Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:59:43.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Buzz pollination – older and more widespread than we think?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Carolyn E. B. Proença
Carolyn E. B. Proença
Affiliation:
Jardim Botânico de Brasília, Selor de Mansões Dom Bosco, 70000 Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

anther morphologybeeBlepharocalyxBombusCampomanesiaCeratilictusCeratinaMeliponaMyrciaMyrtaceaepollinationSiphoneugena
Type
Short Communication
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 115 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Barth, M. O. & Barbosa, A. P. 1972. Catállogo sistemático dos pólens das plantas arbóreas do Brasil meridional. 15. Myrtaceae. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 70(4):467–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, O. C. 1857. Myrtaceae. Flora Brasiliensis 14(1):1–327.Google Scholar
Bond, H. & Brown, W. E. 1979. The exploitation of floral nectar in Eucalyptus incrassata by honcyeaters and honey bees (Apis mellifera). Oecologia 44(1): 105–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, B. 1964. The control of interspecific hybridization in Darwinia. Evolution 18:292–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bughmann, S. L. 1983. Buzz pollination in Angiosperms. Pp. 73–113 in Jones, C. E. & Little, R. J. (eds). Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, Inc., New York. 558 pp.Google Scholar
Carvalho, L. F. 1967. Morfologia de grãos de polem de isótipos de Myrtaceae do estado do Paraná, Brasil. Boletim da Universidade Federal do Paraná 18:1–17.Google Scholar
Crepet, W. L. 1984. Advanced (constant) insect pollination vis a vis angiosperm diversity. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 71:607–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, H. A. & Paton, D. C. 1982. Partitioning of nectar sources in an Australian honeyeater community. Australian Journal of Ecology 7(2):149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankie, G. W., Haber, W. A., Opler, P. A. & Bawa, K. S. 1983. Characteristics and organization of the large bee pollination system in the Costa Rican Dry Forest. Pp. 411–447 in Jones, C. E. & Little, R. J. (eds). Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, Inc., New York. 558 pp.Google Scholar
Friis, E. M. & Crepet, W. L. 1987. Time of appearance of floral features. Pp. 147–179 in Friis, E. M., Chaloner, W. G. & Crane, P. R. (eds). The origin of Angiosperms and their biological consequences. University Press, Cambridge. 358 pp.Google Scholar
Johnson, L. A. & Briggs, B. G. 1984. Myrtales and Myrtaceae – a phylogenetic analysis. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 71:700–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landrum, L. 1984. Taxonomic implications of the discovery of calyptrate species of Myrceugenia (Myrtaceae). Brittonia 36(2):161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landrum, L. 1986. Campomanesia, Pimenta, Blepharocalyx, Legrandium, Acca, Myrrhinum and Luma (Myrtaccae). Flora Neotropica Monograph 45. New York Botanical Garden Press, New York.Google Scholar
Legrand, C. D. 1958. Las especies tropicales del género Gomidesia. Communicaciones Botanicas del Museo de Historia Natural de Montevideo 3(37):1–27.Google Scholar
Lieu, J. & Melhem, T. S. 1973. Palinologia em Myrtaceae. Hoehnea 3:1–11.Google Scholar
McVaugh, R. 1968. The genera of American Myrtaceae – an interim report. Taxon 17(4):354–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michener, C. D. 1965. A classification of the bees of the Australian and Pacific Regions. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 130:1–362.Google Scholar
Michener, C. D. 1979. Biogeography of the bees. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 66:277–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, J. 1984. Significance of fossil pollen for Angiosperm history. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 71(2):419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, P. E. & Sazima, M. 1990. Pollination biology of two species of Kielmeyera (Guttifcrae) from Brazilian cerrado vegetation. Plant Systematics and Evolution 172:35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proença, C. & Gibbs, P. E. In prep. Reproductive biology of eight species of Myrtaceae from Brazil.Google Scholar
Proença, C. 1990. A revision of Siphoneugena Berg (Myrtaceae, Myrteae). Edinburgh Journal of Botany 47:239–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renner, S. 1989. A survey of reproductive biology in neotropical Melastomataceae and Memecylaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 76:496–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stellfeld, C. 1968. Contribuição para a sistemática das Mirtáceas (Myrtoideae). Tribuna Farmacéutica 36(1/4): 3–8.Google Scholar