Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:51:54.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vicissitudes of leaves in a tropical rain forest in Madagascar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2009

Harold Heatwole ,
Sybille Unsicker ,
Lala Roger Andriamiarisoa  and
Margaret D. Lowman
Harold Heatwole*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7617, USA
Sybille Unsicker
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans Knoell Str. 8, 07745 Jena, Germany
Lala Roger Andriamiarisoa
Affiliation:
Departement Biologia Végétal, Université d'Antananarivo, Antananarivo, Madagascar
Margaret D. Lowman
Affiliation:
Division of Natural Sciences, New College of Florida, 5800 Bay Shore Road, Sarasota FL 34243-2197, USA
*
1Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

A sample of 1834 leaves from 83 plants in 26 families was collected in tropical rain forest in Madagascar from three vertical strata: top of emergent trees (up to 37 m), top of trees in upper canopy (about 22 m), and shrubs and saplings at ground level. These leaves were examined for damage by seven different agents: fungi, epiphyllae, mechanical injury, galls, leaf miners, grazing insects and skeletonizing insects. Fungi affected more than 60% of the leaves and grazing insects 45–65%, with other agents each affecting 3–30%; fewer than 4% of the leaves escaped unscathed by any agent. Individual leaves were attacked by up to five agents. There was a sharp decline in proportion of leaves affected by fungi, leaf miners, epiphyllae and mechanical breakage with increasing category of severity. Grazing insects, mechanical injury, and perhaps galls, had greater impact at ground level than in the canopy, with fungi and skeletonizing insects showing the opposite pattern. Leaf miners had lower incidence in the canopy than elsewhere. The observed vertical stratification means that a tree not only needs to balance its defences to meet multiple threats in any stratum, but must adapt to a different suite of challenges during its lifetime. Attack by grazing insects and fungi are major challenges for saplings at ground level, but with increasing height above the ground fungal attack on leaves becomes more prevalent, but attack by grazing insects less so.

Keywords

epiphyllaefolivoryfungigallsherbivoryinsectsleaf minersskeletonizersvertical stratification
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 25 , Issue 6 , November 2009 , pp. 615 - 624
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

BARKER, M. G. 1996. Vertical profiles in a Brunei rain forest: I. Microclimate associated with a canopy tree. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 8:505–519.Google Scholar
BASSET, Y., ABERLENC, H.-P. & DELVARE, G. 1992. Abundance and stratification of foliage arthropods in a lowland rain forest of Cameroon. Ecological Entomology 17:310–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BASSET, Y., ABERLENC, H.-P., BARRIOS, H., CURLETTI, G., BÉRENGER, J.-M., VESCO, J.-P., CAUSSE, P., HAUG, A., HENNION, A.-S., LESOBRE, L., MARQUÉS, F. & O'MEARA, R. 2001. Stratification and diel activity of arthropods in a lowland rainforest in Gabon. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 72:585–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BENÍTEZ-MALVIDO, J. & LEMUS-ALBOR, A. 2005. The seedling community of tropical rain forest edges and its interaction with herbivores and pathogens. Biotropica 37:301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BENÍTEZ-MALVIDO, J., GARCÍA-GUZMÁN, G. & KOSSMANN-FERRAZ, I. D. 1999. Leaf-fungal incidence and herbivory on tree seedlings in tropical rainforest fragments: an experimental study. Biological Conservation 91:143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BLANC, P. 1990. Bioclimatologie comparée de la canopée et du sous-bois. Pp. 42–43 in Hallé, F. & Blanc, P. (eds.). Biologie d'une canopée de forêt équatoriale. Rapport de Mission Radeau des Cimes Octobre–Novembre 1989, Petit Saul – Guyane Française VI. Montpellier II and CNRS-Paris, Montpellier/Paris.Google Scholar
BONGERS, F. & POPMA, J. 1988. Is exposure-related variation in leaf characteristics of tropical rain forest species adaptive? Pp. 191–200 in Werger, M. J. A., van der Aart, P. J. M., During, H. J. & Verhoeven, J. T. A. (eds.). Plant form and vegetation structure. Adaptation, plasticity and relation to herbivory. Academic Publishing, The Hague.Google Scholar
BROSE, U., JONSSON, T., BERLOW, E. L., WARREN, P., BANASEK-RICHTER, C., BERSIER, L.-F., BLANCHARD, J. L., BREY, T., CARPENTER, S. R., BLANDENIER, M.-F. C., CUSHING, L., DAWAH, H. A., DELL, T., EDWARDS, F., HARPER-SMITH, S., JACOB, U., LEDGER, M. E., MARTINEZ, N. D., MEMMOTT, J., MINTENBECK, K., PINNEGAR, P. K., RALL, B. C., RAYNER, T. S., REUMAN, D. C., RUESS, L., ULRICH, W., WILLIAMS, R. J., WOODWARD, G. & COHEN, J. E. 2006. Consumer-resource body-size relationships in natural food webs. Ecology 87:2411–2417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
COLEY, P. D. 1983. Herbivory and defensive characteristics of tree species in a lowland tropical forest. Ecological Monographs 53:209–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COLEY, P. & KURSAR, T. 1996. Anti-herbivore defenses of young tropical leaves: physiological constraints and ecological trade-offs. Pp. 305–337 in Mulkey, S. S., Chazdon, R. L. & Smith, A. P. (eds.). Tropical forest plant ecophysiology. Chapman and Hall Publishers, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DE LA CRUZ, M. & DIRZO, R. 1987. A survey of the standing levels of herbivory in seedlings from a Mexican rain forest. Biotropica 19:98–106.Google Scholar
EBENMAN, B. 1992. Evolution in organisms that change their niches during the life cycle. The American Naturalist 139:990–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FITZJARRALD, D. R. & MOORE, K. E. 1995. Physical mechanisms of heat and mass exchange between forests and the atmosphere. Pp. 45–72 in Lowman, M. D. & Nadkarni, N. M. (eds.). Forest canopies. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
FONSECA, C. R., FLECK, T. & FERNANDES, G. W. 2006. Processes driving ontogenetic succession of galls in a canopy tree. Biotropica 38:514–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GARCÍA-GUZMÁN, G. & DIRZO, R. 2001. Patterns of leaf-pathogen infection in the understory of a Mexican rain forest: incidence, spatiotemporal variation, and mechanisms of infection. American Journal of Botany 88:634–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GARCÍA-GUZMÁN, G. & MORALES, E. 2007. Life-history strategies of plant pathogens: distribution patterns and phylogenetic analysis. Ecology 88:589–596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GARWOOD, N. 1983. Seed germination in a seasonal tropical forest in Panama: a community study. Ecological Monographs 53:159–181.Google Scholar
GILBERT, G. S., TALARO, N., HOWELL, C. A. & SYMSTAD, A. 1997. Multiple-scale spatial distribution of the fungal epiphyll Scolecopeltidium on Trichilia spp. in two lowland moist tropical forests. Canadian Journal of Botany 75:2158–2164.Google Scholar
GILBERT, G. S., REYNOLDS, D. R. & BETHANCOURT, A. 2007. The patchiness of epifoliar fungi in tropical forests: host range, host abundance, and environment. Ecology 88:575–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HALLÉ, F. 1998. Distribution verticale des metabolites secondaires en forêt équatoriale—une hypothése. Pp. 129–138 in Biologie d'une canopée de forêt equatoriale. III. Rapport de la mission d'exploration scientifique de la canopée de Guayane, Octobre–Décembre 1996. Pro-Natura International Opération Canopée, Paris.Google Scholar
HALLÉ, F. 2002. The canopy raft. Pp. 97–102 in Mitchell, A. W., Secoy, K. & Jackson, T. (eds.). The global canopy handbook, techniques of access and study in the forest roof. Global Canopy Programme, Oxford University, Oxford.Google Scholar
HALLÉ, F., CLEYET-MARREL, D. & EBERSOLT, G. 2000. Le Radeau des Cimes, exploration des canopées forestières. Editions Jean-Claude Lattès, Paris, France. 282 pp.Google Scholar
HEATWOLE, H. 1989. The concept of the econe, a fundamental ecological unit. Tropical Ecology 30:13–19.Google Scholar
KOIKE, F., RISWAN, S., PARTOMIHARDJO, T., SUZUKI, E. & HOTTA, H. 1998. Canopy structure and insect community distribution in a tropical rain forest of West Kalimantan. Selbyana 19:147–154.Google Scholar
KREMEN, C., RAZAFIMAHATRATRA, V., GUILLERY, R. P., RAKOTOMALALA, J., WEISS, A. & RATSISOMPATRARIVO, J.-S. 1999. Designing the Masoala National Park in Madagsascar based on biological and socioeconomic data. Conservation Biology 13:1055–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LOWMAN, M. D. 1985. Temporal and spatial variability in insect grazing of the canopies of five Australian rain forest tree species. Australian Journal of Ecology 10:7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LOWMAN, M. D. 1987. Relationships between leaf grow and holes caused by herbivores. Australian Journal of Ecology 12:189–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LOWMAN, M. D. & BOX, J. D. 1983. Variation in leaf toughness and phenolic content among 5 species of Australian rain forest trees. Australian Journal of Ecology 8:17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LOWMAN, M. D. & HEATWOLE, H. 1992. Spatial and temporal variability in defoliation of Australian eucalypts. Ecology 73:129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MARQUIS, R. J. & BRAKER, H. E. 1994. Plant–herbivore interactions: diversity, specificity, and impact. Pp. 261–281 in McDade, L. A., Bawa, K. S., Hespenheide, H. A. & Hartshorn, G. S. (eds.). La Selva, ecology and natural history of a neotropical rain forest. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
MITCHELL, A. W., SECOY, K. & JACKSON, T. 2002. Global canopy handbook, techniques of access and study in the forest roof. Global Canopy Programme, Oxford. 248 pp.Google Scholar
MONTE-ALEGRE, A., RAKOTOMALALA, Z., LEVEDGLE, M., COULIER, F. & FAURE, E. 2005. Ecological, vertical and elevational distributions of Heteropsis (Lepidoptera, Satyrinae) in the rainforest of Masoala (NE Madagascar). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 43:214–222.Google Scholar
MONTGOMERY, N. 1977. Single rope techniques, a guide for vertical cavers. Sydney Speleological Society Occasional Papers No. 7:1–122.Google Scholar
PARKER, G. G. 1995. Structure and microclimate of forest canopies. Pp. 73–106 in Lowman, M. D. & Nadkarni, N. M. (eds.). Forest canopies. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
RICHARDS, P. W. 1957. The tropical rain forest. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 450 pp.Google Scholar
STERCK, F., Van Der MEER, P. & BONGERS, F. 1992. Herbivory in two rain forest canopies in French Guiana. Biotropica 24:97–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SUTTON, S. L. 1989. The spatial distribution of flying insects. Pp. 427–436 in Lieth, H. & Werger, M. J. A. (eds.). Tropical rain forest ecosystems. Biogeograpical and ecological studies. Elsevier, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SUTTON, S. L. & HUDSON, P. J. 1980. The vertical distribution of small flying insects in the lowland rain forest Zaïre. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 68:111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WERNER, E. E. & GILLIAM, J. F. 1984. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15:393–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar