Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:13:11.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does tropical forest fragmentation affect plant anti-herbivore defensive and nutritional traits?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2016

Betsabé Ruiz-Guerra ,
Roger Guevara ,
Noé Velázquez-Rosas  and
Rodolfo Dirzo
Betsabé Ruiz-Guerra*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ecología, Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico04510 D.F. Instituto de Ecología AC, Red de Ecología Evolutiva, Carretera antigua a Coatepec 351, El Haya, Xalapa 91070, Mexico
Roger Guevara
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ecología AC, Red de Ecología Evolutiva, Carretera antigua a Coatepec 351, El Haya, Xalapa 91070, Mexico
Noé Velázquez-Rosas
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigaciones Tropicales, Universidad Veracruzana, Ex Hacienda Lucas Martín priv. Araucarias, C.P. 91110, Xalapa, México
Rodolfo Dirzo
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ecología, Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico04510 D.F.
*
1Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Leaf traits of tropical tree species are known to operate as intrinsic determinants of insect herbivory. However, we know little about how habitat fragmentation affects these traits and what, if any, are the consequences of this process on herbivory. We tested the effects of forest fragmentation on the leaf traits of sapling of four light-demanding species: Acalypha diversifolia, Hampea nutricia, Myriocarpa longipes, Siparuna thecaphora, and two shade-tolerant species: Pseudolmedia glabrata and Garcinia intermedia, in Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. We also conducted an acceptability assay with a generalist herbivore Spodoptera frugiperda. Plant traits did not change with forest fragmentation, but did with plant regeneration mode and species identity. Light-demanding species had significantly higher water content, nitrogen concentration and specific leaf area than shade-tolerant species. The latter had significantly higher leaf strength, carbon concentration and carbon:nitrogen ratio. Acceptability was affected by fragmentation but only in P. glabrata; plant tissue from forest fragments was consumed 2.6 times more than that from continuous forest. We conclude that forest fragmentation did not affect leaf traits in this site.

Keywords

defenceforest fragmentationleaf traitsLos Tuxtlasshade-tolerancetropical rain forest
Type
Short Communication
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , March 2016 , pp. 162 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

AGUIRRE, A. & DIRZO, R. 2008. Effects of habitat fragmentation on pollinator abundance and fruit set on an abundant understory palm in a Mexican tropical forest. Biological Conservation 141:375–384.Google Scholar
BRENES-ARGUEDAS, T. & COLEY, P. D. 2005. Phenotypic variation and spatial structure of secondary chemistry in a natural population of a tropical trees species. Oikos 108:410–420.Google Scholar
FÁVERI, S. B., VASCONCELOS, H. L. & DIRZO, R. 2008. Effects of Amazonian forest fragmentation on the interaction between plants, insect herbivores, and their natural enemies. Journal of Tropical Ecology 24:57–64.Google Scholar
HOUTER, N. C. & PONS, T. L. 2012. Ontogenetic changes in leaf traits of tropical rainforest trees differing in juvenile light requirement. Oecologia 169:33–45.Google Scholar
MARTÍNEZ-GARZA, C. & HOWE, H. 2005. Developmental strategy or immediate responses in leaf traits of tropical tree species. International Journal of Plant Sciences 166:41–48.Google Scholar
POORTER, L., VAN DE PLASSCHE, M., WILLEMS, S. & BOOT, R. G. A. 2004. Leaf traits and herbivory rates of tropical tree species differing in successional status. Plant Biology 6:746–754.Google Scholar
POPMA, J., BONGERS, F. & WERGER, M. J. A. 1992. Gap-dependence and leaf characteristics of trees in a tropical lowland rain forest in Mexico. Oikos 63:207–214.Google Scholar
ROZENDAAL, D. M. A., HURTADO, V. H. & POORTER, L. 2006. Plasticity in leaf traits of 38 tropical tree species in response to light; relationship with light demand and adult stature. Functional Ecology 20:207–216.Google Scholar
RUIZ-GUERRA, B., GUEVARA, R., MARIANO, N. & DIRZO, R. 2010. Insect herbivory declines with forest fragmentation and covaries with plant regeneration mode: evidence from a Mexican tropical rain forest. Oikos 119:317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SANSON, G., READ, J., ARANWELA, N., CLISSOLD, F. & PEETERS, P. 2001. Measurement of leaf biomechanical properties in studies of herbivory: opportunities, problems and procedures. Austral Ecology 26:535–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TYLIANAKIS, J. M., DIDHAM, R. K., BASCOMPTE, J. & WARDLE, D. A. 2008. Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology Letters 11:1351–1363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VALLADARES, F., WRIGHT, J. S., LASSO, E., KITAJIMA, K. & PEARCY, R. W. 2000. Plastic phenotypic responses to light of 16 congeneric shrubs from a Panamanian rainforest. Ecology 81:1925–1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VALLADARES, F., GIANOLI, E. & GÓMEZ, J. M. 2007. Ecological limits to plant phenotypic plasticity. New Phytologist 176:749–763.Google Scholar
WATERMAN, P. G. & MOLE, S. 1994. Analysis of phenolic plant metabolites. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. 66–103 pp.Google Scholar
WIRTH, R., MEYER, S. T., LEAL, I. R. & TABARELLI, M. 2008. Plant herbivore interactions at the forest edge. Progress in Botany 69:424–448.Google Scholar