Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:34:12.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Brokers as Experts in the French Wine Industry*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2012

M'hand Fares
Affiliation:
INRA (AGIR, UMR 1248) andUniversity of Paris 1, Centre INRA de Toulouse, BP 27. 31326 Castanet Tolosan Cedex, email: [email protected]

Abstract

The increasing industrialization of the wine supply chain is often associated with a greater vertical coordination. Our paper shows that a spot market institutional arrangement like brokerage can still be a relevant coordination mechanism to mitigate the contractual hazards due to quality problems. Indeed, a broker can be viewed as an expert that can help the merchant to monitor the grower's wine quality process. More precisely, if the merchant cannot credibly monitor the wine making process, it is Pareto improving to delegate this task to a broker. (JEL Classification: D82, L80, M12)

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archambaud, M. (2002). Les courtiers dans la région Languedoc-Roussillon. mimeo.Google Scholar
Baritaux, V., Aubert, M., Montaigne, E. and Remaud, H. (2006). Matchmakers in wine marketing channels: the case of French wine brokers. Agribusiness, 22, 375390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biglaiser, G. (1993). Middlemen as experts. RAND Journal of Economics, 24, 212223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biglaiser, G. and Friedman, J. (1994). Middlemen as guarantors of quality. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 12, 509531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisson, L. (2001). Factors influencing wine quality: what is wine quality? Working Paper, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Chambolle, C. and Saulpic, O. (2006). Growers vs. merchants bargaining on the price of Champagne grapes and the role of contracts when bargaining is unbalanced. Journal of Wine Economics, 1, 95113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chengyan, Y., Marette, S. and Berghin, J. (2006). How to promote quality perception in wine markets: brand advertising or geographical indication. Working Paper 06-WP426, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
De Fraja, G. (1999). After you sir: sequential investment as a solution to the hold-up problem. Games and Economic Behavior, 26, 2239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devesa, P. (1993). L'Opération de Courtage. Paris: Litec.Google Scholar
Diamond, D. (1984). Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. Review of Economic Studies, 51, 393414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fares, M. (2008). Playing with nested dolls: complementarity of contract forms in the winegrape supply industry, mimeo.Google Scholar
Faure-Grimaud, A. and Martimort, D. (1990). On some agency costs of intermediated contracting. Economics Letters, 71, 7582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, I. (2002). Contractual relations between wine grapes supply coordination and wineries in Australia: survey results. Australian Viticulture, 6, 6879.Google Scholar
Fraser, I. (2003). The role of contracts in wine grape supply coordination: an overview. Agribusiness Review, 11, 116.Google Scholar
Garella, P. (1989). Adverse selection and the middleman. Economica, 56, 395399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaucher, S., Soler, L.G. and Tangui, H. (2002). Incitation à la qualité dans la relation vignoble-négoce. Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, 62, 740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodhue, R., Heien, D., Lee, H. and Summer, D. (2003). Contracts and quality in the California winegrape industry. Review of Industrial Organization, 23, 267282.Google Scholar
Hackett, S. (1992). A comparative analysis of merchant and broker intermediation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 18, 299315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmström, B. (1979). Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 7481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lizzeri, A. (1999). Information revelation and certification intermediaries. RAND Journal of Economics, 30, 214231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAfee, R. and McMillan, J. (1995). Organizational diseconomies of scale. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 4: 399426.Google Scholar
Melumad, N., Mookherjee, D. and Reichelstein, S. (1992). A theory of responsibility centers. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15, 445484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mookherjee, D. (2006). Decentralization, hierarchies and incentives: a mechanism design perspective. Journal of Economic Literature, 44, 367390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onivins, (1999). La réglementation des courtiers en vins. Onivins – Infos, 67, 8290.Google Scholar
Orth, U.R., Krška, P. (2002). Quality signals in wine marketing: the role of exhibition awards. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 4, 385397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogerson, W. (1985). The first order approach to principal-agent problems. Econometrica, 53, 13571367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, A. and Wolinsky, A. (1987). Middlemen. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102, 581593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salanié, R. (2005). The Economics of Contracts: A Primer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Spulber, D. (1996). Market microstructure and intermediation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 135152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spulber, D. (1999). Market Microstructure: Intermediaries and the Theory of the Firm. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirole, J. (1992). Collusion and the theory of organizations. In Laffont, J.J. (ed.), Advances in Economic Theory I. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yanelle, M.-O. (1989). The strategic analysis of intermediation. European Economic Review, 33, 294301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yavas, A. (1994a). Economics of brokerage: an overview. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 2, 169195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yavas, A. (1994b). Middlemen in bilateral search markets. Journal of Labor Economics, 12, 406429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar