Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:50:10.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Litterfall and productivity of Eucalyptus camaldulensis in Thailand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Somchai Thoranisorn ,
Pongsak Sahunalu  and
Kyoji Yoda
Somchai Thoranisorn
Affiliation:
Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10903, Thailand
Pongsak Sahunalu
Affiliation:
Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10903, Thailand
Kyoji Yoda
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Osaka City University, Osaka 558, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

EucalyptuslitterfallproductivityThailand
Type
Short Communication
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , May 1991 , pp. 275 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Bray, J. R. & Gorham, E. 1964. Litter production in forests of the world. Advances in Ecological Research 2:101–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawahara, T., K.Anazawa, Y. & Sakurai, S. 1981. Biomass and net production of man-made forests in the Philippines. Journal of The Japanese Forestry Society 63(9):320–327.Google Scholar
Lim, M. T. 1988. Studies on Acacia mangium in Kemasul Forest, Malaysia. I. Biomass and productivity. Journal of Tropical Ecology 4:293–302.Google Scholar
Monsi, M. & Saeki, T. 1953. Uber den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung fue die Stoffproduktion. Japanese Journal of Botany 14:22–52.Google Scholar
Newbould, P. J. 1967. Methods for estimating the primary production of forest. IBP Handbook No. 2 Blackwell Scientific Publications. Oxford and Edinburgh. 62 pp.Google Scholar
Ogawa, H. 1977. Principles and methods of estimating primary production in forest. Pp. 29–35 in Shidei, T. & Kira, T. (eds). Primary production of Japanese forests. JIBP Synthesis Volume 16 University of Tokyo Press. Tokyo. 289 pp.Google Scholar
Ogawa, H., Yoda, K., Ogino, K. & K.Ira, T. 1965. Comparative ecological studies on three main types of forest vegetation in Thailand. II. Plant biomass. Nature and Life in Southeast Asia 4:49–80.Google Scholar
Ovington, J. D. 1957. Dry-matter production by Pinus sylvestris L. Annals of Botany 21:287–314.Google Scholar
Royal Forest Department. 1987. Planting eucalyptus in Thailand. Office of Private Plantation Promotion, Royal Forest Department, Bangkok. 87 pp. (In Thai).Google Scholar
Thaiutsa, B. & Taweesuk, S. 1987. Eucalyptus plantation in Thailand. Thai Journal of Forestry 6:437–443.Google Scholar
Turnbull, J. W. & Pryor, L. D. 1984. Choice of species and seed sources. Pp. 6–65 in Hills, W. E. & Brown, A. G. (eds). Eucalypts for wood production. Academic Press, Australia. 434 pp.Google Scholar