Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:09:19.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seed dispersal by rodents in a lowland forest in central Panama

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2015

Jacob W. Dittel ,
Thomas D. Lambert  and
Gregory H. Adler
Jacob W. Dittel*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Wisconsin – Oshkosh, Oshkosh WI 54901, USA Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology, Department of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA
Thomas D. Lambert
Affiliation:
Biology Department, Frostburg State University, 101 Braddock Road, Frostburg MD 21532, USA
Gregory H. Adler
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Wisconsin – Oshkosh, Oshkosh WI 54901, USA
*
1Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

We studied the removal of seeds of three species of large-seeded tree (Astrocaryum standleyanum, Attalea butyracea and Dipteryx oleifera) from three different heights within six study plots in a lowland forest in central Panama. Fresh fruits with intact seeds fitted with industrial sewing bobbins were placed within semi-permeable exclosures. Removed seeds were tracked to deposition sites, and seed fate was determined. Removals were likely perpetrated by two small rodents, the strictly terrestrial Proechimys semispinosus and the scansorial Sciurus granatensis, because they were the most abundant small rodents in the study site during the study period and were of sufficient size to remove large seeds. Rodent abundance and fruit availability were estimated by conducting censuses. Nine microhabitat variables were measured at each deposition site to determine if these two rodents were preferentially depositing seeds in sites with certain characteristics or were randomly depositing seeds. During the study, rodents handled 98 seeds, 85 of which were not predated upon and could potentially germinate. Removal rates were not influenced by rodent abundance or fruit availability. Seeds were most frequently moved <3 m and deposited with the fruit eaten and the seed intact. However, some seeds did experience relatively long-distance dispersal (>10 m). Rodents preferentially deposited seeds in locations with large logs (>10 cm diameter), dense herbaceous cover, and an intact canopy. The number of large logs was different from random locations. Despite not being able to determine long-term fate (greater than c. 1 y), we show that these small rodents are not primarily seed predators and may in fact be important mutualists by dispersing seeds relatively long distances to favourable germination sites.

Keywords

Astrocaryum standleyanumAttalea butyraceaPanamaProechimys semispinosusred-tailed squirrelSciurus granatensisseed dispersalseed predationspiny rat
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 31 , Issue 5 , September 2015 , pp. 403 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ADLER, G. H. 1994. Tropical forest fragmentation and isolation promote asynchrony among populations of a frugivorous rodent. Journal of Animal Ecology 63:903–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ADLER, G. H. 1995. Fruit and seed exploitation by Central American spiny rats, Proechimys semispinosus. Studies on Neotropical Fauna & Environment 30:237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ADLER, G. H. 1996. The island syndrome in isolated populations of a tropical forest rodent. Oecologia 108:694–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ADLER, G. H. 1998. Impacts of resource abundance on populations of a tropical forest rodent. Ecology 79:242–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ADLER, G. H. 2000. Tropical tree diversity, forest structure, and the demography of a frugivorous rodent, the spiny rat (Proechimys semispinosus). Journal of Zoology 250:57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ADLER, G. H. & KESTELL, D. W. 1998. Fates of neotropical tree seeds influenced by spiny rats (Proechimys semispinosus). Biotropica 30:677–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ADLER, G. H., TOMBLIN, D. C. & LAMBERT, T. D. 1998. Ecology of two species of echimyid rodents (Hoplomys gymnurus and Proechimys semispinosus) in central Panama. Journal of Tropical Ecology 14:711–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASQUITH, N. M., WRIGHT, S. J. & CLAUSS, M. J. 1997. Does mammal community composition control recruitment in neotropical forests? Evidence from Panama. Ecology 78:941–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BECK, H. & TERBORGH, J. 2002. Groves versus isolates: how spatial aggregation of Astrocaryum murumuru palms affects seed removal. Journal of Tropical Ecology 18:275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BECK, H., GAINES, M. S., HINES, J. E. & NICHOLS, J. D. 2004. Comparative dynamics of small mammal populations in treefall gaps and surrounding understorey within Amazonian rainforest. Oikos 106:27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BROWN, J. S. 1988. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 22:37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BROWN, J. S., KOTLER, B. P., SMITH, R. J. & WIRTZ, W. O. 1988. The effects of owl predation on the foraging behavior of heteromyid rodents. Oecologia 76:408–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CARVAJAL, A. & ADLER, G. H. 2008. Seed dispersal and predation by Proechimys semispinosus and Sciurus granatensis in gaps and understorey in central Panama. Journal of Tropical Ecology 24:485–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CINTRA, R. 1997. A test of Janzen–Connell model with two common tree species in Amazonian forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 13:641–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CLARK, D. A. & CLARK, D. B. 1984. Spacing dynamics of a tropical rain forest tree: evaluation of the Janzen–Connell model. American Naturalist 124:769–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CLARK, J. S., SILMAN, M., KERN, R., MACKLIN, E. & HILLERISLAMBERS, J. 1999. Seed dispersal near and far: patterns across temperate and tropical forests. Ecology 80:1475–1494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FLAGEL, D., ADLER, G. H. & LAMBERT, T. D. 2009. Influence of seed height on removal rates by rodents in central Panama. Mammalia 73:76–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FORGET, P.-M. 1991a. Scatterhoarding of Astrocaryum paramaca by Proechimys in French Guiana: comparisons with Myoprocta exilis. Tropical Ecology 32:155–167.Google Scholar
FORGET, P.-M. 1991b. Comparative recruitment patterns of two non-pioneer canopy tree species in French Guiana. Oecologia 85:434–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FORGET, P.-M. & MILLERON, T. 1991. Evidence for secondary seed dispersal by rodents in Panama. Oecologia 87:596–599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FORGET, P.-M., MUNOZ, E. & LEIGH, E. G. 1994. Predation by rodents and bruchid beetles on seeds of Scheelea palms on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Biotropica 26:420–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GLANZ, W. E. 1984. Food and habitat use by two sympatric Sciurus species in central Panama. Journal of Mammalogy 65:342–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GLANZ, W. E., THORINGTON, R. W., GIACALONE-MADDEN, J. & HEANEY, L. R. 1982. Seasonal food use and demographic trends in Sciurus granatensis. Pp. 239–251 in Leigh, E. G., Rand, A. S. & Windsor, D. M. (eds.). The ecology of a tropical forest. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
HEANEY, L. R. & THORINGTON, R. W. 1978. Ecology of neotropical squirrels, Sciurus granatensis, in the Panama Canal Zone. Journal of Mammalogy 59:846–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOCH, G. A. & ADLER, G. H. 1997. Removal of black palm (Astrocaryum standleyanum) by spiny rats (Proechimys semispinosus). Journal of Tropical Ecology 13:51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HULME, P. E. 1994. Post-dispersal seed predation in grassland: its magnitude and sources of variation. Journal of Ecology 82:645–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JANSEN, P. A., HIRSCH, B. T., EMSENS, W., ZAMORA-GUTIERREZ, V., WIKELSKI, M. & KAYS, R. 2012. Thieving rodents as substitute dispersers of megafaunal seeds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109:12610–12615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KARR, J. R. 1990. The avifauna of Barro Colorado and the Pipeline Road. Pp. 183–198 in Gentry, A. H. (ed.). Four neotropical rainforests. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
KILTIE, R. A. 1981. Distribution of palm fruits on a rain forest floor: why white-lipped peccaries forage near objects. Biotropica 13:141–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KILGORE, A., LAMBERT, T. D. & ADLER, G. H. 2010. Lianas influence fruit and seed use by rodents in a tropical forest. Tropical Ecology 51:265–271.Google Scholar
LAMBERT, T. D. & ADLER, G. H. 2000. Microhabitat use by a tropical forest rodent, Proechimys semispinosus, in central Panama. Journal of Mammalogy 81:70–76.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LAMBERT, T. D., MALCOLM, J. R. & ZIMMERMAN, B. L. 2005. Variation in small mammal species richness by trap height and trap type in southeastern Amazonia. Journal of Mammalogy 86:982–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LAMBERT, T. D., SUMPTER, K. L., DITTEL, J. W., DUPRE, S., CASANOVA, K., WINKER, A. & ADLER, G. H. 2014. Roads as barriers to seed dispersal by small mammals in a neotropical forest. Tropical Ecology 55:263–269.Google Scholar
LONGLAND, W. S. & PRICE, M. V. 1991. Direct observations of owls and heteromyid rodents: can predation risk explain microhabitat use? Ecology 72:2261–2273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PIERCE, B. M., LONGLAND, W. S. & JENKINS, S. H. 1992. Rattlesnake predation on desert rodents: microhabitat and species-specific effects on risk. Journal of Mammalogy 73:859–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SILVIUS, K. M. 2005. Frugivore-mediated interactions among bruchid beetles and palm fruits at Barro Colorado Island, Panama: implications for seed fate. Pp. 45–54 in Forget, P.-M. (ed). Seed fate: predation, dispersal, and seedling establishment. CABI Publishing, Wallingford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TERBORGH, J. 1990. Seed and fruit dispersal – commentary. Pp. 181–190 in Bawa, K. S. & Hadley, M. (eds.). Reproductive ecology of tropical forest plants. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, Paris.Google Scholar
TERBORGH, J. 1992. Maintenance of diversity in tropical forests. Biotropica 24:283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TERBORGH, J., LOSOS, E., RILEY, M. P. & BALANOS RILEY, M. 1993. Predation by vertebrates and invertebrates on the seeds of five canopy tree species of an Amazonian forest. Vegetatio 107/108:375–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TOMBLIN, D. C. & ADLER, G. H. 1998. Differences in habitat use between two morphologically similar tropical forest rodents. Journal of Mammalogy 79:953–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VANDER WALL, S. B., KUHN, K. M. & BECK, M. J. 2005. Seed survival, seed predation, and secondary dispersal. Ecology 86:801–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VANDERMEER, J. H. 1979. Hoarding behavior of captive Heteromys demarestianus (Rodentia) on the fruits of Welfia georgii. Tropical Ecology 20:17–26.Google Scholar
WEIBLEN, G. D. & THOMSON, J. D. 1995. Seed dispersal in Erythronium grandiflorum (Liliaceae). Oecologia 102:211–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WINDSOR, D. M. 1990. Climate and moisture variability in a tropical forest: long-term records from Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences 29:1–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WRIGHT, S. J., GOMPER, M. E. & DELEON, B. 1994. Are large predators keystone species in neotropical forests? The evidence from Barro Colorado Island. Oikos 71:279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WRIGHT, S. J., CARRASCO, C., CALDERON, O. & PATTON, S. 1999. The El Nino southern oscillation, variable fruit production, and famine in a tropical forest. Ecology 80:1632–1647.Google Scholar