Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:11:45.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reduced damage and epiphyll cover of leaves of Korthalsia rattans that host Camponotus ants in the rain forest of Malaysian Borneo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2016

Krzysztof Miler ,
Bakhtiar Effendi Yahya  and
Marcin Czarnoleski
Krzysztof Miler
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30–387 Kraków, Poland
Bakhtiar Effendi Yahya
Affiliation:
Institute for Tropical Biology and Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
Marcin Czarnoleski*
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30–387 Kraków, Poland
*
1Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Many species of palm produce chambers called domatia that are used by ants as nesting spaces. However, the ecological nature of this association is not well understood, and the information on palm–ant interactions is primarily anecdotal. Here, we conducted a field study in the secondary forest of the Danum Valley Conservation Area, Malaysian Borneo, on 41 individuals of the rattan Korthalsia furtadoana. All studied plants showed signs of a past or present partnership with domatia-nesting ants, as indicated by entry holes in domatia. In 14 plants, our physical disturbance of a stem provoked the appearance of patrolling ants of Camponotus sp. We compared the leaf conditions of rattans with and without patrolling ants, testing whether the presence of ants is linked to improved leaf health. The leaflets of plants with patrolling ants were significantly less physically damaged and less covered by epiphylls. On average, 19% of the leaflets of plants with patrolling ants were damaged (52% in plants without patrolling ants), and the epiphyll cover of their leaflets was 0.2 on our scale of 0–4 (1.3 in plants without patrolling ants). Our results suggest that this poorly studied plant–ant association has a mutualistic character. It seems that the ants take advantage of the nesting space created by the plant partner, while the plants gain protection for their photosynthetic apparatus against herbivores and epiphylls.

Keywords

antsBorneoCamponotusdomatiaepiphyllherbivoryKorthalsia furtadoanamutualismpalmssymbiosis
Type
Short Communication
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , July 2016 , pp. 330 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

BEATTIE, A. J. 2010. The evolutionary ecology of ant–plant mutualisms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 194 pp.Google Scholar
BLATRIX, R., RENARD, D., DJIETO-LORDON, C. & MCKEY, D. 2012. The cost of myrmecophytism: insights from allometry of stem secondary growth. Annals of Botany 110:943–951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BOLTON, B. 1994. Identification guide to the ant genera of the world. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 222 pp.Google Scholar
BOLTON, B. 2003. Synopsis and classification of Formicidae. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute. The American Entomological Institute, Gainesville, FL. 370 pp.Google Scholar
BROUAT, C. & MCKEY, D. 2000. Origin of caulinary ant domatia and timing of their onset in plant ontogeny: evolution of a key trait in horizontally transmitted ant-plant symbiosis. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 71:801–819.Google Scholar
COLEY, P. D., KURSAR, T. A. & MACHADO, J.-L. 1993. Colonization of tropical rain forest leaves by epiphylls: effects of site and host plant leaf lifetime. Ecology 74:619–623.Google Scholar
CHAMBERLAIN, S. A. & HOLLAND, J. N. 2009. Quantitative synthesis of context dependency in ant-plant protection mutualisms. Ecology 90:2384–2392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CHUNG, A. Y. C. 1995. Common lowland rainforest ants of Sabah. Forest Department, Sandakan. 60 pp.Google Scholar
DAVIDSON, D. W., LONGINO, J. T. & SNELLING, R. R. 1988. Pruning of host plant neighbors by ants: an experimental approach. Ecology 69:801–808.Google Scholar
DRANSFIELD, J. 1984. The rattans of Sabah. Sabah Forest Records no. 13. Forest Department, Sandakan. 182 pp.Google Scholar
DRANSFIELD, J. 2003. Beccari's “Palme Ospitatrici” revisited: ants, “scale insects” and rattan palms. Pp. 15–20 in Trucchi, G. P., Littardi, C. & Campodonieo, P. (eds.). Dies Palmarum. Centro Studi e Ricerche per le Palme, Sanremo.Google Scholar
DUTRA, H. P., FREITAS, A. V. L. & OLIVEIRA, P. S. 2006. Dual ant attraction in the neotropical shrub Urera baccifera (Urticaceae): the role of ant visitation to pearl bodies and fruits in herbivore deterrence and leaf longevity. Functional Ecology 20:252–260.Google Scholar
EDWARDS, D. P., ANSELL, F. A., WOODCOCK, P., FAYLE, T. M., CHEY, V. K. & HAMER, K. C. 2010. Can the failure to punish promote cheating in mutualism? Oikos 119:45–52.Google Scholar
FIALA, B., MASCHWITZ, U., THO, Y. P. & HELBIG, A. J. 1989. Studies of a South East Asian ant-plant association: protection of Macaranga trees by Crematogaster borneensis. Oecologia 79:463–470.Google Scholar
FREDERICKSON, M. E. 2009. Conflict over reproduction in an ant-plant symbiosis: why Allomerus octoarticulatus ants sterilize Cordia nodosa trees. American Naturalist 173:675–681.Google Scholar
ISNARD, S. & ROWE, N. P. 2007. Mechanical role of the leaf sheath in rattans. New Phytologist 177:643–652.Google Scholar
MATTES, M., MOOG, J., WERNER, M., FIALA, B., NAIS, J. & MASCHWITZ, U. 1998. The rattan palm Korthalsia robusta Bl. and its ant and aphid partners: studies of a myrmecophytic association in the Kinabalu Park. Sabah Parks Nature Journal 1:47–60.Google Scholar
MOOG, J., FIALA, B., WERNER, M., WEISSFLOG, A., GUAN, S. L. & MASCHWITZ, U. 2003. Ant-plant diversity in Peninsular Malaysia, with special reference to the Pasoh Forest Reserve. Pp. 459–494 in Okuda, T., Manokaran, N., Matsumoto, Y., Niiyama, K., Thomas, S. C. & Ashton, P. S. (eds.). Pasoh. Ecology of a lowland rain forest in Southeast Asia. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'CONNELL, D. M., MONKS, A., LEE, W. G., DOWNS, T. M. & DICKINSON, K. J. M. 2010. Leaf domatia: carbon-limited indirect defence? Oikos 119:1591–1600.Google Scholar
RICKSON, F. R. & RICKSON, M. M. 1986. Nutrient acquisition facilitated by litter collection and ant colonies on two Malaysian palms. Biotropica 18:337–343.Google Scholar
RICO-GRAY, V. & OLIVEIRA, P. S. 2007. The ecology and evolution of ant-plant interactions. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 331 pp.Google Scholar
SUAREZ, A. V., DE MORAES, C. & IPPOLITO, A. 1998. Defense of Acacia collinsii by an obligate and nonobligate ant species: the significance of encroaching vegetation. Biotropica 30:480–482.Google Scholar