Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:54:41.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Overcoming the regeneration barriers of tropical dry forest: effects of water stress and herbivory on seedling performance and allocation of key tree species for restoration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2022

Carlos Daniel Cárdenas Open the ORCID record for Carlos Daniel Cárdenas [Opens in a new window] ,
Daniela Varón-García Open the ORCID record for Daniela Varón-García [Opens in a new window] ,
Freddy Suárez-Rodríguez Open the ORCID record for Freddy Suárez-Rodríguez [Opens in a new window]  and
Camila Pizano Open the ORCID record for Camila Pizano [Opens in a new window]
Carlos Daniel Cárdenas*
Affiliation:
Universidad Icesi, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas. Calle 18 # 122-135, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
Daniela Varón-García
Affiliation:
Universidad Icesi, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas. Calle 18 # 122-135, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia Department of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL33620, USA
Freddy Suárez-Rodríguez
Affiliation:
Universidad Icesi, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas. Calle 18 # 122-135, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia Åbo Akademi University, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Biosciences, Turku, Finland Turku Centre for Biotechnology, Åbo Akademi University and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
Camila Pizano
Affiliation:
Universidad Icesi, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas. Calle 18 # 122-135, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
*
Author for correspondence: Carlos Daniel Cárdenas, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tropical dry forests (TDF) are one of the most threatened and poorly protected ecosystems in the Americas. Although there are international efforts for the restoration of TDF, how stress factors such as herbivory or water limitation due to changes in precipitation, impact the regeneration dynamics of these forests is poorly understood. Specifically, how seedlings of key tree species for TDF restoration cope with current abiotic pressures such as the intensification of climatic events, and biotic factors like herbivory, is not yet fully understood. Here, we compared seedling performance, and allocation of biomass, and water to roots vs. shoots for three legume, and one non-legume TDF tree species, as a response to water limitation and herbivory in an 8-month greenhouse experiment. Contrary to our expectations, we found that the non-legume species, G. ulmifolia, had the best performance compared to legumes, while N-fixing and non-fixing legumes showed similar performance. Based on our findings, we suggest the use of G. ulmifolia in TDF restoration projects due to its high performance despite abiotic and biotic stress factors, its allocation of biomass and water to belowground structures. We also recommend the use of N-fixing legume species owing to their ability to fix nitrogen, which guarantees an N input to the soil, important in the first stages of succession. However, the legume species used in this experiment do not appear to resist the abiotic and biotic stressors studied. Thus, more studies exploring the response of dry forest plant species to stress factors are key for informing and assuring more effective TDF restoration efforts.

Keywords

Biomass allocationherbivoryrestorationseedlingstropical dry forestwater stress
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , July 2022 , pp. 210 - 218
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, K, Dupuy, M, Gei, M, Hulshof, C, Medvigy, D, Pizano, C, Salgado-Negret, B, Smith, C, Trierweiler, A, Van Bloem, S, Waring, B, Xu, X and Powers, J (2017) Will seasonally dry tropical forests be sensitive or resistant to future changes in rainfall regimes? Environmental Research Letters 12, 023001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, ER and Martinez, M (1990) Seed bank versus seed rain in the regeneration of a tropical pioneer tree. Oecologia 84, 314–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, RR, Burrell, MM, Rose, KE, Osborne, CP & Rees, M (2014) The dynamics of recovery and growth: how defoliation affects stored resources. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281, 20133355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batterman, SA, Hedin, LO, Van Breugel, M, Ransijn, J, Craven, DJ and Hall, JS (2013) Key role of symbiotic dinitrogen fixation in tropical forest secondary succession. Nature 502, 224–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, WR & Jordan, RC (2014) Restoring tropical dry forest communities: effects of habitat management and outplantings on composition and structure. Restoration Ecology 22,160–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burney, DA and Burney, LP (2016) Monitoring results from a decade of native plant translocations at Makauwahi Cave Reserve, Kauái. Plant Ecology 217, 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, S, Sánchez, AG, Duran, SM and Espírito-Santo, MM (2016) Assessing ecosystem services in Neotropical dry forests: a systematic review. Environmental Conservation 44, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castrejón, FA, Martínez, P, Corona, L, Cerdán, JL and Mendoza, GD (2016) Partial substitution of soybean meal by Gliricidia sepium or Guazuma ulmifolia leaves in the rations of growing lambs. Tropical Animal Health and Production 48, 133–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunze, S, Heydel, F & Tackenberg, O (2013) Are plant species able to keep pace with the rapidly changing climate? PLoS ONE 8, e67909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimson, M & Gillespie, TW (2020) Trends in active restoration of tropical dry forest: methods, metrics, and outcomes. Forest Ecology and Management 467, 118150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirzo, R, Young, HS, Mooney, HA and Ceballos, G (2011) Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests, Ecology and Conservation. Washington, DC: Island Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, AP, Bradshaw, A and Baker, A (1997) Hopes for the future: restoration ecology and conservation biology. Science 277, 515–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DRYFLOR (2016) Plant diversity patterns in neotropical dry forests and their conservation implications. Science 353, 1383–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fajardo, L, Rodríguez, J, González, V and Briceño-Linares, J (2013) Restoration of a degraded tropical dry forest in Macanao, Venezuela. Journal of Arid Environments 88, 236–243. Elsevier Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farooq, M, Wahid, A, Kobayashi, N, Fujita, D and Basra, S (2009) Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 29, 185–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florentine, S K and Westbrooke, M E (2004). Restoration on abandoned tropical pasturelands-Do we know enough? Journal for Nature Conservation 12, 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fundación Natura Colombia (2014) Pilot plan for the ecological restoration of the dry forest. https://natura.org.co/subdireccion-de-conservacion-e-investigacion/plan-piloto-de-restauracion-ecologica-de-bosque-seco/ Google Scholar
Gerhardt, K (1998) Leaf defoliation of tropical dry forest tree seedlings - Implications for survival and growth. Trees – Structure and Function 13:88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, R, Posada, JM, Carmona, CP, Garzón, F, Salinas, V, Idárraga, A, Pizano, C, Avella, A, López, R, Norden, N, Nieto, J, Medina, SP, Rodríguez, MGM, Franke-Ante, R, Torres, AM, Jurado, R, Cuadros, H, Castaño, A, García, H and Salgado-Negret, B (2020) Diverging functional strategies but high sensitivity to an extreme drought in tropical dry forests. Ecology Letters. 24, 451–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Tokman, D, Barradas, V, Boege, K, Domínguez, C, Del-Val, E, Saucedo, E and Martínez-Garza, C (2018). Performance of 11 tree species under different management treatments in restoration plantings in a tropical dry forest. Restoration Ecology 26, 642–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, WA, Orthen, B and Franco, AC (2004) Constraints to seedling success of savanna and forest trees across the savanna-forest boundary. Oecologia 140, 252–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huante, P and Rincón, E (1998) Responses to light changes in tropical deciduous woody seedlings with contrasting growth rates. Oecologia 113, 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, DL (2014) Johnson Curve Toolbox for Matlab: Analysis of Non-Normal Data using the Johnson Family of Distributions. College of Marine Science. St. Petersburg, FL: University of South Florida.Google Scholar
Khurana, E and Singh, J (2001) Ecology of seed and seedling growth for conservation and restoration of tropical dry forest: a review. Environmental Conservation 28, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khurana, E and Singh, J (2004) Germination and seedling growth of five tree species from tropical dry forest in relation to water stress: impact of seed size. Journal of Tropical Ecology 20, 385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanuza, O, Espelta, J, Peñuelas, J and Peguero, G (2020). Assessing intraspecific trait variability during seedling establishment to improve restoration of tropical dry forests. Ecosphere 11, e03052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manríquez, LY, López, S, Pérez, P, Ortega, E, López, Z.G and Villarruel, M (2011) Agronomic and forage characteristics of Guazuma ulmifolia Lam. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 14, 453–463.Google Scholar
Marquis, RJ (1984) Leaf herbivores decrease fitness of a tropical plant. Science 226, 537–539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Brien, MJ, Leuzinger, S, Philipson, CD, Tay, J and Hector, A (2014) Drought survival of tropical tree seedlings enhanced by non-structural carbohydrate levels. Nature Climate Change 4, 710–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkhurst, DF and Loucks, OL (1972) Optimal Leaf Size in Relation to Environment. The Journal of Ecology 60, 505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, TR, Burslem, DF, Goeriz, RE & Dalling, JW (2003) Regeneration niche partitioning in neotropical pioneers: effects of gap size, seasonal drought and herbivory on growth and survival. Oecologia 137, 456–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennington, RT, Lehmann, CE and Rowland, LM (2018) Tropical savannas and dry forests. Current Biology 28, R527–R548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pineda-García, F, Paz, H and Meinzer, FC (2013) Drought resistance in early and late secondary successional species from a tropical dry forest: the interplay between xylem resistance to embolism, sapwood water storage and leaf shedding. Plant, Cell and Environment 36, 405–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poorter, L, Kitajima, K, Mercado, P, Chubiña, J, Melgar, I and Prins, HHT (2010) Resprouting as a persistence strategy of tropical forest trees: relations with carbohydrate storage and shade tolerance. Ecology 91, 2613–2627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poorter, L and Markesteijn, L (2008) Seedling traits determine drought tolerance of tropical tree species. Biotropica 40, 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portillo, C and Sánchez, GA (2010) Extent and conservation of tropical dry forests in the Americas. Biological Conservation 143, 144–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portillo-Quintero, C, Sánchez-Azofeifa, GA, Calvo-Alvarado, J, Quesada, M and Espirito Santo, M M (2015) The role of tropical dry forests for biodiversity, carbon and water conservation in the neotropics: lesson learned and opportunities for its sustainable management. Reg Environ Change 15, 1039–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quentin, AG, O’Grady, AP, Beadle, CL, Mohammed, C & Pinkard, EA (2012) Interactive effects of water supply and defoliation on photosynthesis, plant water status and growth of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. Tree Physiology 32, 958–967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quesada, M, Sánchez-Azofeifa, GA, Alvarez-Añorve, M, Stoner, KE, Alvila-Cabadilla, L, Calvo-Alvarado, J, Castillo, A, Espirito Santo, M M, Fagundes, M, Fernandes, GW, Gaom, J, Lopezaraiza-Mikel, M, Lawrence, D, Cerdeira-Morellato, LP, Powers, JS, de S Neves, F, Rosas-Guerrero, V, Sayago, R and Sanchez-Montoya, G (2009) Succession and management of tropical dry forests in the Americas: review and new perspectives. Forest Ecology and Management 258, 1014–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quisehuatl-Medina, A, Averett, JP, Endress, BA and Lopez, L (2020). Removal of cattle accelerates tropical dry forest succession in Northwestern Mexico. Biotropica 52, 457–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, PB and Borchert, R (1984) Water stress and tree phenology in a tropical dry forest in the Lowlands of Costa Rica. The Journal of Ecology 72, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez, GA, Quesada, A, Rodriguez, JP, Nassar, JM, Stoner, KE, Castillo, A, Garvin, T, Zent, EL, Calvo, JC, Kalacska, M, Fajardo, L, Gamon, JA and Cuevas, P (2005) Research priorities for neotropical dry forests. Biotropica 37, 477–485.Google Scholar
Slot, M and Poorter, L (2007) Diversity of tropical tree seedling responses to drought. Biotropica 39, 683–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoner, K and Sánchez, GA (2009) Ecology and regeneration of tropical dry forests in the Americas: implications for management. Forest Ecology and Management. 258, 903–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, SY and Agrawal, AA (1999) The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14, 179–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, BN, Chazdon, RL, Bachelot, B and Menge, DNL (2017) Nitrogen-fixing trees inhibit growth of regenerating Costa Rican rainforests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114, 8817–8822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torres, S, Díaz, JE, Villota, A, Gómez, W and Avella, A (2019) Diagnóstico ecológico, formulación e implementación de estrategias para la restauración de un bosque seco tropical interandino (Huila, Colombia). Caldasia 41, 42–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trejo, I and Dirzo, R (2000) Deforestation of seasonally dry tropical forest: a national and local analysis in Mexico. Biological Conservation 94, 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargas, W and Ramírez, W (2014) Lineamientos generales para la restauración del bosque seco tropical en Colombia. In Pizano, C and García, H (eds.), El bosque seco tropical en Colombia. Bogotá, DC: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. pp. 253–286.Google Scholar
Veenendaal, E, Swaine, M, Agyeman, V, Blay, D, Abebrese, I and Mullins, C (1995) Differences in plant and soil water relations in and around a forest gap in West Africa during the dry season may influence seedling establishment and survival. Journal of Ecology 83, 83–90.Google Scholar
Velazco, SJ, Villalobos, F, Galvão, F and De Marco Júnior, P (2019) A dark scenario for Cerrado plant species: effects of future climate, land use and protected areas ineffectiveness. Diversity and Distributions 25, 660–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdaguer, D & Ojeda, F (2002) Root starch storage and allocation patterns in seeder and resprouter seedlings of two Cape Erica (Ericaceae) species. American Journal of Botany 89, 1189–1196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vitousek, PM, Cassman, K, Cleveland, C, Crews, T, Field, C, Grimm, N, Howarth, R, Marino, R, Martinelli, L, Rastetter, E and Sprent, J (2002) Towards an ecological understanding of biological nitrogen fixation. Biogeochemistry 57, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werden, LK, Alvarado, JP, Zarges, S, Calderón, E, Schilling, EM, Gutiérrez, M & Powers, J (2018) Using soil amendments and plant functional traits to select native tropical dry forest species for the restoration of degraded Vertisols. Journal of Applied Ecology 55, 1019–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G and Alvarez, C (2010) Tropical dry forest landscape restoration in Central Veracruz, Mexico. Ecological Restoration 28, 259–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeppel, MJB, Harrison, SP, Adams, HD, Kelley, DI, Li, G, Tissue, DT, Dawson, TE, Fensham, R, Medlyn, BE, Palmer, A, West, AG and McDowell, NG (2015) Drought and resprouting plants. New Phytologist 206, 583–589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Cárdenas et al. supplementary material

Cárdenas et al. supplementary material

Download Cárdenas et al. supplementary material(File)
File 96.2 KB