/$File/AS1266.pdf.Google Scholar
Autorité de la Concurrence (2012). Décision n. 12-DCC-92 relative à l'acquisition de six sociétés du groupe Patriarche par la société Castel Frères SAS. Paris, 2 July. Available at http://www.autoritedelaconcurrence.fr/pdf/avis/12DCC92decision_version_publication.pdf.Google Scholar
Autorité de la Concurrence (2014a). Décision n. 14-DCC-21 relative à la prise de contrôle exclusive de la société Evoc par le groupe Val d'Orbieu. Paris, 17 February. Available at http://www.autoritedelaconcurrence.fr/pdf/avis/14DCC21decision_version_publication.pdf.Google Scholar
Autorité de la Concurrence (2014b). Décision n. 14-DCC-41 relative à la prise de contrôle conjoint d'actifs vinicoles par les sociétés Castel Frères et Domaines Listel. Paris, 24 March. Available at http://www.autoritedelaconcurrence.fr/pdf/avis/14DCC41decision_version_publication.pdf.Google Scholar
Autorité de la Concurrence (2018). Décision n. 18-D-06 relative à des pratiques mises en œuvre dans le secteur de la commercialisation des vins en vrac AOC des Côtes du Rhône. Paris, 23 May. Available at http://www.autoritedelaconcurrence.fr/pdf/avis/18d06.pdf.Google Scholar
Castriota, S. (2015). “L’informazione asimmetrica.” In S. Castriota, Economia del Vino (ch. 6), 187–219. Milan, Italy: Egea.Google Scholar
Comisión Nacional de la Competencia (2009). S/2779/07 Consejo Regulador de Denominación de origen Vinos de Jerez y Manzanilla de Sanlúcar. Madrid, 4 June. Available at https://www.cnmc.es/sites/default/files/36746_3.pdf.Google Scholar
Comisión Nacional de la Competencia (2010). S/0091/08 Vinos Finos de Jerez. Madrid, 28 July. Available at https://www.cnmc.es/sites/default/files/34371_6.pdf.Google Scholar
Comisión Nacional de la Competencia (2011). S/0091/08 Productores de Uva y Vinos de Jerez. Madrid, 6 October. Available at https://www.cnmc.es/sites/default/files/86308_6.pdf.Google Scholar
Comisión Nacional de la Competencia (2012). S/0305/10 Uvas D.O. Valdepeñas. Madrid, 29 November. Available at https://www.cnmc.es/sites/default/files/243611_6.pdf.Google Scholar
Comité Champagne (2019). Interprofessional history of the Champagne region – chronology. Available at https://www.champagne.fr/en/comite-champagne/about-us/history-of-the-champagne-wines-committee (accessed 24 February 2019).Google Scholar
Consejo Regulador de los Vinos de Jerez y Manzanilla (2008/2007/2006/2005/2004/2003/2002/2001). Memorias de Actividades, Jerez de la Frontera.Google Scholar
Council of the European Community (2004). Council regulation 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings. Brussels, 20 January. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0139&from=EN.Google Scholar
Council of the European Community (2008). Council regulation 479/2008 on the common organisation of the market in wine. Brussels, 29 April. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008R0479&from=EN.Google Scholar
Court of Justice of the European Union (2017). C-671/15 President of the Autorité de la Concurrence v Association des producteurs vendeurs (APVE) and Others. Luxembourg, 14 November. Available at http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=196626&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=149599.Google Scholar
Direttore della Direzione Agroalimentare della Regione Veneto (2016a). DOCG “Amarone della Valpolicella,” DOCG “Recioto della Valpolicella,” DOC “Valpolicella” e DOC “Valpolicella ripasso.” Sospensione iscrizione vigneti allo schedario viticolo veneto ai fini dell'idoneità alla rivendicazione per le campagne vitivinicole 2016/2017–2018/2019, Venice.Google Scholar
Direttore della Direzione Agroalimentare della Regione Veneto (2016b). Riserva vendemmiale prodotto atto ad essere designato con la DOC “Prosecco” proveniente dalla vendemmia 2016, Venice.Google Scholar
Direttore della Direzione Agroalimentare della Regione Veneto (2016c). DOCG “Amarone della Valpolicella” e DOCG “Recioto della Valpolicella.” Riduzione dei quantitativi ad ettaro classificabili per la vendemmia 2016, Venice.Google Scholar
Direttore della Direzione Agroalimentare della Regione Veneto (2017a). Svincolo del prodotto atto ad essere designato con la DOC “Prosecco” ottenuto dalla vendemmia 2016, posto in riserva vendemmiale, Venice.Google Scholar
Direttore della Direzione Agroalimentare della Regione Veneto (2017b). Riduzione dei quantitativi ad ettaro classificabili per la vendemmia 2017 della DOCG “Amarone della Valpolicella” e DOCG “Recioto della Valpolicella,” Venice.Google Scholar
Direttore della Sezione Competitività Sistemi Agroalimentari della Regione Veneto (2014). Stoccaggio del prodotto atto ad essere designato con la DOC “Prosecco” proveniente dalla vendemmia 2014, Venice.Google Scholar
Direttore della Sezione Competitività Sistemi Agroalimentari della Regione Veneto (2015a). Stoccaggio del prodotto atto ad essere designato con la DOC “Prosecco” proveniente dalla vendemmia 2014. Svincolo prodotto, Venice.Google Scholar
Direttore della Sezione Competitività Sistemi Agroalimentari della Regione Veneto (2015b). DOCG “Amarone della Valpolicella” e DOCG “Recioto della Valpolicella.” Riduzione dei quantitativi ad ettaro classificabili per la vendemmia 2015, Venice.Google Scholar
Dirigente Regionale della Sezione Competitività Sistemi Agroalimentari della Regione Veneto (2014). DOCG “Recioto della Valpolicella” e DOCG “Amarone della Valpolicella.” Riduzione dei quantitativi ad ettaro classificabili per la vendemmia 2014, Venice.Google Scholar
E-Bacchus (2018). Register of designations of origin and geographical indications protected in the EU in accordance with Regulation (EU) No. 1308/2013. Brussels. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/markets/wine/e-bacchus/index.cfm?event=pwelcome&language=EN.Google Scholar
European Commission (1994). IV/M.400 Allied Lyons/HWE-Pedro Domecq. Brussels, 28 April. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m400_en.pdf.Google Scholar
European Commission (1997). Commission notice on the definition of relevant market for the purposes of community competition law. Brussels, 9 December. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31997Y1209(01)&from=EN.Google Scholar
European Commission (2002). COMP/M.2941 CNP/Taittinger. Brussels, 16 October. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m2941_fr.pdf.Google Scholar
European Commission (2008). COMP/M.5114 Pernod Ricard/V&S. Brussels, 17 July. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m5114_20080717_20212_en.pdf.Google Scholar
European Commission (2011). COMP/M.6149 Suntory/Castel/GMdF/Savour Club/Maaf Subsidiaries, 31 March, Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission (2014a). Notice on agreements of minor importance which do not appreciably restrict competition under Article 101(1) of the TFEU (De Minimis Notice). Brussels, 30 August. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52014XC0830(01)&from=EN.Google Scholar
European Commission (2014b). Commission staff working document - Guidance on restrictions of competition “by object” for the purpose of defining which agreements may benefit from the de minimis notice. Brussels, 25 June. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/legislation/de_minimis_notice_annex_en.pdf.Google Scholar
European Commission (2016). Study on agricultural interbranch organisations in the EU, annex on national legislation and actions concerning IBOs: Italy. Brussels, 30 October. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/external-studies/2016-interbranch-organisations/fullrep.pdf.Google Scholar
European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2013). Regulation no. 1308/2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products. Brussels, 17 December. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013R1308&from=EN.Google Scholar
Farrell, J., and Shapiro, C. (2010). Antitrust evaluation of horizontal mergers: An economic alternative to market definition. Berkeley Electronic Journal of Theoretical Economics: Policies and Perspectives, 10(1), 1–41.Google Scholar
Il Corriere Vinicolo (2017). Il Vino in cifre, 90 (1), Editrice Unione Italiana Vini, Milan, 32–35.Google Scholar
Kaplow, L. (2010). Why (ever) define markets? Harvard Law Review, 124(2), 437–517.Google Scholar
Meloni, G., and Swinnen, J. (2013). The political economy of European wine regulations. Journal of Wine Economics, 8(3), 244–284.Google Scholar
Préfet de l'Aisne (2017/2016/2015/2014). Arrêté préfectoral relatif au prix du raisin servant au calcul des fermages pour les vendanges 2016/2015/2014/2013, Laon.Google Scholar
Préfet de l'Aube (2017/2016/2015/2014). Arrêté préfectoral relatif au prix du raisin servant au calcul des fermages pour les vendanges 2016/2015/2014/2013, Troyes.Google Scholar
Préfet de la Marne (2017/2016/2015/2014). Arrêté préfectoral relatif au prix du raisin servant au calcul des fermages pour les vendanges 2016/2015/2014/2013, Châlons-en-Champagne.Google Scholar
Préfet de la Haute-Marne (2017/2016/2015/2014). Arrêté préfectoral relatif au prix du raisin servant au calcul des fermages pour les vendanges 2016/2015/2014/2013, Chaumont.Google Scholar
Préfet de la Seine et Marne (2017/2016/2015/2014). Arrêté préfectoral relatif au prix du raisin servant au calcul des fermages pour les vendanges 2016/2015/2014/2013, Melun.Google Scholar
Sabbatini, P. (2012). Sulla (ir)rilevanza del mercato rilevante. Mercato concorrenza e regole, 14 (3) , 495–518.Google Scholar