Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T09:04:39.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth rates and age-size relationships of tropical wet forest trees in Costa Rica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Diana Lieberman
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of North Dakota, Grand ForksND 58202, USA
Milton Lieberman
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of North Dakota, Grand ForksND 58202, USA
Gary Hartshorn
Affiliation:
Tropical Science Center, San José, Costa Rica
Rodolfo Peralta
Affiliation:
Tropical Science Center, San José, Costa Rica

Abstract

Diameter growth rates and age-size relationships are reported for 45 abundant tree species and one liana in tropical wet forest at La Selva, Costa Rica. Thirteen-year increments in each species were analysed using growth simulation, a stochastic technique which projects growth trajectories.

Median growth rates ranged from 0.35 mm yr-1 (Anaxagorea crassipetala) to 13.41 mm yr-1) (Stryphnodendron excelsum). Maximum ranges ranged from 0.95 mm yr-1 (Quararibea brac-teolosa) to 14.62 mm yr-1 (Hernandia didymanthera). Minimum rates ranged from zero growth (Capparis pittieri, Colubrina spinosa, Doliocarpus spp.) to 7.45 mm yr-1 (Stryphno dendron excelsum).

Projected lifespan (from 100 mm dbh to the maximum dbh for the species) varied from 52 years (Anaxagorea crassipetala, Guatteria inuncta) to 442 years (Carapa guianensis). The mean longevity among the 45 tree species studied is 190 years.

Four main patterns of growth behaviour are recognized, based upon longevity and growth rates: (1) understorey species have slow maximum growth rates and short lifespans; (2) shade-tolerant subcanopy trees live around twice as long as understorey trees and grow at approxi-mately the same maximum rates; (3) canopy and subcanopy trees that are shade-tolerant but respond opportunistically to increased light levels have long lifespans and fast maximum growth rates; (4) shade-intolerant canopy and subcanopy species are short-lived and have fast maximum growth rates. Understorey species intergrade with shade-tolerant subcanopy species in terms of growth behaviour; shade-tolerant subcanopy species with opportunistic, shade-tolerant species; and opportunistic, shade-tolerant with shade-intolerant species.

Intraspecific variation in growth rates is lower in short-lived trees (understorey species with uniformly slow growth and shade-intolerant species with uniformly rapid growth) than in the two long-lived groups. These patterns are discussed in the context of tree ecophysiology and forest light environments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Ashton, P. S. 1981. The need for information regarding tree age and growth in tropical forests. Pp. 36 in Bormann, F. H. & Berlyn, G. (eds). Age and growth rate of tropical trees: new directions for re search. Bulletin No. 94, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven. 137 pages.Google Scholar
Bazzaz, F. A & Pickett, S. T. A. 1980. Physiological ecology of tropical succession: a comparative review. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11:287310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bormann, F. H. & Berlyn, G. (eds.) 1981. Age and growth rate of tropical trees: new directions for research. Bulletin No. 94, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven. 137 pages.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, W. S., Cole, D. W., Reikerk, H & Gessel, S. P. 1972. Geology and soils of com-parative ecosystem study sreas, Costa Rica. Tropical Forestry Series Contribution No. 11, College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Brown, W. H. 1919. Vegetation of Philippine mountains. Bureau of Science, Manila.Google Scholar
Coster, C. 19271928. Zur Anatomie und Physiologie der Zuwachszonen und Jahresringbildung in den Tropen. Annates du Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg 37:49160, 38:1–114.Google Scholar
Daubenmire, R 1972. Phenology and other characteristics of tropical semi-deciduous forest in north western Costa Rica. Journal of Ecology 60:147170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetcher, N., Oberbauer, S. F., Rojas, G. & Strain, B. 1985. Effects of light regime on photo-synthesis and growth in seedlings of tropical rain forest trees. Revista de Biologia Tropical (in press).Google Scholar
HallÉ, F. & Martin, R. 1968. Etude de la croissance rhythmique chez l'Hévéa (Hevea brasiliensis Müll. Arg. Euphorbiacées-Crotonoidées). Adansonia (N.S.) 8:475503.Google Scholar
Hartshorn, G. S. 1972. The ecological life history and population dynamics of Pentaclethra macro-loba, a tropical wet forest dominant and Stryphnodendron excelsum, an occasional associate. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Hartshorn, G. S. 1975. A matrix model of tree population dynamics. Pp. 4151 in Golley, F. B. & Medina, E. (eds). Tropical ecological systems. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartshorn, G. S. 1978. Tree fails and tropical forest dynamics. Pp. 617638 in Tomlinson, P. B. & Zimmermann, M. H. (eds). Tropical trees as living systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hartshorn, G. S. 1983. Plants: introduction. Pp. 118157 in janzen, D. H. (ed.). Costa Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 816 pages.Google Scholar
Holdridge, L. R 1967. Life zone ecology (Revised edition). Tropical Science Center, San José, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
Holdridge, L. R, Grenke, W. C, Hatheway, W. H., Liang, T. & Tosi, J. A. Jr, eds. 1971. Forest environments in tropical life zones: a pilot study. Pergamon Press, Oxford. 747 pages.Google Scholar
Janos, D. P. 1975. Effects of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae on lowland tropical rainforest trees. Pp. 437446 in Sanders, F. E., Mosse, B. & Tinker, P. B. (eds). Endomycorrhizas. Academic Press, London. 626 pages.Google Scholar
Janos, D. P. 1980. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae affect tropical rain forest plant growth. Ecology 61:151162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, E. W. 19551956. Ecological studies in the rain forest of southern Nigeria. IV. The plateau forest of the Okomu Forest Reserve. Parts I and IL Journal of Ecology 43:546594, 44:83–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keay, R. W. J. 1961. Increment in the Okomu Forest Reserve, Benin. Nigerian Forestry Information Bulletin (New Series) 11:334.Google Scholar
Kira, T., Ogawa, H., Yoda, K. & Ogino, K. 1967. Comparative ecological studies on three main types of forest vegetation in Thailand. IV. Dry matter production, with special reference to the Khao Chong rain forest. Nature and Life in Southeast Asia 5:149174.Google Scholar
Lang, G. E. & Knight, D. H. 1983. Tree growth, mortality, recruitment, and canopy gap formation during a 10-year period in a tropical moist forest. Ecology 64:10751080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebrun, J. 1936. La forêt equatoriale congolaise. Bulletin d'agriculture de la Congo Beige 27:163192.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D., Lieberman, M., Peralta, R. & Hartshorn, G. S. 1985a. Mortality patterns and stand turnover rates in wet tropical forest in Costa Rica. Journal of Ecology (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, M. & Lieberman, D. 1985. Simulation of growth curves from periodic increment data. Ecology 66:632635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, M. & Lieberman, D., Hartshorn, G. S. & Peralta, R. 1985b. Small-scale altitu-dinal variation in lowland wet tropical forest vegetation. Journal of Ecology 73:505516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longman, K. A. & Jenİk, J. 1974. Tropical forest and its environment. Longman Group Ltd, London. 196 pages.Google Scholar
Meyer, H. A. 1942. Methods of forest growth determination. Pennsylvania State College of Agricul-ture Bulletin 435.Google Scholar
Nicholson, D. L 1965. A study of virgin forest near Sandakan, North Borneo. Pp. 6787 in Sympo-sium on ecological research in humid tropics vegetation. UNESCO, Kuching, Sarawak.Google Scholar
Oberbauer, S. F. & Strain, B. R. 1984. Photosynthesis and successional status of Costa Rican rain forest trees. Photosynthesis Research 5:227232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogden, J. 1981. Dendrochronological studies and the determination of tree ages in the Australian tropics. Journal of Biogeography 8:405420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osmaston, H. A. 1956. Determination of age/girth and similar relationships in tropical forestry. Empire Forestry Review 35:193197.Google Scholar
Parker, G. G. Nutrient loss and recapture following felling of tropical hillslope forests. Ph.D. disser-tation, University of Georgia, Athens.Google Scholar
Primack, R. B., Ashton, P. S., Chai, P. & Lee, H. S. 1985. Growth rates and population structure of Moraceae trees in Sarawak, East Malaysia. Ecology 66:577588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raich, J. W. 1980. Carbon budget of a tropical soil under mature wet forest and young vegetation. M.S. thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Redhead, J. F. & Taylor, D. A. H. 1970. The age of Entandrophragma cylindricum (Sprague). Journal of the West African Science Association 15:19.Google Scholar
Richards, P. W. 1952. The tropical rain forest. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 450 pages.Google Scholar
Studhalter, R. A., Clock, W. S. & Agerter, S. R. 1963. Tree growth: some historical chapters. Botanical Review 29:245365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaine, M. D. & Hall, J. B. 1985. Forests. In Lawson, G. W. (ed.). Plant ecology in West Africa: systems and processes. J. Wiley, New York (in press).Google Scholar
Weaver, P. L. 1979. Tree growth in several tropical forests of Puerto Rico. US Department of Agricul-ture Forest Service Research Paper SO–152.Google Scholar
Whitmore, T. C. 1975. Tropical rain forests of the Far East. Oxford University Press, London. 282 pages.Google Scholar