Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:00:14.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Population dynamics of the black-cheeked gnateater (Conopophaga melanops, Conopophagidae) in southern Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2009

André Magnani Xavier de Lima  and
James Joseph Roper
André Magnani Xavier de Lima
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Paraná, Graduate Program in Ecology and Conservation, CP 19031, Curitiba, Paraná, 81531-980Brazil. Email: [email protected] Instituto de Pesquisa e Conservação da Natureza – Idéia Ambiental, Rua Euclides Bandeira, 1635, Curitiba, CEP 80530-020, Brazil
James Joseph Roper*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Pesquisa e Conservação da Natureza – Idéia Ambiental, Rua Euclides Bandeira, 1635, Curitiba, CEP 80530-020, Brazil
*
1Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Population structure and dynamics of the black-cheeked gnateater (Conopophaga melanops) were studied at Salto Morato Nature Reserve, in Paraná, southern Brazil, from October 2006 to September 2007. Territory size and population density, breeding season (timing and length), reproductive success and annual survival rates were estimated from sightings of 18 marked adult birds and the success of 18 nesting attempts. The black-cheeked gnateater is socially monogamous and territorial, with a breeding-season length of approximately 3 mo beginning in early October. Predation caused most nest failures, nest survival was 0.96 d−1 and apparent annual nesting success was 22%, resulting in annual productivity of 0.36 individuals per adult. Apparent adult annual survival was ~0.44 y−1. Seventy-five per cent of fledglings survived at least 2 mo after fledging. Two methods of estimating population growth rate suggest very different rates: r = −0.04 (~ stable), or λ varies between 0.475–0.616 (declining). Yet, low apparent adult survival suggests that territories are not permanent, perhaps abandoned after nest failure. We find that by estimating population growth, even in short-term studies, testable hypotheses can be generated that will allow better understanding of population dynamics.

Keywords

Atlantic ForestConopophagagnateatergrowth rateproductivitypopulation dynamicssurvival
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 25 , Issue 6 , November 2009 , pp. 605 - 613
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

AGUILAR, T. M., LEITE, L. O. & MARINI, M. Â. 1999. Biologia da nidificação de Lathrotriccus euleri (Cabanis 1968) (Tyrannidae) em fragmentos de mata de Minas Gerais. Ararajuba 7:125–133.Google Scholar
ALEIXO, A. 1999. Effects of selective logging on a bird community in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. The Condor 101:537–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ALVES, M. A. S. & DUARTE, M. F. 1996. Táticas de forrageamento de Conopohaga melanops (Passeriformes:Formicariidae) na área de Mata Atlântica da Ilha Grande, Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Ararajuba 4:110–112.Google Scholar
ALVES, M. A. S., ROCHA, C. F., VAN SLUYS, M. & VECCHI, M. B. 2002. Nest, eggs and effort partitioning in incubation and rearing by a pair of the Black-cheecked gnateater, Conopophaga melanops (Passeriformes, Conopophagidae), in an Atlantic Rainforest area of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Ararajuba 10:67–71.Google Scholar
AUER, S. K., BASSAR, R. D., FONTAINE, J. J. & MARTIN, T. E. 2007. Breeding biology of passerines in a subtropical montane forest in northwestern Argentina. The Condor 109:321–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BRAWN, J. D., KARR, J. R. & NICHOLS, J. D. 1995. Demography of birds in a neotropical forest: effects of allometry, taxonomy, and ecology. Ecology 76:41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BROOKS, T. & BALMFORD, A. 1996. Atlantic forest extinctions. Nature 380:115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHASE, M. K., NUR, N. & GEUPEL, G. R. 1997. Survival, productivity and abundance in a Wilson's Warbler population. The Auk 114:354–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHRISTIANSEN, M. B. & PITTER, E. 1997. Species loss in a forest bird community near Lagoa Santa in Southeastern Brazil. Biological Conservation 80:23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COSTA, L. M. & RODRIGUES, M. 2007. Novo registro do beija-flor-de-gravata-verde Augastes scutatus estende o período reprodutivo da espécie. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 15:131–134.Google Scholar
DINSMORE, S. J. & DINSMORE, J. J. 2007. Modeling avian nest survival in program mark. Studies in Avian Biology 34:73–83.Google Scholar
DUCA, C. & MARINI, M. Â. 2004. Aspectos da nidificação de Cacicus haemorrhous (Passeriformes, Icterinae) no sudeste do Brasil. Ararajuba 12:23–30.Google Scholar
DUCA, C. & MARINI, M. Â. 2005a. Temporal variation of reproductive success of Cacicus haemorrhous (Linnaeus) (Aves:Icterinae) in an Atlantic Forest reserve in Southeast Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 22:484–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DUCA, C. & MARINI, M. Â. 2005b. Territory size of the flavescent warbler, Basileuterus flaveolus (Passeriformes, Emberizidae), in a forest fragment in Southeastern Brazil. Lundiana 6:29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DUCA, C., GUERRA, T. J. & MARINI, M. Â. 2006. Territory size of three Antbirds (Aves, Passeriformes) in an Atlantic Forest fragment in southeastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 23:692–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FBPN (Fundação O Boticário de Proteção a Natureza). 2001. Plano de Manejo da Reserva Natural Salto Morato. Curitiba, PR.Google Scholar
GARDALI, T., BARTON, D. C., WHITE, J. D. & GEUPEL, G. R. 2003. Juvenile and adult survival of Swainson's Thrush (Catharus ustulatus) in coastal California: annual estimates using capture–recapture analyses. The Auk 120:1188–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HAU, M., WIKELSKI, M. & WINGFIELD, J. C. 1998. A neotropical forest bird can measure the slight changes in tropical photoperiod. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 265:89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HILLMAN, S. W. & HOGAN, D. R. 2002. First nest record of the Ash-throated Gnateater (Conopophaga peruviana). Ornitologia Neotropical 13:293–295.Google Scholar
HILTY, S. L. 1975. Notes on a nest and behaviour of the Chestnut-crowned Gnateater. The Condor 77:513–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KARR, J. R., NICHOLS, J. D., KLIMKIEWICZ, M. K. & BRAWN, J. D. 1990. Survival rates of birds of tropical and temperate forests: will the dogma survive. American Naturalist 136:277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LIMA, A. M. X. & ROPER, J. J. 2009. The use of playbacks can influence encounters with birds: an experiment. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia, in press.Google Scholar
LOPES, L. E. & MARINI, M. Â. 2006. Home range and habitat use by Suiriri affinis and S. islerorum in Central Brazilian Cerrado. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 41:87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LUNARDI, V. O., FRANCISCO, M. R. & GALLETI, P. M. 2008. Population structuring of the endemic Black-cheeked gnateater, Conopophaga melanops melanops (Vieillot 1818) (Aves, Conopophagidae), in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Brazilian Journal of Biology 67:867–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LYON, B. E., CHAINE, A. S. & WINKLER, D. W. 2008. Ecology: a matter of timing. Science 321:1051–1052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MAACK, R. 2002. Geografia física do Estado do Paraná. Imprensa Oficial, Curitiba. 438 pp.Google Scholar
MACHADO, R. B & DA FONSECA, G. A. B. 2000. The avifauna of Rio Doce Valley, southeastern Brazil, a highly fragmented area. Biotropica 32:914–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAIA-GOUVÊA, E. R., GOUVÊA, E. & PIRATELLI, A. 2005. Comunidade de aves de sub-bosque em uma área de entorno do Parque Nacional do Itatiaia, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 22:859–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MARINI, M. Â. & GARCIA, F. I. 2005. Conservação de aves no Brasil. Megadiversidade 1:95–102.Google Scholar
MARQUES, M. C. M., ROPER, J. J. & SALVALAGGIO, A. P. B. 2004. Phenological patterns among plant life-forms in a subtropical forest in southern Brazil. Plant Ecology 173:203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MARTIN, T. E. 1995. Avian life history evolution in relation to nest sites, nest predation, and food. Ecological Monographs 65:101–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MEDEIROS, R. C. S. & MARINI, M. Â. 2007. Biologia reprodutiva de Elaenia chiriquensis (Lawrence) (Aves, Tyrannidae) em Cerrado do Brasil Central. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 24:12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MORELLATO, L. P. C. & HADDAD, C. F. B. 2000. Introduction: the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biotropica 32:786–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MORTON, E. S. & STUTCHBURY, B. J. M. 2000. Demography and reproductive success in the Dusky Antbird, a sedentary tropical passerine. Journal of Field Ornithology 71:493–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ODUM, E. P. 2004. Fundamentos de ecologia. Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisboa. 927 pp.Google Scholar
PICHORIM, M. 2002. Biologia reprodutiva do bacurau-tesoura-gigante (Macropsalis forcipata, Caprimulgidae) no morro Anhangava, Paraná, Sul do Brasil. Ararajuba 10:149–165.Google Scholar
RANGEL-SALAZAR, J. L., MARTIN, K., MARSHALL, P. & ELNER, R.W. 2008. Population dynamics of the ruddy-capped nightingale thrush (Catharus frantzii) in Chiapas, Mexico: influences of density, productivity and survival. Journal of Tropical Ecology. 24:583–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RICE, N. H. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships of Antpitta genera (Passeriformes: Formaricariidae). The Auk 122:673–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RICKLEFS, R. E. 1969. An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 9:1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RICKLEFS, R. E. 2000. Lack, Skutch and Moreau: the early development of life-history thinking. The Condor 1:3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RICKLEFS, R. E. & BLOOM, G. 1977. Components of avian breeding productivity. The Auk 94:86–96.Google Scholar
RIDGELY, R. S. & TUDOR, G. 1994. The birds of South America: the suboscine passerines. University of Texas Press, Austin. 814 pp.Google Scholar
ROBINSON, W. D., ROBINSON, T. R., ROBINSON, S. K. & BRAWN, J. D. 2000a. Nesting success of understory forest birds in central Panama. Journal of Avian Biology 31:151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROBINSON, W. D., BRAWN, J. D. & ROBINSON, S. K. 2000b. Forest bird community structure in Central Panama: influence of spatial scale and biogeography. Ecological Monographs 70:209–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROPER, J. J. 2005. Try and try again: nest predation favors persistence in a neotropical bird. Ornitolologia Neotropical 16:253–262.Google Scholar
ROPER, J. J. 2006. What does “Wildlife Management” mean for Brazil? Natureza e Conservação Brazil 4:107–116.Google Scholar
RUSSELL, E. M. 2000. Avian life histories: is extend parental care the southern secret? Emu 100:377–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SÆTHER, B. E. & BAKKE, Ø. 2000. Avian life history variation and contribution of demographic traits to the population growth rate. Ecology 81:642–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SÆTHER, B. E., ENGEN, S., MOLLER, A. P., WEIMERSKIRCH, W., VISSER, M. E., FIEDLER, W., MATTHYSEN, E., LAMBRECHTS, M. M., BADYAEV, A., BECKER, P. H., BROMMER, J. E., BUKACINSKI, D., BUKACINSKA, M., CHRISTENSEN, J., DICKINSON, J., DU FEU, C., GEHLBACH, F. R., HEG, D., HOTKER, H., NIELSEN, J. T., MERILÄ, J., RENDELL, W., ROBERTSON, R. J., THOMSON, D., TÖRÖK, J. & VAN HECKE, P. 2004. Life-history variations predict the effects of demographic stochasticity on avian population dynamics. American Naturalist 164:793–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SÁNCHEZ, G. & APONTE, M. A. 2006. Primera descripción del nido y huevos de Conopophaga ardesiaca. Kempffiana 2:102–105.Google Scholar
SIBLY, R. M., BARKER, D., DENHAM, M. C., HONE, J. & PAGEL, M. 2005. On the regulation of populations of mammals, birds, fish and insects. Science 309:607–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SICK, H. 1997. Ornitologia Brasileira. Nova Fronteira, Rio de Janeiro. 912 pp.Google Scholar
SKUTCH, A. F. 1985. Clutch size, nesting success, and predation on nests of neotropical birds, reviewed. Ornithological Monographs 36:575–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STAHL, J. T. & OLI, M. K. 2006. Relative importance of avian life-history variables to population growth rate. Ecological Modelling 198:23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STOUFFER, P. C. 2007. Density, territory size, and long-term spatial dynamics of a guild of terrestrial insectivorous birds near Manaus, Brazil. The Auk 124:292–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STUTCHBURY, B. J. M. & MORTON, E. S. 2001. Behavioral ecology of tropical birds. Academic Press, London. 180 pp.Google Scholar
TERBORGH, J., ROBINSON, S. K., PARKER, T. A., MUNN, C. A. & PIERPONT, N. 1990. Structure and organization of an Amazonian forest bird community. Ecological Monographs 60:213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WIKELSKI, M., HAU, M. & WINGFIELD, J. C. 2000. Seasonality of reproduction in a neotropical rain forest bird. Ecology 81:2458–2472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WILLIS, E. O., ONIKI, Y. & SILVA, W. R. 1983. On the behaviour of Rufous Gnateaters (Conopophaga lineata, Formicariidae). Naturalia 8:67–83.Google Scholar
WOLDA, H. 1992. Trends in abundance of tropical insects. Oecologia 89: 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WOODWORTH, B. L., FAABORG, J. & ARENDT, W. J. 1999. Survival and longevity of the Puerto Rico Vireo. Wilson Bulletin 111:376–380.Google Scholar
WORTON, B. J. 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70:164–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar