Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:38:07.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two-year study of male orchid bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossini) attraction to chemical baits in lowland south-eastern Perú

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

David L. Pearson
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, 208 Mueller Lab., The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
Robert L Dressler
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 2072, Balboa, Panamaâ

Abstract

Chemical baits corresponding to natural orchid fragrance chemicals were used to attract and sample male orchid bees in terra firme and flood plain forest sites on the Tambo-pata Reserve in south-eastern Perú. The study was conducted monthly for two years. A total of 38 species of bees was collected at these chemical baits, and although most species were collected from both habitats, 11 species were significantly more common in one habitat than the other. There was considerable variation in the number and types of chemicals to which each of the orchid bee species was attracted.

Two cycles of seasonal abundance occurred annually in the number of orchid bee individuals and species collected at the chemical baits. A major peak occurred a month following onset of the wet season, and a minor peak occurred during the dry season. Species body size was related to seasonal activity, but additional factors such as flowering phenology and nest parasites were also probably involved.

The number of orchid bee species found on the Tambopata Reserve was similar to the number found in forest sites of eastern and central Brazil, Costa Rica, and Panamá. This homogeneity in species richness is in marked contrast to other insect groups such as Odonata, Lepi-doptera, Asilidae (Diptera), Tabanidae (Diptera), and Cicindelidae (Coleoptera), for which the species numbers recorded on the Tambopata Reserve are the highest for any similar sized area in the world.

Resumen

Machos de abejas de orquídeas fueron atraídos y capturados usando atrayentes químicos parecidos a la fragancia natural de orquídeas en sitios de bosque inundable y de tierra firme de la Zona Reservada de Tambopata del sureste del Peru. En total se colectaron 38 especies de abejas atraídas a los atrayentes químicos en ambos sitios, de las cuales 11 especies fueron significativamente mas comunes en uno de los habitats que en el otro. Se encontró una gran variación en el número y tipos de atrayentes químicos que atrayeron a las abejas.

Dos ciclos estacionales en la abundacia de individuos y de especies de abejas fueron detectados usando los atrayentes químicos. El mayor pico ocurrio al cabo del primer mes de la estación lluviosa, y el menor durante la estaci´on seca. El tamano individual por especies estuvo asociado con la actividad estacional, aunque otros factores como la fenología floral y los parasitoides también pudieron haber estado involucrados.

El número de especies de abejas encontrado en la Zona Reservada de Tambopata fue similar al encontrado en otras zonas boscosas de centro y este de Brasil, en Costa Rica y Panamá. Esta homogeneidad en la riqueza de especies contrasta notablemente con otros grupos de insectos, tales como Odonata, Lepidoptera, Asilidae (Diptera), Tabanidae (Diptera) y Cicindelidae (Coleoptera), en cuanto a que los números de especies encontrados en la Zona Reservada de Tambopata son los mayores del mundo, cuando se comparan áreas de tamaño similar.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Ackerman, J. D. 1981. The phenological relationships of male euglossine bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and their orchid fragrance hosts. Ph.D. dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.Google Scholar
Ackerman, J. D. 1983a. Diversity and seasonality of male euglossine bees (Hymenoptera:Apidae) in central Panamá Ecology 64:274283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, J. D. 1983b. Specificity and mutual dependency of the orchid-euglossine bee interaction. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 20:301314.Google Scholar
Casey, T. M., MAY, M. L. & Morgan, K. R. 1985. Flight energetics of euglossine bees in relation to morphology and wing strike frequency. Journal of Experimental Biology. In press.Google Scholar
Dressler, R. L. 1982. Biology of the orchid bees (Euglossini). Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13:373394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, R. L. 1985. Euglossine bees (Hymenoptera:Apidae) of the Tambopata Reserved Zone, Madre de Dios, Perú. Revista Peruana de Entomologia. In press.Google Scholar
Fisher, E. M. 1985. A preliminary list of the robber flies (Diptera:Asilidae) of the Tambopata Reserved Zone, Madre de Dios, Perú. Revista Peruana de Entomologia. In press.Google Scholar
Frankie, G. W., Baker, H. G. & Opler, P. A 1974. Comparative phenological studies of trees in tropical wet and dry forests in the lowlands of Costa Rica. Journal of Ecology 62:881919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haffer, J. 1969. Speciation in Amazonian forest birds. Science 165:131137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janzen, D. H. 1981a. Bee arrival at two Costa Rican female Catasetum orchid inflorescences, and a hypothesis on euglossine population structure. Oikos 36:177183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, D. H. 1981b. Reduction in euglossine bee species richness on Isla del Caño, a Costa Rican off-shore island. Biotropica 13:238240.Google Scholar
Janzen, D. H., Devries, P. J., Higgins, M. L. & Kimsey, L. S. 1982. Seasonal and site variation in Costa Rican euglossine bees at chemical baits in lowland deciduous and evergreen forests. Ecology 63:6674.Google Scholar
Kimsey, L. S. 1980. The behaviour of male orchid bees (Apidae, Hymenoptera, Insecta) and the question of leks. Animal Behaviour 28:9961004.Google Scholar
Lamas, G. 1981. La fauna de mariposas de la Reserva de Tambopata, Madre de Dios, Perú. Revista de la Sociedad Mexicana de Lepidoptera 6:2340.Google Scholar
Lamas, G. 1983. Adiciones y correcciones a la lista de mariposas de la Reserva de Tambopata, Perú Revista de la Sociedad Mexican de Lepidoptera 8:13–24.Google Scholar
May, M. L. & Casey, T. M. 1983. Thermoregulation and heat exchange in euglossine bees. Physiological Zoology 56:541551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulson, D. R. 1985. The Odonata of the Tambopata Reserved Zone, Madre de Dios, Perú Revista Peruana de Entomologia. In press.Google Scholar
Pearson, D. L 1985. The tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) of the Tambopata Reserved Zone, Madre de Dios, Perú. Revista Peruana de Entomologia. In press.Google Scholar
Prance, G. T. 1982. Biological diversification in the tropics. Columbia University Press, New York. 714 pp.Google Scholar
Ricklefs, R. E., Adams, R. M. & Dressler, R. L. 1969. Species diversity of Euglossa in Panama Ecology 50:713716.Google Scholar
Wilkerson, R. & Fairchild, G. B. 1985. A list of the Tabanidae (Diptera) of Perú with special reference to the Tambopata Reserved Zone, Madre de Dios. Revista Peruana de Entomologia. In press.Google Scholar
Williams, N. H. 1983. Orchids and euglossine bees. Pp. 121169 in Arditti, J. (ed.). Orchid Biology II. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar