Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:52:36.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Successional trends in soil seed banks of abandoned pastures of a Neotropical dry region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2010

Susana Maza-Villalobos ,
Celina Lemus-Herrera  and
Miguel Martínez-Ramos
Susana Maza-Villalobos
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro # 8701, Col. Ex-Hacienda de San José de la Huerta, CP 58190, Morelia, Michoacán, México
Celina Lemus-Herrera
Affiliation:
Facultad de Biología, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Ciudad Universitaria Av. Fco. J. Múgica S/N., CP 58030, Morelia, Michoacán, México
Miguel Martínez-Ramos*
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro # 8701, Col. Ex-Hacienda de San José de la Huerta, CP 58190, Morelia, Michoacán, México
*
1Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

A chronosequence was used to study seed-bank communities during the first 12 y of tropical-dry-forest regeneration in abandoned pastures in Chamela, Mexico. Prediction that seeds of woody species replace those of herbaceous species during succession was tested and mechanisms of species replacement (facilitation, tolerance, inhibition) were assessed. Four successional categories (three sites each) were considered: pasture (0–1 y since abandonment), early (3–5 y), intermediate (10–12 y), and old-growth forest. At the end of the dry season, 20 cylindrical soil samples (10 cm diameter, 15 cm depth) were randomly obtained within a 20 × 50-m plot in each site. Seeds ≥1 mm were counted and identified. Overall, 2941 seeds and 102 morphospecies (52 taxonomically identified) were recorded. Seed bank density reduced, species diversity remained fairly constant and seeds of herbaceous species were replaced by those of woody species over the chronosequence. A clear species-by-species replacement pattern was detected, as expected under a mechanism of succession by facilitation. Twelve years after abandonment, a diverse seed bank of woody species did exist, indicating a fast recovery of the tropical-dry-forest regenerative potential; nonetheless, the structure and composition of the seed bank was still different from that in the old-growth forest.

Keywords

Chamela–CuixmalachronosequenceMexiconatural regenerationregenerative communitiessecondary successiontropical dry forest
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 35 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ÁLVAREZ-BUYLLA, E. & MARTÍNEZ-RAMOS, M. 1990. Seed bank versus seed rain in the regeneration of a tropical pioneer tree. Oecologia 84:314–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
AUSTIN, P. M. 2005. Use of ordination and other multivariate descriptive methods to study succession. Plant Ecology 35:165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AVILA-CABADILLA, L. D., STONER, K. E., HENRY, M. L. & ALVAREZ-AÑORVE, M. Y. 2009. Composition, structure and diversity of phyllostomid bat assemblages in different successional stages of a tropical dry forest. Forest Ecology and Management 258:986–996.Google Scholar
BARRADAS, V. L. 1991. Radiation regime in a tropical dry deciduous forest in western Mexico. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 44:57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BASKIN, J. M. & BASKIN, C. C. 1985. The annual dormancy cycle in buried weed seeds: a continuum. Bioscience 35:492–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BAZZAZ, F. A. 1975. Plant species diversity in old-field successional ecosystems in southern Illinois. Ecology 56:485–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BAZZAZ, F. A. 1996. Plants in changing environments: linking physiological, population, and community ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 320 pp.Google Scholar
BEKKER, R. M., VERWEIJ, G. L., BAKKER, J. P. & FRESCO, L. F. M. 2001. Soil seed bank dynamics in hayfield succession. Journal of Ecology 88:594–607.Google Scholar
BRIONES-SALAS, M., SÁNCHEZ-CORDERO, V. & SÁNCHEZ-ROJAS, V. 2006. Multi-species fruit and seed removal in a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. Canadian Journal of Botany 84:433–442.Google Scholar
BULLOCK, S. H. 1995. Plant reproduction in neotropical dry forest. Pp. 277–296 in Bullock, S. H., Mooney, H. A. & Medina, E. (eds.). Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 450 pp.Google Scholar
BULLOCK, S. H. & SOLÍS-MAGALLANES, J. A. 1990. Phenology of canopy trees of a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico.Biotropica 22:22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BURGOS, A. & MAASS, J. M. 2004. Vegetation change associated with land-use in tropical dry Forest areas of Western Mexico. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 104:475–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BUTLER, B. J. & CHAZDON, R. L. 1998. Species richness, spatial variation, and abundance of the soil seed bank of a secondary tropical dry forest. Biotropica 30:214–222.Google Scholar
CECCON, E., HUANTE, P. & RINCÓN, E. 2006. Abiotic factors influencing tropical dry forests regeneration. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 49:305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHAO, A., CHAZDON, R. L., COLWELL, R. K. & TSUNG-JEN, S. 2005. A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data.Ecology Letters 8:148–159.Google Scholar
CHAZDON, R. L., LETCHER, S. G., VAN BREUGEL, M., MARTÍNEZ-RAMOS, M., BONGERS, F. & FINEGAN, B. 2007. Rates of change in tree communities of secondary Neotropical forests following major disturbances. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 362:273–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CONDIT, R., ASHTON, P. S., BAKER, P., BUNYAVEJCHEWIN, S., GUNATILLEKE, S., GUNATILLEKE, N., HUBBELL, S. P., FOSTER, R. B., ITOH, A., LAFRANKIE, J. V., LEE, H. S., LOSOS, E., MANOKARAN, N., SUKUMAR, R. & YAMAKURA, T. 2000. Spatial patterns in the distribution on tropical tree species.Science 5470:1414–1418.Google Scholar
CONNELL, J. H. & SLATYER, R. O. 1977. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. American Naturalist 111:1119–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DALLING, J. W. & DENSLOW, J. S. 1998. Soil seed bank composition along a forest chronosequence in seasonally moist tropical forest, Panama. Journal of Vegetation Science 9:669–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DIRZO, R., MOONEY, H., CEBALLOS, G. & YOUNG, H. 2010. Seasonally dry tropical forests: biology and conservation. Island Press, in press.Google Scholar
DUPUY, J. M. & CHAZDON, R. L. 1998. Long-term effects of forest regrowth and selective logging on the seed bank of tropical forests in NE Costa Rica. Biotropica 30:223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FENNER, M. 1985. Seed ecology. Chapman and Hall, London. 151 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FOSTER, S. A. 1986. On the adaptive value of large seeds for tropical moist forest trees: a review and synthesis. Botanical Review 52:260–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GARWOOD, N. C. 1989. Tropical soil seed banks. Pp. 149–209 in Leck, M. A., Parker, V. T. & Simpson, R. L. (eds.). Ecology of soil seed banks. Academic Press, San Diego. 462 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GENTRY, A. H. 1995. Diversity and floristic composition of neotropical dry forest. Pp. 146–190 in Bullock, S. H., Mooney, H. A. & Medina, E. (eds). Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 450 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GONZÁLEZ-RIVAS, B., TIGABU, M., CASTRO-MARÍN, G. & ODÉN, P. C. 2009. Soil seed bank assembly following secondary succession on abandoned agricultural fields in Nicaragua. Journal of Forestry Research 20:349–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GREENE, D. F., QUESADA, M. & Calogeropoulos, C. 2008. Dispersal of seeds by tropical sea breeze. Ecology 89:118–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GROMBONE-GUARATINI, M. T. & RODRIGUES, R. R. 2002. Seed bank and seed rain in a seasonal semi-deciduous forest in south-eastern Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology 18:759–774.Google Scholar
HOLL, K. D. 1999. Factors limiting tropical rain forest regeneration in abandoned pasture: seed rain, seed germination, microclimate, and soil. Biotropica 31:229–242.Google Scholar
HUBBELL, S. P. 1979. Tree dispersion, abundance, and diversity in a tropical dry forest. Science 4387:1299–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HYATT, L. A. & CASPER, B. B. 2000. Seed bank formation during early secondary succession in a temperate deciduous forest. Biotropica 88:516–527.Google Scholar
IZÁK, J. 2006. Some practical aspects of fitting and testing the Zipf–Mandelbrot model. Scientometrics 67:107–120.Google Scholar
JANZEN, D. H. 1981. Patterns of herbivory in tropical deciduous forest. Biotropica 13:271–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JANZEN, D. H. 1988. Management of habitat fragments in a tropical dry forest: growth. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 75:105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JOHNSON, E. A. & MIYANISHI, K. 2008. Testing the assumptions of chronosequences in succession. Ecology Letters 11:419–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KHURANA, E. & SINGH, J. S. 2001. Ecology of seed and seedling growth for conservation and restoration of tropical dry forest: a review. Environmental Conservation 28:39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEBRIJA-TREJOS, E., BONGERS, F., PÉREZ-GARCÍA, E. A. & MEAVE, J. A. 2008. Successional change and resilence of a very dry tropical deciduous forest following shifting agriculture. Biotropica 40:422–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEMENIH, M. & TEKETAY, D. 2006. Changes in soil seed bank composition and density following deforestation and subsequent cultivation of a tropical dry Afromontane forest in Ethiopia. Tropical Ecology 47:1–12.Google Scholar
LYARUU, H. V., ELIAPENDA, S. & BACKÉUS, I. 2000. Floristic, structural and seed bank diversity of a dry Afromontane forest at Mafai, central Tanzania. Biodiversity and Conservation 9:241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAGURRAN, A. E. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Wiley–Blackwell, Oxford. 256 pp.Google Scholar
MARTINS, A. M. & ENGEL, L. V. 2007. Soil seed banks in tropical forest fragments with different disturbance histories in southeastern Brazil. Ecological Engineering 31:165–174.Google Scholar
MILLER, P. M. 1999. Effects of deforestation seed banks in a tropical deciduous forest of western México. Journal of Tropical Ecology 95:179–788.Google Scholar
QUESADA, M., SÁNCHEZ-AZOFEIFA, G. A., ÁLVAREZ-AÑORVE, M., STONER, K. E., ÁVILA-CABADILLA, L., CALVO-ALVARADO, J., CASTILLO, A., ESPÍRITO-SANTO, M. M., FAGUDES, M., FERNANDES, G. W., GAMON, J., LOPEZARAIZA-MIKEL, M., LAWRENCE, D., MORELLATO, L. P. C., POWERS, J. S., NEVES, F. S., ROSAS-GUERRERO, V., SAGAYO, R. & SÁNCHEZ-MONTOYA, G. 2009. Succession and management of tropical dry forests in the Americas: review and new perspectives. Forest Ecology and Management 258:1014–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RICO-GRAY, V. & GARCÍA-FRANCO, J. 1992. Vegetation and soil seed bank of successional stages in tropical lowland deciduous forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 3:617–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROBERTS, T. L. & VANKAT, J. L. 1991. Floristic of a chronosequences corresponding to old field–deciduous forest succession in southwestern Ohio. II. Seed banks. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 118:377–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROMERO-DUQUE, L. P., JARAMILLO, V. J. & PÉREZ-JIMÉNEZ, A. 2007. Structure and diversity of secondary tropical dry forests in Mexico, differing in their prior land-use history. Forest Ecology and Management 253:38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SÁNCHEZ-AZOFEIFA, G. A., QUESADA, M., CUEVAS-REYES, P., CASTILLO, A. & SÁNCHEZ-MONTOYA, G. 2009. Land cover and conservation in the area of influence of the Chamela–Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management 258:907–912.Google Scholar
SEGURA, G., BALVANERA, P., DURÁN, E. & PÉREZ, A. 2004. Tree community structure and stem mortality along a water availability gradient in a Mexican tropical dry forest. Plant Ecology 169:259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SIMPSON, R. L., LECK, M. A. & PARKER, V. T. 1989. Seed banks: general concepts and methodological Issues. Pp. 3–8 in Leck, M. A., Parker, V. T. & Simpson, R. L. (eds.). Ecology of soil seed banks. Academic Press, San Diego. 462 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VIEIRA, D. L. M. & SCARIOT, A. 2006. Principles of natural regeneration of tropical dry forest for restoration. Restoration Ecology 14:11–20.Google Scholar
WILLS, T. J. & READ, J. 2007. Soil seed bank dynamic in post-fire heathland succession in south-eastern Australia. Plant Ecology 190:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar