Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:40:31.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of patch size on liana diversity and distributions in the tropical montane evergreen forests of the Nilgiri Mountains, southern India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2014

Dharmalingam Mohandass*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (XTBG), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Mengla County, Yunnan 666303, P.R.China
Alice C. Hughes
Affiliation:
Centre for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (XTBG), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Mengla County, Yunnan 666303, P.R.China
Mason Campbell
Affiliation:
Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science (T.E.S.S.), School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
Priya Davidar
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Pondicherry University, Kalapet, Pondicherry – 605 014, India
*
1Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Abstract:

We investigate the effect of patch size on liana diversity and distribution in 19 patches of montane evergreen forest in the Nilgiri hills, Western Ghats, southern India. Additionally, we examined how liana species richness and community assemblage in both edge (within 10 m of the forest edge) and interior regions of forest patches respond to patch size, in order to infer the impact of forest expansion or reduction on the liana communities. A total of 1276 woody liana individuals of 15 species were identified, belonging to 10 genera and nine families. Total species richness of lianas was significantly positively related to forest-patch area, both when analysed for the entire patch, in addition to both core and edge regions when examined separately. Species richness of larger lianas also showed a significant positive relationship with increasing forest patch area. Community assemblage varied with respect to forest edge, with shade-dependent species only occurring in interior patch regions, shade-averse species in edge regions, and shade-tolerant species occurring throughout. Disturbance also played a role in determining the response of liana diversity to patch size, with heavily disturbed patches showing no relationship between patch size and diversity, whereas positive relationships exist in low to moderately disturbed patches. The most significant result is the change in liana community composition between small and larger fragments. Many species present in smaller patches are also present in edge zones of larger fragments. This suggests that lianas are important structural components of montane forest ecosystems, and their compositional patterns are possibly driven by succession. Moreover, this study reveals the importance of edge effect and patch size in influencing liana species richness and compositional patterns.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ADDO-FORDJOUR, P., DUAH, P. E. & AGBESI, D. K. K. 2013. Factors influencing liana species richness and structure following anthropogenic disturbance in a tropical forest, Ghana. ISRN Forestry. doi: 10.1155/2013/920370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AGRA, H. & NÉEMAN, G. 2012. Composition and diversity of herbaceous patches in woody vegetation: the effects of grazing, soil seed bank, patch spatial properties and scale. Flora 207:310317.Google Scholar
ANBARASHAN, M. & PARTHASARATHY, N. 2013. Diversity and ecology of lianas in tropical dry evergreen forests on the Coromandel Coast of India under various disturbance regimes. Flora 208:2232.Google Scholar
CANER, L., LO SEEN, D., GUNNELL, Y., RAMESH, B. R. & BOURGEON, G. 2007. Spatial heterogeneity of land cover response to climatic change in the Nilgiri highlands (southern India) since the last glacial maximum. Holocene 17:195205.Google Scholar
CARUSO, A., RUDOLPHI, J. & RYDIN, H. 2011. Positive edge effects on forest-interior cryptogams in clear-cuts. PLoS ONE 6: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027936.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ECHEVERRÍA, C., NEWTON, A. C., LARA, A., REY-BENAYAS, J. M. & COOMES, D. A. 2007. Impacts of forest fragmentation on species composition and forest structure in the temperate landscape of southern Chile. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16:426439.Google Scholar
ESTAVILLO, C., PARDINI, R. & BERNARDO, D. A., ROCHA, P. L. 2013. Forest loss and the biodiversity threshold: an evaluation considering species habitat requirements and the use of matrix habitats. PLoS ONE 8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EWERS, R. M. & DIDHAM, R. K. 2006. Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biological Reviews 81:117142.Google Scholar
FARMILO, B. J., NIMMO, D. G. & MORGAN, J. W. 2013. Pine plantations modify local conditions in forest fragments in southeastern Australia: insights from a fragmentation experiment. Forest Ecology and Management 305:264272.Google Scholar
FYSON, P. F. 1932. The flora of the south Indian hills. Volumes 1–2. Government Press, Madras.Google Scholar
GAMBLE, J. S. & FISCHER, C. E. C. 1915–1935. Flora of the Presidency of Madras. Volumes 1–3. Adlard and Son, London.Google Scholar
GERWING, J. J. 2006. The influence of reproductive traits on liana abundance 10 years after conventional and reduced-impact logging in the eastern Brazilian Amazon. Forest Ecology and Management 221:8390.Google Scholar
GIGNAC, L. D. & DALE, M. R. T. 2007. Effects of size, shape, and edge on vegetation in remnants of the upland boreal mixed-wood forest in agro-environments of Alberta, Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany 85:273284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GONZALEZ, M., LADET, S., DECONCHAT, M., CABANETTES, A., ALARD, D. & BALENT, G. 2010. Relative contribution of edge and interior zones to patch size effect on species richness: an example for woody plants. Forest Ecology and Management 259:266274.Google Scholar
HARPER, K. A., MACDONALD, S. E., BURTON, P. J., CHEN, J. Q., BROSOFSKE, K. D., SAUNDERS, S. C., EUSKIRCHEN, E. S., ROBERTS, D., JAITEH, M. S. & ESSEEN, P. A. 2005. Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Biology 19:768782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HILL, J. L. & CURRAN, P. J. 2003. Area, shape and isolation of tropical forest fragments: effects on tree species diversity and implications for conservation. Journal of Biogeography 30:13911403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LAURANCE, W. F. 2008. Theory meets reality: how habitat fragmentation research has transcended island biogeographic theory. Biological Conservation 141:17311744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LAURANCE, W. F. & YENSEN, E. 1991. Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats. Biological Conservation 55:7792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LAURANCE, W. F., PEREZ-SALICRUP, D., DELAMONICA, P., FEARNSIDE, P. M., D’ANGELO, S., JEROZOLINSKI, A., POHL, L. & LOVEJOY, T. E. 2001. Rain forest fragmentation and the structure of Amazonian liana communities. Ecology 82:105116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LAURANCE, W. F., LOVEJOY, T. E., VASCONCELOS, H. L., BRUNA, E. M., DIDHAM, R. K., STOUFFER, P. C., GASCON, C., BIERREGAARD, R. O., LAURANCE, S. G. & SAMPIAO, E. 2002. Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: a 22-year investigation. Conservation Biology 16:605618.Google Scholar
LAURANCE, W. F., ANA, S., ANDRADE, A. S., MAGRACH, A., CAMARGO, J. C., VALSKO, J. J., CAMPBELL, M., PHILIP, M., FEARNSIDE, P. M., EDWARDS, W., LOVEJOY, T. E. & LAURANCE, S. G. 2014. Long-term changes in liana abundance and forest dynamics in undisturbed Amazonian forests. Ecology 95:16041611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LAWESSON, J. E., DE BLUST, G., GRASHOF, C., FIRBANK, L., HONNAY, O., HERMY, M., HOBITZ, P. & JENSEN, L. M. 1998. Species diversity and area relationships in Danish beech forests. Forest Ecology and Management 106:235245.Google Scholar
LIU, W.-D., ZANG, R.-G., DING, Y. & ZHANG, W.-Y. 2013. Species-area relationships of different plant functional groups in tropical monsoon rainforests (Hainan Island, China). Polish Journal of Ecology 61:311.Google Scholar
MACARTHUR, R. H. & WILSON, E. O. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 203 pp.Google Scholar
MACDONALD, R. L., CHEN, H. Y. H., PALIK, B. P. & PREPAS, E. E. 2014. Influence of harvesting on understory vegetation along a boreal riparian-upland gradient. Forest Ecology and Management 312:138147.Google Scholar
MATTHEW, K. M. 1999. The flora of the Palni Hills, South India. Volumes 1–3. The Rapinat Herbarium, Thiruchirapalli.Google Scholar
MOHANDASS, D. 2007. Plant diversity and forest dynamics in montane evergreen forest (shola) of the Nilgiri Mountains, southern India. Ph.D. thesis, Pondicherry University, Puducherry.Google Scholar
MOHANDASS, D. & DAVIDAR, P. 2010. The relationship between area, and vegetation structure and diversity in montane forest (shola) patches in southern India. Plant Ecology and Diversity 3:6776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MOHANDASS, D., DAVIDAR, P., SOMASUNDARAM, S., VIJAYAN, L. & BENG, K. C. (in press). Influence of disturbance regime on liana species composition, density and basal area of the tropical montane evergreen forest (shola) of the Nilgiri Mountains. Tropical Ecology 56.Google Scholar
MORGAN, J. W., WONG, N. K. & CUTLER, S. C. 2011. Life-form species-area relationships in a temperate eucalyptus woodland community. Plant Ecology 212:10471055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MUTHURAMKUMAR, S. & PARTHASARATHY, N. 2000. Alpha diversity of lianas in a tropical evergreen forest in the Anamalais, Western Ghats, India. Diversity and Distributions 6:114.Google Scholar
MUTHUPERUMAL, C. & PARTHASARATHY, N. 2009. Angiosperms, climbing plants in tropical forests of southern Eastern Ghats, Tamil Nadu, India. Check List 5:92111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PUYRAVAUD, J.-P. & DAVIDAR, P. 2013. The Nilgiris Biosphere Reserve: an unrealized vision for conservation. Tropical Conservation Science 6:468476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PUYRAVAUD, J.-P., DUFOUR, C. & ARAVAJY, S. 2003. Rain forest expansion mediated by successional processes in vegetation thickets in the Western Ghats of India. Journal of Biogeography 30:10671080.Google Scholar
RANGEL, T. F., DINIZ-FILHO, J. A. F. & BINI, L. M. 2010. SAM: a comprehensive application for Spatial Analysis in Macroecology. Ecography 33:4650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RICE, K., BROKAW, N. & THOMPSON, J. 2004. Liana abundance in a Puerto Rican forest. Forest Ecology and Management 190:3341.Google Scholar
RIES, L., FLETCHER, R. J., BATTIN, J. & SISK, T. D. 2004. Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35:491522.Google Scholar
SCHNITZER, S. A. & BONGERS, F. 2002. The ecology of lianas and their role in forests. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:223230.Google Scholar
SCHNITZER, S. A. & BONGERS, F. 2011. Increasing liana abundance and biomass in tropical forests: emerging patterns and putative mechanisms. Ecology Letters 14:397406.Google Scholar
WULF, M. & KOLK, J. 2014. Plant species richness of very small forests related to patch configuration, quality, heterogeneity and history. Journal of Vegetation Science. doi: 10.1111/jvs.12172.Google Scholar
YINEGER, H., SCHMIDT, D. J. & HUGHES, J. M. 2014. Genetic structuring of remnant forest patches in an endangered medicinal tree in North-western Ethiopia. BMC Genetics 5: 31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-15-31.Google Scholar
ZMIHORSKI, M., CHYLARECKI, P., REJT, L. & MAZGAJSKI, T. D. 2010. The effects of forest patch size and ownership structure on tree stand characteristics in a highly deforested landscape of central Poland. European Journal of Forest Research 129:393400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar