Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T20:47:04.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Andean bears hunt wild guinea pigs in Colombian paramos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2024

Matthew Hyde*
Affiliation:
Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Center for Human-Carnivore Coexistence, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Sebastian Di Domenico
Affiliation:
Caminantes del Retorno, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
Carlos Avellanada
Affiliation:
Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Center for Human-Carnivore Coexistence, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Angélica Diaz-Pulido
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander Von Humboldt, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia Neotropical Innovation, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
Santiago Chiquito-García
Affiliation:
Neotropical Innovation, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
Ángela Mejía-González
Affiliation:
Graduate Degree Program in Geography and Urban Studies, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Stewart W. Breck
Affiliation:
National Wildlife Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)-Wildlife Services, Fort Collins, CO, USA
*
Corresponding author: Matthew Hyde; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is well documented that Andean bears (Tremarctos ornatus) feed extensively on plants and carrion, but their hunting habits remain understudied. Better understanding and documentation of Andean bear feeding ecology can improve conservation efforts for this vulnerable species. Here, we report an observation of an Andean bear hunting and capturing a wild guinea pig (Cavia aperea) in Chingaza National Natural Park, in Cundinamarca, Colombia. The sighting occurred in January 2023 by a team of conservationists, and we provided photographic evidence and details of the encounter. Our observation suggests that Andean bears are capable hunters of small rodents, indicating that hunting may play a more important role in the ecology of Andean bears than previously appreciated and highlighting the need for a better understanding of this feeding behaviour.

Type
Field Note
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use and/or adaptation of the article.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

The Andean bear is the only extant bear species in South America. This elusive member of the Ursidae family inhabits a large elevation gradient (220 – 4750 m) in ecosystems from northwestern Colombia, west to Venezuela and south to Bolivia (García-Rangel Reference García-Rangel2012) with some evidence of presence in Argentina (Cosse et al. Reference Cosse, del Moral Sachetti, Mannise and Acosta2014; Figure 1). The population of Andean bears is declining, and they are considered Vulnerable by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (Velez-Liendo & García-Rangel Reference Velez-Liendo and García-Rangel2017). Principal threats include preventative and retaliatory killings for crop and livestock losses, habitat loss and fragmentation, and likely climate change (Velez-Liendo & García-Rangel Reference Velez-Liendo and García-Rangel2017, Vela-Vargas et al. Reference Vela-Vargas, Jorgenson, González-Maya and Koprowski2021). Given that Andean bears preferentially select for high montane habitats (Peralvo et al. Reference Peralvo, Cuesta and Manen2005, Rojas-VeraPinto et al. Reference Rojas-Verapinto, Bautista and Selva2022) where climate change threats are especially acute (Cresso et al. Reference Cresso, Clerici, Sanchez and Jaramillo2020), bear diet and feeding ecology may be impacted by altitudinal shifts in plant communities and human encroachment (Rojas-VeraPinto et al. Reference Rojas-Verapinto, Bautista and Selva2022).

Figure 1. Map of the known range of T. ornatus and location of Chingaza Natural National Park.

Sources: IUCN, Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia, Natural Earth, Mapbox.

Andean bears are omnivores, consuming a range of fruits and foliage, with bromeliads and palm trees being dietary staples (Peyton Reference Peyton1980, García-Rangel Reference García-Rangel2012). In high altitude habitats like paramos, a high montane area above the tree line, Andean bears are thought to subsist mainly on Puya plants (Puya spp.), consuming the soft edges of the bottom of the leaves (Peyton Reference Peyton1980, Parra-Romero et al. Reference Parra-Romero, Galindo-Tarazona, González-Maya, Vela-Vargas, Parra-Romero, Galindo-Tarazona, González-Maya and Vela-Vargas2019). There is less known about other food sources for Andean bears, particularly animal protein and how they attain it. Some research demonstrates they will attempt to predate and likely consume mountain tapirs (Castellanos Reference Castellanos2011, Rodriguez-Bolaños et al. Reference Rodriguez-Bolaños, María, Sosa and Lizcano2014, Pisso-Florez et al. Reference Pisso-Florez, Gómez-Lora, Vela-Vargas, Pizo, Bedoya Dorado and Ramírez-Chaves2021) and deer (Cervidae; García-Rangel Reference García-Rangel2012, Vela-Vargas et al. Reference Vela-Vargas, Jorgenson, González-Maya and Koprowski2021) and consume rodents (Rodentia, including from the family Caviidae; Castellanos Reference Castellanos2011, Gonzales et al. Reference Gonzales, Neira-Llerena, Llerena and Zeballos2016). However, there is uncertainty around the predatory capabilities of Andean bears, with some research indicating that meat consumption of wild prey is primarily through scavenging rather than preying on live animals (García-Rangel Reference García-Rangel2012). Taxonomic investigation suggests that omnivorous members of the Ursidae family have exceptionally strong bite force, though this was likely selected to process grasses and other vegetal fibres rather than prey (Sacco & Van Valkenburgh Reference Sacco and van Valkenburgh2004). Andean bears are known to prey on livestock (Goldstein et al. Reference Goldstein, Paisley, Wallace, Jorgenson, Cuesta and Castellanos2006, García-Rangel Reference García-Rangel2012, Velez-Liendo & García-Rangel Reference Velez-Liendo and García-Rangel2017, Vela-Vargas et al. Reference Vela-Vargas, Jorgenson, González-Maya and Koprowski2021), though actual depredation losses are likely lower than perceived because of encountering scavenging bears with carcasses that die of other causes (Goldstein et al. Reference Goldstein, Paisley, Wallace, Jorgenson, Cuesta and Castellanos2006, Parra-Romero et al. Reference Parra-Romero, Galindo-Tarazona, González-Maya, Vela-Vargas, Parra-Romero, Galindo-Tarazona, González-Maya and Vela-Vargas2019). Moreover, little is known about their predatory behaviours and predation rates on wild prey because of their elusive nature (García-Rangel Reference García-Rangel2012).

Species of the Caviidae family (i.e., guinea pigs, cavies and maras), specifically the subfamily of Caviinae, are present throughout much of T. ornatus range in the Andes Mountains. Gonzales et al. (Reference Gonzales, Neira-Llerena, Llerena and Zeballos2016) first reported on the Andean bear consumption of Caviidae through scat samples in highland areas of the Cajamarca and Amazonas provinces of Peru. However, there is no published literature describing the hunting behaviour of Andean bears on wild rodents or other prey species. Better understanding of this behaviour may lead to more informed conservation strategies for Andean bears.

Observation

Chingaza National Natural Park (Chingaza NNP) is a 766 km2 protected area located in the Eastern Andes near the Colombian capital of Bogotá (Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia 2023). The area features high Andean mountain and wetland areas, and sub-Andean humid forest. Chingaza NNP bear density was estimated at 2.9 per 100 km2 in 2020 in the buffer area (Rodríguez et al. Reference Rodríguez, Reyes, Quiñones-Guerrero, Poveda-Gómez, Castillo-Navarro, Duque and Reyes-Amaya2020), and at least 60 bears were known to transit the national park in 2020 (Parra-Romero & González-Maya Reference Parra-Romero and González-Maya2020) (Parra-Romero & González-Maya Reference Parra-Romero and González-Maya2020). Chingaza NNP also hosts 101 mammal species (Parra-Romero & González-Maya Reference Parra-Romero and González-Maya2020), including white-tailed deer (Odocoileus goudotii), little brocket deer (Mazama rufina), puma (Puma concolor), spotted paca (Cuniculus taczanowskii), and 531 bird species (Linares et al. Reference Linares, Acevedo-Charry, Avellaneda, Cortes, Cuervo, Galindo, Hernandez, Pérez-Peña, Pulido, Pulido-Santacruz, Santana, Seeholzer, Sierra-Buitrago, Soto and Laverde2020). Wild guinea pigs (Cavia aperea) are naturally occurring in the park and prefer tall grass habitats near streams and marshes.

On January 18th, 2023, the authors observed a bear of unknown sex at a distance of approximately 300 metres in a lowland riverine area with 60-centimetre-tall grasses in Chingaza NPP (coords: 4.514045, −73.755796). The observation took place at approximately 3,259 metres above sea level in open paramo habitat at 15:00 hours approximately 500 metres from the Chingaza Lagoon area (Figure 1). The bear initially was moving through the riparian area when a member of our party spotted it. The bear stood on its hind legs, seemingly attuning its senses. Its gaze appeared to be directed towards the authors, who were on a hillside overlooking the riparian area by Chingaza Lagoon. This posture indicated the bear was assessing its environment. In a pounce, it descended onto all four limbs, searching among the ground cover. It pounced again and emerged from the tall grass with a small animal in its mouth. Through photographic and video evidence (Figure 2), we verified that it was a wild guinea pig. The bear rapidly retreated to dense shrubs near the river and did not emerge while we were present. In the lower basin area near Chingaza Lagoon, the authors observed small trails through the grasses indicative of guinea pig presence.

Figure 2. An Andean bear of unknown sex carries a captured wild guinea pig in its mouth.

Photo credit: Sebastian Di Domenico.

Conservation implications of understanding hunting strategies

Our observation contributes important natural history information that can improve conservation strategies for Andean bears. Notably, the site of the hunting observation was a riparian area that was restored after cattle grazing affected the composition and structure of vegetation (Vargas Ríos et al. Reference Vargas Ríos, Insuasty, Rojas-Zamora, Castro and Flórez2012). This riparian area provides habitat for guinea pigs, as observed by the authors. It is also where most bear sightings take place in the park, which may be a function of its higher use by tourists and suitable habitat for bears. Further research into fine-scale habitat selection of Andean bears in Chingaza NPP can contribute to understanding behavioural ecology and fitness consequences.

A recent proliferation of bear sightings by tourists may be an opportunity for bear conservation but ought to be monitored carefully. Sustainable wildlife tourism provides financial support to local communities and research funds which can contribute to long-term population viability (Hyde et al. Reference Hyde, Payán, Barragan, Stasiukynas, Rincón, Kendall, Rodríguez, Crooks, Breck and Boron2023). However, care should be taken to ensure that tourism does not affect bear fitness or ecosystem health in Chingaza NPP. Currently, tourism is highly restricted to certain times and limited capacity.

Understanding the behaviour of animals that come into conflict with humans, such as Andean bears, can aid in the creation of conservation strategies. Seasonal variation in resource availability and needs of wildlife are often secondary drivers of conflicts with humans (Mumby & Plotnik Reference Mumby and Plotnik2018). In particular, bears consume livestock on farms surrounding Chingaza NPP. Cattle are grazed with little supervision over extensive areas, therefore bears are undeterred from livestock (Parra-Romero et al. Reference Parra-Romero, Galindo-Tarazona, González-Maya, Vela-Vargas, Parra-Romero, Galindo-Tarazona, González-Maya and Vela-Vargas2019). More research on the temporal trends of animal protein consumption and hunting strategies can help guide the restoration of critical habitats that support native prey and improve efforts for conflict mitigation on surrounding cattle operations.

Conclusions

Our observation provides important insight into the understudied hunting behaviour of Andean bears. The gap in knowledge of their hunting behaviour is an important shortcoming in the understanding of the autecology of Andean Bears. Even small amounts of animal protein can maximize growth in bear species (Robbins et al. Reference Robbins, Fortin, Rode, Farley, Shipley and Felicetti2007). Thus, even though most of the diet of Andean bears is non-animal related (Peyton Reference Peyton1980, García-Rangel Reference García-Rangel2012), such caloric and protein procurement could be an essential part of Andean bear life history strategies. Further research is required to understand behavioural adaptations for hunting and temporal patterns in protein acquisition.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Caminantes del Retorno for guiding the Andean bear-viewing tour.

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or non-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

Castellanos, A (2011) Do Andean bears attack mountain tapirs? International Bear News 20, 4142.Google Scholar
Cosse, M, del Moral Sachetti, JF, Mannise, N and Acosta, M (2014) Genetic evidence confirms presence of Andean bears in Argentina. Ursus 25, 163171. International Association for Bear Research and Management.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cresso, M, Clerici, N, Sanchez, A and Jaramillo, F (2020) Future climate change renders unsuitable conditions for Paramo ecosystems in Colombia. Sustainability 12, 8373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Rangel, S (2012) Andean bear Tremarctos ornatus natural history and conservation. Mammal Review 42, 85119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, I, Paisley, S, Wallace, R, Jorgenson, JP, Cuesta, F and Castellanos, A (2006) Andean bear–livestock conflicts: a review. Ursus 17, 815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzales, FN, Neira-Llerena, J, Llerena, G and Zeballos, H (2016) Small vertebrates in the spectacled bear’s diet (Tremarctos ornatus Cuvier, 1825) in the north of Peru. Revista Peruana de Biología 23, 6166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, M, Payán, E, Barragan, J, Stasiukynas, D, Rincón, S, Kendall, WL, Rodríguez, J, Crooks, KR, Breck, SW and Boron, V (2023) Tourism-supported working lands sustain a growing jaguar population in the Colombian Llanos. Scientific Reports 13, 10408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linares, L, Acevedo-Charry, O, Avellaneda, F, Cortes, O, Cuervo, A, Galindo, -TR, Hernandez, D, Pérez-Peña, S, Pulido, Á, Pulido-Santacruz, P, Santana, D, Seeholzer, G, Sierra-Buitrago, M, Soto, J and Laverde, O (2020) Aves del Parque Nacional Natural Chingaza y zona de amortiguación, Cordillera Oriental de Colombia. Biota Colombiana 21, 117129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumby, HS and Plotnik, JM (2018) Taking the elephants’ perspective: remembering elephant behavior, cognition and ecology in human-elephant conflict mitigation. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 6, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia (2023, May 24 ). Chingaza National Natural Park - Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia.Google Scholar
Parra-Romero, Á, Galindo-Tarazona, R, González-Maya, JF, Vela-Vargas, IM, Parra-Romero, Á, Galindo-Tarazona, R, González-Maya, JF and Vela-Vargas, IM (2019) Not eating alone: Andean bear time patterns and potential social scavenging behaviors. Therya 10, 4953. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parra-Romero, A and González-Maya, JF (2020) Rastros ocultos: Guía de mamíferos del Parque Nacional Natural Chingaza. Bogotá: ProCAT.Google Scholar
Peralvo, MF, Cuesta, F and Manen, F van (2005) Delineating priority habitat areas for the conservation of Andean bears in northern Ecuador. Ursus 16, 222233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peyton, B (1980) Ecology, distribution, and food habits of spectacled bears, Tremarctos ornatus, in Peru. Journal of Mammalogy 61, 639652. [American Society of Mammalogists, Oxford University Press].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisso-Florez, GA, Gómez-Lora, I, Vela-Vargas, IM, Pizo, H, Bedoya Dorado, I and Ramírez-Chaves, HE (2021) What’s on the menu? A presumed attack of Andean bear on a mountain tapir at the Puracé National Natural Park, Colombia. Neotropical Biology and Conservation 16, 1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, CT, Fortin, JK, Rode, KD, Farley, SD, Shipley, LA and Felicetti, LA (2007) Optimizing protein intake as a foraging strategy to maximize mass gain in an omnivore. Oikos 116, 16751682. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, D, Reyes, A, Quiñones-Guerrero, A, Poveda-Gómez, FE, Castillo-Navarro, Y, Duque, R and Reyes-Amaya, NR (2020) Andean bear (Tremarctos ornatus) population density and relative abundance at the buffer zone of the Chingaza National Natural Park, cordillera oriental of the colombian andes. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 60, e20206030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Bolaños, A, María, A, Sosa, M and Lizcano, DJ (2014) Record of a mountain tapir attacked by an Andean bear on a camera trap. Tapir Conservation 23.Google Scholar
Rojas-Verapinto, R, Bautista, C and Selva, N (2022) Living high and at risk: predicting Andean bear occurrence and conflicts with humans in southeastern Peru. Global Ecology and Conservation 36, e02112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacco, T and van Valkenburgh, B (2004) Ecomorphological indicators of feeding behaviour in the bears (Carnivora: Ursidae). Journal of Zoology 263, 4154. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargas Ríos, O, Insuasty, J, Rojas-Zamora, O, Castro, P and Flórez, N (2012) Programa para la restauración ecológica en áreas del Parque Nacional Natural Chingaza. Bogota, DC, 1–31 pp.Google Scholar
Vela-Vargas, IM, Jorgenson, JP, González-Maya, JF and Koprowski, JL (2021) Tremarctos ornatus (Carnivora: Ursidae). Mammalian Species 53, 7894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velez-Liendo, X and García-Rangel, S (2017) Tremarctos ornatus (errata version published in 2018). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T22066A123792952. Available at https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-3.RLTS.T22066A45034047.en (accessed 10 September, 2024).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map of the known range of T. ornatus and location of Chingaza Natural National Park.Sources: IUCN, Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia, Natural Earth, Mapbox.

Figure 1

Figure 2. An Andean bear of unknown sex carries a captured wild guinea pig in its mouth.Photo credit: Sebastian Di Domenico.