Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:13:19.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial organization of a bromeliad community in the Atlantic rainforest, south-eastern Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Erich A. Fischer  and
Andrea C. Araujo
Erich A. Fischer
Affiliation:
PG-Ecologia, Departamento de Botânica, Caixa Postal 6109, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 13081–970 Campinas, São Paulo, Brasil
Andrea C. Araujo
Affiliation:
PG-Ecologia, Departamento de Botânica, Caixa Postal 6109, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 13081–970 Campinas, São Paulo, Brasil
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The habit, shade-tolerance and dispersal agent of 19 bromeliad species were studied in a rainforest community in order to relate specific traits to the spatial occurrence of the species. Highest density was found in riparian forest (RF), followed by restinga scrub (RE), rocky shore (RS) and dense canopy forest (DF). Terrestrial bromeliads occurred in open sites (RE and RS), epiphytes were absent in RS and facultative species occupied all four habitats. Bird-dispersed bromeliads occurred in the upper canopy, whereas those dispersed by mammals were low in the forest profile. Bromeliads which are dispersed by similar fauna fruit sequentially through the year. Differences in traits may allow the sharing of habitats and strata among species.

Keywords

Bromeliaceaecommunitydispersal agentepiphytesfruiting seasonhabitrainforestresource partitioningspatial distribution
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , November 1995 , pp. 559 - 567
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Araujo, A. C., Fischer, E. A. & Sazima, M. 1994. Floraçāo sequencial e polinizaçāo de três espécies de Vriesta (Bromeliaceae) na regiāo de Juréia, sudeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 17:113–118.Google Scholar
Augspurger, C. K. 1986. Morphology and dispersal potential of wind-dispersed diaspores of neotropical trees. American Journal of Botany 73:353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benzing, D. H. 1980. The biology of the bromeliads. Mad River Press. California.Google Scholar
Benzing, D. H. 1987. Vascular epiphytism: taxonomic participation and adaptive diversity. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 74:183–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benzing, D. H. 1990. Vascular epiphytes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergallo, H. G. 1991. Dinâmica populacional, área de vida, parasitismo e mutualismo de pequenos mamíferos da Estaçāo Ecológica da Juréia, SP. MS Dissertation. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas.Google Scholar
Burrows, F. M. 1975. Wind-borne seed and fruit movement. New Phytologist 75:405–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlgren, R. M. T., Clifford, H. T. & Yeo, P. F. 1985. The families of monocotyledons. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmons, L. H. & Feer, F. 1990. Neotropical rainforest mammals: a field guide. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Fischer, E. A. 1994. Fenologia, polinizaçāo e distribuiçāo espacial de Bromeliaceae numa comunidade de Mata Atlântica, litoral sul de Sāo Paulo. MS Dissertation. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas.Google Scholar
Fontoura, T., Costa, A. & Wendt, T. 1991. Preliminary checklist of the Bromeliaceae of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Selbyana 12:5–45.Google Scholar
Gentry, A. H. & Dodson, C. H. 1987. Diversity and biogeography of neotropical vascular epiphytes. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 74:205–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, D. F. & Johnson, E. A. 1989. A model of wind dispersal of winged or plumed seeds. Ecology 70:339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, H. & Smith, J. A. C. 1983. Photosynthetic pathways in the Bromeliaceae of Trinidad: relations between life-forms, habitat preference and the occurrence of CAM. Oecologia 60:176–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guerrazzi, M. C. 1991. Influência de fatores abióticos na distribuição de duos espécies de gastrópodos herbívoros na regiāo entre marés, na Estaçāo Ecológica de Juréia-Itatins, SP. MS Dissertation. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas.Google Scholar
Hubbell, S. P. 1979. Tree dispersion, abundance, and diversity in a tropical dry forest. Science 203:1299–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, D. H. 1983. Dispersal of seeds by vertebrate guts. Pp. 232–262 in Futuyma, D. J. & Slatkin, M. (eds). Coevolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Malcolm, J. R. 1991. Comparative abundances of neotropical small mammals by trap height. Journal of Mammalogy 72:188–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medina, E. 1974. Dark CO2 fixation, habitat preference and evolution within the Bromeliaceae. Evolution 28:677–686.Google ScholarPubMed
Paixāo, I. L. S. C. 1984. Estação Ecológica da Juréia. Secretaria Especial do Meio Ambiente, Distrito Federal, Brazil.Google Scholar
Pittendrigh, C. S. 1948. The bromeliad-anopheles-malaria complex in Trinidad. I – The bromeliad flora. Evolution 2:58–89.Google ScholarPubMed
Reitz, R. 1983. Bromeliáceas e a malária-bromélia endêmica. Herbário ‘Barbosa Rodrigues’, Itajaí.Google Scholar
Schoener, T. W. 1986. Resource partitioning. Pp. 91–126 in Kikkawa, J. & Anderson, D. J. (eds). Community ecology: pattern and process. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
Snow, D. W. 1966. A possible selection factor in the evolution of fruiting species in a tropical forest. Oikos 15:274–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, B. K. & Snow, D. W. 1971. The feeding ecology of tanagers and honeycreepers in Trinidad. The Auk 88:291–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, J. K. & Olmsted, I. C. 1992. Host tree utilization by vascular epiphytes in a seasonally inundated forest (Tintal) in Mexico. Biotropica 24:402–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar