Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T08:12:11.753Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of Chinese names in identity formation: a primer for psychoanalysts and psychotherapists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2013

Ronald Teague
Ronald Teague*
Affiliation:
California School of Professional Psychology at Alliant International University Sacramento
*
address for correspondence: Ronald Teague, Clinical PsyD Program, California School of Professional Psychology at Alliant International University, 2030 West El Camino Ave. Suite 200, Sacramento, CA 95833. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There have been many important psychoanalytic studies on the importance of names on the development of identity. None of these studies, however, have specifically examined Chinese names and their effect on development of identity in Chinese patients. Chinese names differ in many important ways from names used in Western cultures. This paper provides a basic description of the nature, structure and meaning of Chinese names and suggests ways that these names help form a sense of identity in the Chinese.

Keywords

Chinese namestranscultural psychologyidentitycross-culturalChinapsychoanalysis
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Tropical Psychology , Volume 3 , 2013 , e3
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Australian Academic Press Pty Ltd 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, C.F., & Liu Levy, H. (1992). A guide to Chinese names. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 10–15.Google Scholar
Barron, G.C. (2006). What's in a name: What analyst and patient call each other. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 54, 903–917.Google Scholar
De Levita, D.J. (1966). On the Psycho-analytic comcept of identity. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 47, 299–305.Google Scholar
Ellis, A., & Beechley, R.M. (1954). Emotional disturbance in children with peculianr given names. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 85, 337–339.Google Scholar
Falk, A. (1975–76). Identity and name changes. Psychoanalytic Reveiw, 62, 647–657.Google ScholarPubMed
Feldman, H. (1959). The problem of personal names as universal element in culture. American Imago, 16, 237–250.Google Scholar
Flugel, I. (1930). On the significance of names. British Journal of Medical Psychology, X, 208–213.Google Scholar
Golden, P.R. (2000). Personal names in early China: A research note. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 120 (1), 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. (1997). Chinese names: The traditions surrounding the use of Chinese surnames and personal names. Kelana Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia: Pelanduk Publications (M) Sdn. Bhd.Google Scholar
Koole, S.L., & Pelham, B.W. (2009). On the nature of implicit self-esteem: The case of the name letter effect. In Spencer, S., & Fein, S. Z., Motivated Social Perception. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Murphy, W.F. (1957). A note on the significance of names. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 26, 91–106.Google Scholar
Ning, Y., & Ning, Y. (1995). Chinese Personal Names: The art of creating them. Singapore: Federal Publications.Google Scholar
Savage, B., & Wells, F. (1948). A note on singurality in given names. Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 271–272.Google Scholar
Wostyn, J. (2004 йил 2 September). What's in a name? Beijing Review, 48–49.Google Scholar
Xu, Z., & Nicolson, D.H. (1992). Don't abbreviate Chinese names. Taxon, 41, 499–503.Google Scholar