Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:21:28.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tree damage and microclimate of forest canopies along a hurricane-impact gradient in Cusuco National Park, Honduras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2014

Sven Peter Batke  and
Daniel Lucius Kelly
Sven Peter Batke*
Affiliation:
Department of Botany & Trinity Centre for Biodiversity Research, Trinity College, The University of Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
Daniel Lucius Kelly
Affiliation:
Department of Botany & Trinity Centre for Biodiversity Research, Trinity College, The University of Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
*
1Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Past studies of large, infrequent wind disturbances have shown that topographical, biological and meteorological factors interact to create complex damage patterns to forest ecosystems. However, the extent to which some of these factors change the forest microclimate along a vertical forest profile is poorly known. In a previous study, we correlated tree damage with a hurricane model that estimated past hurricane impacts within Cusuco National Park, Honduras over a 15-y period. Here we use the model to compare physical tree damage among different species in ten 150 ×150-m plots and to correlate modelled exposure of hurricanes to microclimate measurements along the vertical canopy over a 12-mo period. It was found that past hurricane impacts could still be detected long after the events. Different tree species showed different levels of wind damage. Most branch damage was observed on conifers (Pinus spp.), followed by angiosperm species. Vapour pressure deficit increased with height in the canopy and with increased disturbance level. A linear model explained 83% of the total variance in vapour pressure deficit, with 67% attributed to monthly fluctuation, 15% to altitude, 12% to historical hurricane damage and 6% to height in the canopy.

Keywords

climatedisturbancerain forestvapour pressure deficitwind
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 30 , Issue 5 , September 2014 , pp. 457 - 467
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ADELMAN, J. D., EWERS, B. E. & MACKAY, D. S. 2008. Use of temporal patterns in vapor pressure deficit to explain spatial autocorrelation dynamics in tree transpiration. Tree Physiology 28:647–658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BACON, M. A. 2004. Water use efficiency in plant biology. Blackwell Publishing, Boca Raton, FL. 344 pp.Google Scholar
BAKER, D. S. 1994. Evaluación ecológica rapida, Parque Nacional El Cusuco y Cordillera del Merendón, Honduras. The Nature Conservancy, Washington, DC. 79 pp.Google Scholar
BATKE, S. P., JOCQUE, M. & KELLY, D. L. 2014. Modelling hurricane exposure and wind speed on a mesoclimate scale: a case study from Cusuco NP, Honduras. PLOS ONE 9:e91306.Google Scholar
BELLINGHAM, P. J., KAPOS, V., HEALEY, J. R., TANNER, E. V. J., KELLY, D. L., DALLING, J. W., BURNS, L. S., LEE, D. & SIDRAK, G. 1992. Hurricanes need not cause high mortality: the effects of hurricane Gilbert on forests in Jamaica. Journal of Tropical Ecology 8:217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BENZING, D. H. 1990. Vascular epiphytes – general biology and related biota. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 376 pp.Google Scholar
BOHLMAN, S. A., MATELSON, T. J. & NADKARNI, N. M. 1995. Moisture and temperature patterns of canopy humus and forest floor soil of a montane cloud forest, Costa Rica. Biotropica 27:13–19.Google Scholar
BOLTON, D. 1980. The computation of equivalent potential temperature. Monthly Weather Review 108:1046–1053.Google Scholar
BOOSE, E. R., CHAMBERLIN, K. E. & FOSTER, D. R. 2001. Landscape and regional impacts of hurricanes in New England. Ecological Monographs 71:27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BOUCHER, D. H., VANDERMEER, J. H., YIH, K. & NELSON, Z. 1990. Contrasting hurricane damage in tropical rain forest and pine forest. Ecology 71:2022–2024.Google Scholar
BROKAW, N. V. L. & GREAR, J. S. 1991. Forest structure before and after hurricane Hugo at three elevations in the Luquillo Mountains, Puerto Rico. Biotropica 23:386–392.Google Scholar
BROKAW, N. V. L. & WALKER, L. R. 1991. Summary of the effects of Caribbean hurricanes on vegetation. Biotropica 23:442–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CACH-PÉREZ, M. J., ANDRADE, J. L., CHILPA-GALVÁN, N., TAMAYO-CHIM, M., ORELLANA, R. & REYES-GARCÍA, C. 2013. Climatic and structural factors influencing epiphytic bromeliad community assemblage along a gradient of water-limited environments in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Tropical Conservation Science 6:283–302.Google Scholar
CAYUELA, L., GÁLVEZ-BRAVO, L., PÉREZ, R. P., DE ALBUQUERQUE, F. S., GOLICHER, D. J., ZAHAWI, R. A., RAMÍREZ-MARCIAL, N., GARIBALDI, C., FIELD, R., BENAYAS, J. M. R., GONZÁLEZ-ESPINOSA, M., BALVANERA, P., CASTILLO, M. Á., FIGUEROA-RANGEL, B. L., GRIFFITH, D. M., ISLEBE, G. A., KELLY, D. L., OLVERA-VARGAS, M., SCHNITZER, S. A., VELÁZQUEZ, E., WILLIAMS-LINERA, G., BREWER, S. W., CAMACHO-CRUZ, A., CORONADO, I., DE JONG, B., DEL CASTILLO, R., GRANZOW-DE LA CERDA, Í., FERNÁNDEZ, J., FONSECA, W., GALINDO-JAIMES, L., GILLESPIE, T. W., GONZÁLEZ-RIVAS, B., GORDON, J. E., HURTADO, J., LINARES, J., LETCHER, S. G., MANGAN, S. A., MEAVE, J. A., MÉNDEZ, E. V., MEZA, V., OCHOA-GAONA, S., PETERSON, C. J., RUIZ-GUTIERREZ, V., SNARR, K. A., DZUL, F. T., VALDEZ-HERNÁNDEZ, M., VIERGEVER, K. M., WHITE, D. A., WILLIAMS, J. N., BONET, F. J. & ZAMORA, R. 2012. The Tree Biodiversity Network (BIOTREE-NET): prospects for biodiversity research and conservation in the Neotropics. Biodiversity and Ecology 4:211–224.Google Scholar
DAVIES-COLLEY, R. J., PAYNE, G. W. & VAN ELSWIJK, M. 2000. Microclimate gradients across a forest edge. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 24:111–121.Google Scholar
DE FRENNE, P., RODRÍGUEZ-SÁNCHEZ, F., COOMES, D. A., BAETEN, L., VERSTRAETEN, G., VELLEND, M., BERNHARDT-RÖMERMANN, M., BROWN, C. D., BRUNET, J., CORNELIS, J., DECOCQ, G. M., DIERSCHKE, H., ERIKSSON, O., GILLIAM, F. S., HÉDL, R., HEINKEN, T., HERMY, M., HOMMEL, P., JENKINS, M. A., KELLY, D. L., KIRBY, K. J., MITCHELL, F. J. G., NAAF, T., NEWMAN, M., PETERKEN, G., PETŘÍK, P., SCHULTZ, J., SONNIER, G., VAN CALSTER, H., WALLER, D. M., WALTHER, G.-R., WHITE, P. S., WOODS, K. D., WULF, M., GRAAE, B. J. & VERHEYEN, K. 2013. Microclimate moderates plant responses to macroclimate warming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 110:18561–18565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DE GOUVENAIN, R. C. & SILANDER, J. A. 2003. Do tropical storm regimes influence the structure of tropical lowland rain forests? Biotropica 35:166–180.Google Scholar
DONALD, B. A. 1936. Relative humidity or vapor pressure deficit. Ecology 17:277–282.Google Scholar
ENSOR, M. O. 2009. The legacy of hurricane Mitch: lessons from post-disaster reconstruction in Honduras. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. 240 pp.Google Scholar
EVERHAM, E. M. & BROKAW, N. V. L. 1996. Forest damage and recovery from catastrophic wind. Botanical Review 62:113–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FETCHER, N., OBERBAUER, S. F. & STRAIN, B. R. 1985. Vegetation effects on microclimate in lowland tropical forest in Costa Rica. International Journal of Biometeorology 29:145–155.Google Scholar
FOSTER, D. R. & BOOSE, E. R. 1992. Patterns of forest damage resulting from catastrophic wind in central New England, USA. Journal of Ecology 80:79–98.Google Scholar
HARBORNE, A. R., AFZAL, D. C. & ANDREWS, M. J. 2001. Honduras: Caribbean coast. Marine Pollution Bulletin 42:1221–1235.Google Scholar
HEIKKINEN, R. K., LUOTO, M., ARAÚJO, M. B., VIRKKALA, R., THUILLER, W. & SYKES, M. T. 2006. Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change. Progress in Physical Geography 30:751–777.Google Scholar
KING, D. A. 1986. Tree form, height growth, and susceptibility to wind damage in Acer saccharum. Ecology 67:980–990.Google Scholar
KOCH, G. W., SILLETT, S. C., JENNINGS, G. M. & DAVIS, S. D. 2004. The limits to tree height. Nature 428:851–854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LEWIS, R. J. & BANNAR-MARTIN, K. H. 2011. The impact of cyclone Fanele on a tropical dry forest in Madagascar. Biotropica 44:1–6.Google Scholar
LUGO, A. E., ROGERS, C. S. & NIXON, S. W. 2000. Hurricanes, coral reefs and rainforests: resistance, ruin and recovery in the Caribbean. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 29:106–114.Google Scholar
MARTIN, T. J. & OGDEN, J. 2006. Wind damage and response in New Zealand forests: a review. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 30:295–310.Google Scholar
MCCALLUM, D. J., MASON, E. G. & WHITLEY, B. 2007. Influence of exposure and elevation on radiata pine branch size, log velocity, sweep, taper and value. New Zealand Journal of Forestry 52:10–16.Google Scholar
MEYER, C. L., SISK, T. D. & COVINGTON, W. W. 2001. Microclimatic changes induced by ecological restoration of ponderosa pine forests in northern Arizona. Restoration Ecology 9:443–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MURRAY, F. W. 1967. On the computation of saturation vapor pressure. Journal of Applied Meteorology 6:203–204.Google Scholar
O’BRIEN, R. 2007. A caution regrading rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality and Quantity 41:673–690.Google Scholar
PIELKE, R. A., RUBIERA, J., LANDSEA, C., FERNANDEZ, M. L. & KLEIN, R. 2003. Hurricane vulnerability in Latin America and the Caribbean: normalized damage and loss potentials. Natural Hazards Review 4:101–114.Google Scholar
PUTZ, F. E., COLEY, P. D., LU, K., MONTALVO, A. & AIELLO, A. 1983. Uprooting and snapping of trees: structural determinants and ecological consequences. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 13:1011–1020.Google Scholar
RAMBO, T. R. & NORTH, M. P. 2009. Canopy microclimate response to pattern and density of thinning in a Sierra Nevada forest. Forest Ecology and Management 257:435–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RICHARDS, P. W. 1996. The tropical rain forest. (Second edition). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 575 pp.Google Scholar
SALDAÑA, A., PARRA, M. J., FLORES-BAVESTRELLO, A., CORCUERA, L. J. & BRAVO, L. A. 2013. Effects of forest successional status on microenvironmental conditions, diversity, and distribution of filmy fern species in a temperate rainforest. Plant Species Biology doi: 10.1111/1442–1984.12020.Google Scholar
SHAW, D. C. 2004. Vertical organisation of canopy biota. Pp. 73–78 in Lowman, M. D. & Rinker, H. B. (eds.). Forest canopies. Elsevier Academic Press, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STRECK, N. A. 2003. Stomatal responses to water vapor pressure deficit: an unsolved issue. Current Agricultural Science and Technology 9:317–322.Google Scholar
STUNTZ, S., SIMON, U. & ZOTZ, G. 2002. Rainforest air-conditioning: the moderating influence of epiphytes on the microclimate in tropical tree crowns. International Journal of Biometeorology 46:53–59.Google Scholar
STURTEVANT, B. R., MIRANDA, B. R., WOLTER, P. T., JAMES, P. M. A., FORTIN, M. J. & TOWNSEND, P. A. 2014. Forest recovery patterns in response to divergent disturbance regimes in the Border Lakes region of Minnesota (USA) and Ontario (Canada). Forest Ecology and Management 313:199–211.Google Scholar
SZARZYNKI, J. & ANHUF, D. 2001. Micrometeorological conditions and canopy energy exchanges of a neotropical rain forest (Surumoni-Crane project, Venezuela). Plant Ecology 153:231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TURNER, M. G., BAKER, W. L., PETERSON, C. J. & PEET, R. K. 1998. Factors influencing succession: lessons from large, infrequent natural disturbances. Ecosystems 6:511–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TURTON, S. 2013. Tropical cyclones and forest dynamics under a changing climate: what are the long-term implications for tropical forest canopies in the cyclone belt? Pp. 105–111 in Lowman, M., Devy, S. & Ganesh, T. (eds.). Treetops at risk. Springer, New York, NY.Google Scholar
TURTON, S. M. & SIEGENTHALER, D. T. 2004. Immediate impacts of a severe tropical cyclone on the microclimate of a rain-forest canopy in north-east Australia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 20:583–586.Google Scholar
URIARTE, M., RIVERA, L. W., ZIMMERMAN, J. K., AIDE, T. M., POWER, A. G. & FLECKER, A. S. 2004. Effects of land use history on hurricane damage and recovery in a neotropical forest. Plant Ecology 174:49–58.Google Scholar
WEAVER, P. L. 2008. Dwarf forest recovery after disturbances in the Luquillo Mountains of Puerto Rico. Caribbean Journal of Science 44:150–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WEISHAMPEL, J. F., DRAKE, J. B., COOPER, A., BLAIR, J. B. & HOFTON, M. 2007. Forest canopy recovery from the 1938 hurricane and subsequent salvage damage measured with airborne LiDAR. Remote Sensing of Environment 109:142–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
XI, W., PEET, R. K., DECOSTER, J. K. & URBAN, D. L. 2008. Tree damage risk factors associated with large, infrequent wind disturbances of Carolina forests. Forestry 81:318–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ZIMMERMAN, J. K., EVERHAM, E. M., WAIDE, R. B., LODGE, D. J., TAYLOR, C. M. & BROKAW, N. V. L. 1994. Responses of tree species to hurricane winds in subtropical wet forest in Puerto Rico: implications for tropical tree life histories. Journal of Ecology 82:911–922.Google Scholar