Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:05:39.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Orchid—phorophyte relationships in a forest watershed in Puerto Rico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Luis E. Migenis  and
James D. Ackerman
Luis E. Migenis
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, PO Box 23360, San Juan, PR 00931–3360, USA and Institute of Tropical Forestry, Southern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, Call Box 25000, Rio Piedras, PR 00928–2500, USA
James D. Ackerman
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, PO Box 23360, San Juan, PR 00931–3360, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Orchid diversity, distribution and host specificity were examined in a tropical watershed in the Luquillo Experimental Forest of Puerto Rico. Eleven orchid species occur in the area. The low diversity is attributed to island isolation and large-scale hurricane disturbances. Pleurothallis ruscifolia and Maxillaria coccinea were by far the most abundant species in the area and occurred on the largest number of host species and host zones. None of the orchids were host specific or host zone specialists although preferences for hosts and vertical host zones were encountered.

Only 8.2% of the 426 trees and shrubs and 24.4% of the 45 species surveyed were orchid phorophytes (= hosts). Examination of host distribution by diameter at breast height (DBH) showed that 80.5% were greater than 16 cm DBH. Orchid species in the area tend to occur on rough bark hosts, but their preferences are not statistically significant. Guarea guidonia (Meliaceae) and Dacryodes excelsa (Burseraceae) are the two most important orchid hosts in our study site comprising 62.9% of all host trees. Careful management of these two tree species is suggested, since these species may be crucial to the maintenance of orchid abundance and diversity in the area.

Resumen

Se examinó la diversidad, distributión y especificidad de especies epifiticas de orquídeas por árbol hospedero en una cuenca hidrográfica de Bosque Experimental de Luquillo, Puerto Rico. Se observaron once especies de orquídeas en el área de estudio. Sugerimos que la diversidad baja es una consecuencia de aislamiento de la isla y destructión periódica de la selva por huracanes. Pleurothallis ruscifolia y Maxillaria coccinea fueron las especies de orquiódea más abundantes en el área y estas ocurren en el mayor número de especies y zonas de hospedero. Ninguna orquídea es específica a algún hospedero o especialista a alguna zona de éste, aunque se notaron preferencias por árboles y zonas.

Sólo el 8.2% de los 426 árboles y arbustos y el 24.4% de las especies examinadas hospedaron orquídeas. Se observó que el 80.5% de los árboles hospederos poseen diámetros a la altura del pecho mayores de 16 cm. Las especies de orquídeas en el area tienen una tendencia a ocurrir en cortezas ásperas, pero la preferencia no es significante estadisticamente. Guarea guidonia (Meliaceae) y Dacryodes excelsa (Burseraceae) son las especies hospederas de orquideas más importantes en el área de estudio componiendo un 62.9% de todas las especies hospederas. Se sugiere el manejo cuidadoso de estos dos especies ya que estas especies podrian jugar un papel crucial en mantener la abundancia y diversidad de orquídeas.

Keywords

biodiversityconservationepiphytehost specificityhurricane damageNeotropicsPuerto Ricorain forest
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , May 1993 , pp. 231 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Ackerman, J. D. 1986. Coping with the epiphytic existence: pollination strategies. Selbyana 9:52–60.Google Scholar
Ackerman, J. D., Galarza-Perez, M. 1991. Patterns and maintenance of extraordinary variation in the Caribbean orchid, Tolumnia (Oncidium) variegata. Systematic Botany 16:182–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, J. D., Montalvo, A. M. & Vera, A. M. 1989. Epiphytic Host Specificity of Encyclia krugii, a Puerto Rican endemic orchid. Lindleyana 4:74–77.Google Scholar
Allen, P. H. 1959. Orchid hosts in the tropics. American Orchid Society Bulletin 28:243–244.Google Scholar
Barkman, J. J. 1958. Phytosociology and ecology of cryptogamic epiphytes. Van Boreum and Company, Assen. 628 pp.Google Scholar
Barnett, P. & Beattie, S. 1986. Host species of Gunn's orchid (Sarcochilus australis) from Otway National Park. Victorian Naturalist 103:168–169.Google Scholar
Bellingham, P. J. 1991. Landforms influence patterns of hurricane damage: evidence from Jamaican montane forests. Biotropica 23:427–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benzing, D. H. 1979. Alternative interpretations for the evidence that certain orchids and bromeliads act as shoot parasites. Selbyana 5:135–144.Google Scholar
Benzing, D. H. 1980. The biology of the bromeliads. Mad River Press. Eureka, California. 305 pp.Google Scholar
Catling, P. M., Brownell, V. R. & Lefkovitch, L. P. 1986. Epiphytic orchids in a Belizean grapefruit orchard: distribution, colonization, and association. Lindleyana 1:194–202.Google Scholar
Catling, P. M. & Lefkovitch, L. P. 1989. Associations of vascular epiphytes in a Guatemalan cloud forest. Biotropica 21:35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, M. W. 1987. Obligate twig epiphytism in the Oncidiinae and other neotropical orchids. Selbyana 10:24–30.Google Scholar
Clements, M. A. 1987. Orchid-fungus-host associations of epiphytic orchids. Pp. 80–63 in Saito, K. & Tanaka, R. (eds.). Proceedings of the 12th world orchid conference, Tokyo. 438 pp.Google Scholar
Dressler, R. L. 1981. The orchids: natural history and classification. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 332 pp.Google Scholar
Ewel, J. J. & Whitmore, J. R. 1973. The ecological life zones of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Research Paper ITF-18. Institute of Tropical Forestry, Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico. 72 pp., map.Google Scholar
Frei, J. K. 1973. Orchid ecology in a cloud forest in the mountains of Oaxaca, Mexico. American Orchid Society Bulletin 42:307–314.Google Scholar
Frei, J. K. & Dodson, C. H. 1972. The chemical effects of certain bark substrates on the germination and early growth of epiphytic orchids. Bulletin Torrey Botanical Club 99:301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentry, A. & Dodson, C. H. 1987a. Contribution of nontrces to species richness of a tropical rain forest. Biotropica 19:149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentry, A. & Dodson, C. H. 1987b. Diversity and biogeography of neotropical vascular epiphytes. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 74:205–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, R. A. 1988–1989. Flora of the Lesser Antilles. Dicotyledonae. Vol. 4–6. Arnold Arboretum, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts. 673, 604, and 658 pp.Google Scholar
Johansson, D. 1974. Ecology of vascular epiphytes in West African rain forests. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 59:1–129.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. L. 1985. Epiphytes and climbers of a Jamaican rain forest: vertical distribution, life forms and life histories. Journal of Biogeography 12:223–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kress, W. J. 1986. The systematic distribution of vascular epiphytes: an update. Selbyana 9:2–22.Google Scholar
Liogier, H. A. 1988. Descriptive flora of Puerto Rico and adjacent islands. Spematophyta, Vol. 2. Editorial de la Universidad de Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico. 481 pp.Google Scholar
Liogier, H. A. & Martorell, L. F. 1982. Flora of Puerto Rico and adjacent islands: a systematic synopsis. Editorial de la Universidad de Puerto Rico, Río Piedras, Puerto Rico. 342 pp.Google Scholar
Montalvo, A. M. & Ackerman, J. D. 1987. Limitations to natural fruit production in Ionopsis utricularioides (Orchidaceae). Biotropica 19:24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochsner, F. 1928. Studien über die Epiphyten-Vegetation der Schweiz. Jahrbuch der St Gallischen Naturwissenshaftlichen Gesellschaft 63:1–108.Google Scholar
Perez, J. 1982. Estudio de la distributión de epifitas sobre especies arboreas representativas en basques de palma. Thesis. University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras, Puerto Rico. 89 pp.Google Scholar
Proctor, G. R. 1989. Ferns of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden, Vol. 53. 389 pages.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Robles, J. A., Ackerman, J. D. & Melendez, E. J. 1990. Host distribution and hurricane damage to an orchid population at Tore Negro Forest, Puerto Rico. Caribbean Journal of Science 26:163–164.Google Scholar
Sanford, W. W. 1974. The ecology of orchids. Pp. 1–100 in Withner, C. (ed.). The orchids: scientific studies. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 604 pp.Google Scholar
Scatena, F. N. 1989. An introduction to the physiography and history of the Bisley Experimental Watersheds Luquillo Mountains of Puerto Rico. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service General Technical Report SO-72. Southern Forest Experimental Station, New Orleans, Louisiana. 22 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scatena, F. N. 1990. Watershed scale rainfall interception on two forested watersheds in the Luquillo Mountains of Puerto Rico. Journal of Hydrology 113:89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scatena, F. N. & Larsen, M. C. 1991. Physical aspects of Hurricane Hugo in Puerto Rico. Biotropica 23:317–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulit, M. D. 1950. Field observations on tree hosts of orchids in the Philippines. Philippine Orchid Review 3:3–8.Google Scholar
Sulit, M. D. 1953. Field observations on tree hosts of orchids in Palawan. Philippine Orchid Review 5:16.Google Scholar
Ter Steege, H. & Cornelissen, J. H. C. 1989. Distribution and ecology of vascular epiphytes in lowland rain forest of Guyana. Biotropica 21:331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, L. R., Voltzow, J., Ackerman, J. D., Fernandez, D. S. & Fetcher, N. 1992. Immediate impact of Hurricane Hugo on a Puerto Rican rain forest. Ecology 73:691–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Went, F. W. 1940. Soziologie de epiphyten eines tropischen urwaldes. Annals du Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg 50:1–98.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, J. K. & Olmsted, I. C. 1992. Host tree utilization by vascular epiphytes in a seasonallyinundated forest (Tintal) in México. Biotropica 24:402–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar