Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:22:03.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental correlates of herpetofaunal diversity in Costa Rica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2010

David Laurencio  and
Lee A. Fitzgerald
David Laurencio*
Affiliation:
Section of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, MS 2258, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2258, USA
Lee A. Fitzgerald
Affiliation:
Section of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, MS 2258, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2258, USA
*
1Corresponding author. Current address: Department of Biological Sciences, 331 Funchess Hall, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Disentangling local and historical factors that determine species diversity patterns at multiple spatial scales is fundamental to elucidating processes that govern ecological communities. Here we investigated how environmental correlates may influence diversity at local and regional scales. Primarily utilizing published species lists, amphibian and reptile alpha and beta diversity were assessed at 17 well-surveyed sites distributed among ecoregions throughout Costa Rica. The degree to which regional species diversity patterns were related to environmental variables and geographic distance was determined using Canonical Correspondence Analysis and Mantel tests. Amphibian alpha diversity was highest in lowland Pacific sites (mean = 43.3 species) and lowest at the high elevation site (9 species). Reptile alpha diversity values were high for both lowland Atlantic (mean = 69.5 species) and lowland Pacific (mean = 67 species) sites and lowest for the high elevation site (8 species). We found high species turnover between local sites and ecoregions, demonstrating the importance of beta diversity in the determination of regional diversity. For both amphibians and reptiles, beta diversity was highest between the high-elevation site and all others, and lowest among lowland sites within the same ecoregion. The effect of geographic distance on beta diversity was minor. Ecologically significant climatic variables related to rain, temperature, sunshine and insolation were found to be important determinants of local and regional diversity for both amphibians and reptiles in Costa Rica.

Keywords

alphaabiotic factorsamphibiansbetaCosta Ricalocal species richnessreptiles
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 26 , Issue 5 , September 2010 , pp. 521 - 531
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

BARRANTES, J. A., LIAO, A. & ROSALES, A. 1985. Atlas climatológico de Costa Rica. Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería e Instituto Meteorológico Nacional, San José. 29 pp.Google Scholar
BOLAÑOS, F. & EHMCKE, J. 1996. Anfibios y reptiles de la Reserva Biológica San Ramón, Costa Rica. Revista Pensamiento Actual 2:107–112.Google Scholar
BROWN, J. H. & LOMOLINO, M. V. 1998. Biogeography. (Second edition). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland. 691 pp.Google Scholar
BURGER, R. M. 2001. The herpetofauna of Caño Palma Biological Station, Tortuguero, Costa Rica. Bulletin of the Chicago Herpetological Society 36:243–253.Google Scholar
CONDIT, R., PITMAN, N., LEIGH, E. G., CHAVE, J., TERBORGH, J., FOSTER, R. B., NUNEZ, P., AGUILAR, S., VALENCIA, R., VILLA, G., MULLER-LANDAU, H. C., LOSOS, E. & HUBBELL, S. P. 2002. Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Science 295:666–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CROWE, T. M. 1990. A quantitative analysis of patterns of distribution, species richness and endemism in southern African vertebrates. Pp. 145–160 in Peters, G. & Hutterer, R. (eds.). Vertebrates in the tropics. Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn.Google Scholar
CRUZ, F. B., FITZGERALD, L. A., ESPINOZA, R. E. & SCHULTE, J. A. 2005. The importance of phylogenetic scale in tests of Bergmann's and Rapoport's rules: lessons from a clade of South American lizards. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18:1559–1574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CURRIE, D. J. 1991. Energy and large-scale patterns of animal- and plant-species richness. The American Naturalist 137:27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DONNELLY, M. A. 1994. Amphibian diversity and natural history. Pp. 199–209 in McDade, L. A., Bawa, K. S., Hespenheide, H. A. & Hartshorn, G. S. (eds.). La Selva: ecology and history of a neotropical rain forest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
DUELLMAN, W. E. 1966. The Central American herpetofauna: an ecological perspective. Copeia 1966:700–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EVANS, S. E. 1999. The green republic: a conservation history of Costa Rica. University of Texas Press, Austin. 335 pp.Google Scholar
FITZGERALD, L. A., CRUZ, F. B. & PEROTTI, G. 1999. Phenology of a lizard assemblage in the dry Chaco of Argentina. Journal of Herpetology 33:526–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GENTRY, A. H. 1988. Changes in plant community diversity and floristic composition on environmental and geographical gradients. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 75:1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GOMEZ, L. D. 1986. Vegetación de Costa Rica. Editorial Universidad Estatal a Distancia, San José. 327 pp.Google Scholar
GUYER, C. 1994. The reptile fauna: diversity and ecology. Pp. 210–216 in McDade, L. A., Bawa, K. S., Hespenheide, H. A. & Hartshorn, G. S. (eds.). La Selva: ecology and history of a neotropical rain forest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
HAYES, M. P., POUNDS, J. A. & TIMMERMAN, W. W. 1989. An annotated list and guide to the amphibians and reptiles of Monteverde, Costa Rica. Herpetological Circulars 17:1–67.Google Scholar
HILLMAN, P. E. 1969. Habitat specificity in three sympatric species of Ameiva (Reptilia: Teiidae). Ecology 50:476–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOLDRIDGE, L. R. 1967. Life zone ecology. Tropical Science Center, San Jose, Costa Rica. 206 pp.Google Scholar
HUEY, R. B. & SLATKIN, M. 1976. Cost and benefits of lizard thermoregulation. Quarterly Review of Biology 51:363–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HUEY, R. B., BENNETT, A. F., JOHN-ALDER, H. & NAGY, K. A. 1984. Locomotor capacity and foraging behaviour of Kalahari lacertid lizards. Animal Behaviour 32:41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LAURENCIO, D. 2009. Amphibians and reptiles from Reserva Natural Absoluta Cabo Blanco, Puntarenas Province, Costa Rica. Checklist 5:446–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LAURENCIO, D. & MALONE, J. H. 2009. The amphibians and reptiles of Parque Nacional Carara, a transitional herpetofaunal assemblage in Costa Rica. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 4:120–131.Google Scholar
LOMOLINO, M. V. 2001. Elevation gradients of species-density: historical and prospective views. Global Ecology and Biogeography 10:3–13.Google Scholar
MACARTHUR, R. H. 1965. Patterns of species diversity. Biological Reviews 40:510–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MACARTHUR, R. H. & MACARTHUR, J. W. 1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42:594–598.Google Scholar
MANLY, B. F. J. 1997. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. (Second edition). Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton. 424 pp.Google Scholar
MCDIARMID, R. W. & SAVAGE, J. M. 2005. The herpetofauna of the Rincón Area, Península de Osa, a Central American lowland evergreen forest site. Pp. 366–427 in Donnelly, M. A., Crother, B. I., Guyer, C., Wake, M. H. & White, M. E. (eds.). Ecology and evolution in the tropics: a herpetological perspective. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
MCGARIGAL, K., CUSHMAN, S. & STAFFORD, S. 2000. Multivariate statistics for wildlife and ecology research. Springer-Verlag, New York. 283 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'NEILL, E. M. & MENDELSON, J. R. 2004. The taxonomy of Costa Rican toads referred to Bufo melanochlorus Cope, with the description of a new species. Journal of Herpetology 38:487–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OWEN, J. G. 1989. Patterns of herpetofaunal species richness: relation to temperature, precipitation, and variance in elevation. Journal of Biogeography 16:141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PIANKA, E. R. 1966a. Convexity, desert lizards, and spatial heterogeneity. Ecology 47:1055–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PIANKA, E. R. 1966b. Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: a review of concepts. American Naturalist 100:33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PIANKA, E. R. & SCHALL, J. J. 1981. Species densities of terrestrial vertebrates in Australia. Pp. 1675–1694 in Keast, A. (ed.). Ecological biogeography of Australia. Dr W. Junk, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
POUGH, F. H. 1980. The advantages of ectothermy for tetrapods. The American Naturalist 115:92–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
QIAN, H., WANG, X., WANG, S. & LI, Y. 2007. Environmental determinants of amphibian and reptile species richness in China. Ecography 30:471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RAVEN, P. H. & WILSON, E. O. 1992. A fifty-year plan for biodiversity surveys. Science 258:1099–1100.Google ScholarPubMed
RICKLEFS, R. E. 2006. Evolutionary diversification and the origin of the diversity–environment relationship. Ecology 87:S3–S13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RICKLEFS, R. E. & SCHLUTER, D. (eds.) 1993. Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 414 pp.Google Scholar
RODRIGUEZ, M. A., BELMONTES, J. A. & HAWKINS, B. A. 2005. Energy, water and large-scale patterns of reptile and amphibian species richness in Europe. Acta Oecologica 28:65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROGERS, J. S. 1976. Species density and taxonomic diversity of Texas amphibians and reptiles. Systematic Zoology 25:26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROSENZWEIG, M. L. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 458 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SASA, M. & SOLÓRZANO, A. 1995. The reptiles and amphibians of Santa Rosa Nacional Park, Costa Rica, with comments about the herpetofauna of xerophytic areas. Herpetological Natural History 3:113–126.Google Scholar
SAVAGE, J. M. 2002. The amphibians and reptiles of Costa Rica: a herpetofauna between two continents, between two seas. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 954 pp.Google Scholar
SAVAGE, J. M. & WAKE, M. H. 2001. Reevaluation of the status of taxa of Central American caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona), with comments on their origin and evolution. Copeia 2001:52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHALL, J. J. & PIANKA, E. R. 1977. Species densities of reptiles and amphibians on the Iberian Peninsula. Doñana, Acta Vertebrata 4:27–34.Google Scholar
SCOTT, J. M., HEGLUND, P. J., MORRISON, M. L., HAUFLER, J. B., RAPHAEL, M. G., WALL, W. A. & SAMSON, F. B. 2002. Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, DC. 840 pp.Google Scholar
SCOTT, N. J., SAVAGE, J. M. & ROBINSON, D. C. 1983. Checklist of reptiles and amphibians of Costa Rica. Pp. 367–374 in Janzen, D. (ed.). Costa Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
SNEATH, P. H. A. & SOKAL, R. R. 1973. Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practices of numerical classification. W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco. 588 pp.Google Scholar
SOININEN, J., MCDONALD, R. & HILLEBRAND, H. 2007. The distance decay of similarity in ecological communities. Ecography 30:2–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SOULÉ, M. E. 1986. Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland. 584 pp.Google Scholar
VAN RENSBURG, B. J., CHOWN, S. L. & GASTON, K. J. 2002. Species richness, environmental correlates, and spatial scale: a test using South African birds. American Naturalist 159:566–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VARGAS ULATE, G. 1992. Cartografía fitogeográfica de la Reserva Biológica de Carara. Editorial de la Universidad de Costa Rica, San José. 47 pp.Google Scholar
WHITTAKER, R. H. 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ZUG, G. R., VITT, L. J. & CALDWELL, J. P. 2001. Herpetology. An introductory biology of amphibians and reptiles. (Second edition). Academic Press, San Diego. 630 pp.Google Scholar