Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:53:44.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical plant-soil relationships in tropical forests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Frank B. Golley
Affiliation:
Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA

Abstract

Plant and soil samples collected from four tropical forest areas were used to examine the correlation between the chemical abundances in soil and vegetation. On fertile soils in Panama and Colombia soil concentrations of copper, manganese, cobalt and zinc were correlated with plant concentrations. Calcium, caesium, iron, lead, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, sodium and strontium-concentrations were not correlated. Factor analysis of plant chemistry at nine sites showed very little commonality between sites, even of vegetation belonging to the same plant association. A copper, manganese, cobalt, zinc factor was not recognized except in one case. A similar study of plant soil correlation in Colombia supported the conclusions from Panama; for most elements there was little evidence for significant correlation between plant and soil concentrations.

Analysis of plant-soil relationships on very infertile latosols with terra firme forest in the Amazon at San Carlos de Rio Negro, Venezuela and Manaus, Brazil revealed a soil effect on the statistical distributions of the elements in the plant biomass. This effect was strongest on the least fertile site at Manaus and was strongest for essential elements. The pattern of chemical distributions appears to be due to the fact that some species are capable of concentrating high levels of elements even under conditions of very low supply in the substrate.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Brooks, R. R. 1983. Biological methods of prospecting for minerals. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 322 pp.Google Scholar
Brunig, E. F. 1974. Ecological studies in the kerangas forests of Sarawak and Brunei. Borneo Litera ture Bureau, Sarawak Forest Department. 237 ppGoogle Scholar
Chapin, F. L. III 1980. The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11:233260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenery, M. & Sporne, K. E. 1976. A note on the evolutionary status of aluminum-accumulations among dicotyledons. New Phytologist 76:551554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garten, T. Jr 1978. Multivariate perspectives on the ecology of plant mineral element composition. American Naturalist 112(985):533544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golley, F. B. 1983. Nutrient cycling and nutrient conservation. Pp. 137–156 in Golley, F. B. (ed.). Tropical rainforest ecosystems. Elsevier Scientific Publ. Co., Amsterdam. 381 pp.Google Scholar
Golley, F. B., Mcginnis, J. T., Clements, R. G., Child, G. I & Duever, M. J. 1975. Mineral cycling in a tropical moist forest ecosystem. University of Georgia Press, Athens. 248 pp.Google Scholar
Golley, F. B. & Richardson, T. 1977. Chemical relationships in tropical forests. Geo-Eco-Trop 1:3544.Google Scholar
Golley, F. B., Richardson, T. & Clements, R. G. 1978. Elemental concentrations in tropical forests and soils of Northwestern Colombia. Biotropica 10:144151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golley, F. B., Yantko, J. & Jordan, C. 1980a. Biogeochemistry of tropical forests: 2. The frequency distribution and mean concentration of selected elements near San Carlos de Rio Negro, Venezuela. Tropical Ecology 21:7180Google Scholar
Golley, F. B., Yantko, J., Richardson, T. & Klinge, H. 1980b. Biogeochemistry of tropical forests: 1. The frequency distribution and mean concentration of selected elements in a forest near Manaus, Brazil. Tropical Ecology 21:5970Google Scholar
Jordan, C. & Herrera, R. 1981. Tropical rain forests: are nutrients really critical? American Naturalist 117:167180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinge, H. 1976. Nahrstoffe, Wasser und Durchwurzelung von Podsolen und Latosolen Unter Tropis-chem Regenwald Bei Manaus/Amazonien. Biogeographica 7:4558.Google Scholar
Lea, R., Ballard, R. & Wells, C. G. 1980. Amounts of nutrients removed from forest soils by two extractants and their relationship to Pinus taeda foliage concentrations. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 11:957967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemee, G. 1961. Effets des caractères du sol sur la localisation de la végétation en zones équatoriale et tropicale humide. In Proceedings of the Symposium on tropical soils and vegetation. (Abidjan). UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
Lillifors, H. W. 1967. On the Kolmogorov-Smirononv test for normality with mean and variance unknown. Journal American Statistical Association 62:399402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medina, E., Herrera, R., Jordan, C. & Klinge, H. 1977. Man and the Amazon rain forest. Nature and Resources 13:46.Google Scholar
Nelson, W. L., Mehlich, A. & Winters, E. 1953. The development, evaluation, and use of soil tests for phosphorus availability. Pp. 153188 in Pierre, W. H. & Norman, A G. (eds). Soil and fertilizer phosphorus in crop nutrition. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Newbery, D. McC & Proctor, J. 1984. Ecological studies in four contrasting lowland rain forests in Gunung Mulu National Park, Sarawak. Journal of Ecology 72:475493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinder, J. & Smith, M. H. 1975. Frequency distributions of radiocesium concentrations in soil and biota. Pp. 107125 in Smith, M. H., Howell, F. G. & Gentry, J. B. (eds). Mineral cycling in south eastern ecosystems. USERDA, Office of Public Affairs, Washington.Google Scholar
Vitousek, P. M. 1984. Litterfall, nutrient cycling, and nutrient limitation in tropical forests. Ecology 65:285298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmore, T. C. 1975. Tropical rain forests of the Far East. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 282 pp.Google Scholar
Zinke, P. J. 1981. Fertility element storage in chaparral vegetation leaf litter, and soil. Unpublished paper in Symposium on dynamics and management of Mediterranean-type ecosystems, San Diego, California. 9 pp.Google Scholar
Zinke, P. J. & Strangenberger, A. G. 1979. Ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir foliage analyses arrayed in probability distributions. Pp. 221225 in Proceedings forest fertilization conference, Alderbrook, Washington University. Washington Institute of Forest Research, Contract No. 40.Google Scholar