Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:02:19.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial patterns of primary seed dispersal and adult tree distributions: Genipa americana dispersed by Cebus capucinus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2015

Kim Valenta ,
Mariah E. Hopkins ,
Melanie Meeking ,
Colin A. Chapman  and
Linda M. Fedigan
Kim Valenta*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Department of Anthropology, 19 Russell Street, Toronto, ON, M5Y 2S2, Canada
Mariah E. Hopkins
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin, Department of Anthropology, 1 University Station, C3200, Austin, TX 78712, USA
Melanie Meeking
Affiliation:
University of Calgary, Department of Anthropology, 2500 University Dr. N.W. Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada
Colin A. Chapman
Affiliation:
McGill University, Anthropology and School of the Environment, Montreal, QC, H3A 2T7, Canada Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, New York, USA
Linda M. Fedigan
Affiliation:
University of Calgary, Department of Anthropology, 2500 University Dr. N.W. Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada
*
1 Corresponding author. Current address: McGill University, Anthropology Montreal, H3A 2T7, Canada. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The spatial distribution of adult trees is typically not expected to reflect the spatial patterns of primary seed dispersal, due to many factors influencing post-dispersal modification of the seed shadow, such as seed predation, secondary seed dispersal and density-dependent survival. Here, we test the hypothesis that spatial distributions of primary seed shadows and adult trees are concordant by analysing the spatial distributions of adult Genipa americana trees and the seed shadow produced by its key primary disperser, the capuchin monkey (Cebus capucinus) in a tropical dry forest in Costa Rica. We mapped the dispersal of G. americana seeds by the capuchins during focal animal follows (mean = 463 min, n = 50) of all adults in one free-ranging group over two early wet seasons (May–July, 2005 and 2006). We mapped the locations of all G. americana trees within a 60-ha plot that lay within the home range of the capuchin group. We conducted multiple spatial point pattern analyses comparing degrees of clustering of capuchin defecations and G. americana trees. We found that adult tree distributions and primary dispersal patterns are similarly aggregated at multiple spatial scales, despite the modification of the primary dispersal patterns and long dispersal distances.

Keywords

aggregationclumped distributionCosta Ricapost dispersal mortalitysecondary dispersalseed dispersal
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 31 , Issue 6 , November 2015 , pp. 491 - 498
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

AUGSPURGER, C. K. 1983. Offspring recruitment around tropical trees: changes in cohort distance with time. Oikos 40:189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BALCOMB, S. R. & CHAPMAN, C. A. 2003. Bridging the gap: influence of seed deposition on seedling recruitment in a primate-tree interaction. Ecological Monographs 73:625–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BESAG, J. 1977. Contribution to the discussion of Dr. Ripley's paper. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 39:193–195.Google Scholar
CHAPMAN, C. A. 1989. Primate seed dispersal: the fate of dispersed seeds. Biotropica 21:148–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CLARK, D. A. & CLARK, D. B. 1984. Spacing dynamics of a tropical rain forest tree: evaluation of the Janzen–Connell model. American Naturalist 124:769–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CLARK, D. B., PALMER, M. W. & CLARK, D. A. 1999. Edaphic factors and the landscape-scale distributions of tropical rain forest trees. Ecology 80:2662–2675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CONDIT, R., ASHTON, P. S., BAKER, P., BUNYAVEJCHEWIN, S., GUNATILLEKE, S., GUNATILLEKE, N., HUBBELL, S. P., FOSTER, R. B., ITOH, A., LAFRANKIE, J. V., LEE, H. S., LOSOS, E., MANOKARAN, N., SUKUMAR, R. & YAKAMURA, T. 2000. Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species. Science 288:1414–1418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CONDIT, R., ASHTON, P., BUNYAVEJCHEWIN, S., DATTARAJA, H. S., DAVIES, S., ESUFALI, S., EWANGO, C., FOSTER, R., GUNATILLEKE, I., GUNATILLEKE, C. V. S., HALL, P., HARMS, K. E., HART, T., HERNANDEZ, C., HUBBELL, S., ITOH, A., KIRATIPRAYOON, S., LAFRANKIE, J., LAO, S. L. D., MAKANA, J., NOOR, M. N. S., KASSIM, A. R., RUSSO, S., SUKUMAR, R., SAMPER, C., SURESH, H. S., TAN, S., THOMAS, S., VALENCIA, R., VALLEJO, M., VILLA, G. & ZILLIO, T. 2006. The importance of demographic niches to tree diversity. Science 313:98–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CONNELL, J. H. 1971. On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in rain forest trees. Pp. 298–312 in Boer, Den, P. & Gradwell, G. (eds.). Dynamics of populations. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen.Google Scholar
CORLETT, R. T. 2011. How to be a frugivore (in a changing world). Acta Oecologica 37:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DEW, J. L. & WRIGHT, P. 1998. Frugivory and seed dispersal by four species of primates in Madagascar's eastern rain forest. Biotropica 30:425–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FEDIGAN, L. M., FEDIGAN, L. & CHAPMAN, C. A. 1985. Census of Alouatta palliata and Cebus capucinus in Santa Rosa National Park, Costa Rica. Brenesia 23:309–322.Google Scholar
FORGET, P. M. & MILLERON, T. 1991. Evidence for secondary seed dispersal by rodents in Panama. Oecologia 87:596–599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GETZIN, S., WIEGAND, T. & HUBBELL, S.P. 2014. Stochastically driven adult-recruit associations of tree species on Barro Colorado Island. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B 281:20140922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HARMS, K., WRIGHT, S., CALDERÓN, O., HERNÁNDEZ, A. & HERRE, E. 2000. Pervasive density-dependent recruitment enhances seedling diversity in a tropical forest. Nature 404:493–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOWE, H. F. & SMALLWOOD, J. 1982. Ecology of seed dispersal. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13:201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUBBELL, S. P. 1979. Tree dispersion, abundance, and diversity in a tropical dry forest. Science 203:1299–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HYATT, L. A., ROSENBERG, M. S., HOWARD, T. G., BOLE, G., FANG, W., ANASTASIA, J., BROWN, K., GRELLA, R., HINMAN, K. & KURDZIEL, J. P. 2003. The distance dependence prediction of the Janzen–Connell hypothesis: a meta-analysis. Oikos 103:590–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JANZEN, D. H. 1970. Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. American Naturalist 104:501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JANZEN, D. H. & MARTIN, P. S. 1982. Neotropical anachronisms: the fruits the gomphotheres ate. Science 215:19–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
JULLIOT, C. 1997. Impact of seed dispersal by red howler monkeys Alouatta seniculus on the seedling population in the understorey of tropical rain forest. Journal of Ecology 85:431–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEVINE, J. M. & MURRELL, D. J. 2003. The community-level consequences of seed dispersal patterns. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 34:549–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LOISELLE, B. A., BLENDINGER, P. G., BLAKE, J. G. & RYDER, T. B. 2007. Ecological redundancy in seed dispersal systems: a comparison between manakins (Aves: Pipridae) in two tropical forests. Pp. 178–195 in Dennis, A. J., Schupp, E. W., Green, R. & Westcott, D. W. (eds.). Seed dispersal: theory and its application in a changing world. CABI Publishing, Wallingford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LOOSEMORE, N. B. & FORD, E. D. 2006. Statistical inference using the G or K point pattern spatial statistics. Ecology 87:1925–1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MIELKE, P. & BERRY, K. 2001. Permutation methods: a distance function approach. Springer Verlag, New York. 353 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MULLER-LANDAU, H. C., WRIGHT, S. J., CALDERON, O., CONDIT, R. & HUBBELL, S. P. 2008. Interspecific variation in primary seed dispersal in a tropical forest. Journal of Ecology 96:653–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MURRAY, K. G., RUSSELL, S., PICONE, C. M., WINNETT-MURRAY, K., SHERWOOD, W. & KUHLMANN, M. L. 1994. Fruit laxatives and seed passage rates in frugivores: consequences for plant reproductive success. Ecology 75:989–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NATHAN, R. & CASAGRANDI, R. 2004. A simple mechanistic model of seed dispersal, predation and plant establishment: Janzen–Connell and beyond. Journal of Ecology 92:733–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NOGALES, M., NIEVES, C., ILLERA, J. C. & TRAVESET, A. 2007. Secondary seed dispersal systems, frugivorous lizards and predatory birds in insular volcanic badlands. Journal of Ecology 95:1394–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RUSSO, S. E. & AUGSPURGER, C. K. 2004. Aggregated seed dispersal by spider monkeys limits recruitment to clumped patterns in Virola calophylla . Ecology Letters 7:1058–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHUPP, E. 1993. Quantity, quality and the effectiveness of seed dispersal by animals. Plant Ecology 107:15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SEIDLER, T. G. & PLOTKIN, J. B. 2006. Seed dispersal and spatial pattern in tropical trees. PLoS Biology 4:2132–2137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SORENSEN, T. & FEDIGAN, L. M. 2000. Distribution of three monkey species along a gradient of regenerating tropical dry forest. Biological Conservation 92:227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TRAVESET, A., RIERA, N. & MAS, R. E. 2001. Passage through bird guts causes interspecific differences in seed germination characteristics. Functional Ecology 15:669–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VALENTA, K. & FEDIGAN, L. M. 2009. Effects of gut passage, feces, and seed handling on latency and rate of germination in seeds consumed by capuchins (Cebus capucinus). American Journal of Physical Anthropology 13:486–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VALENTA, K. & FEDIGAN, L. M. 2010. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal by white-faced capuchins in Costa Rica: evaluating distant-dependent seed mortality. Biotropica 42:223–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VANDER WALL, S. B. & BECK, M. J. 2012. A comparison of frugivory and scatter-hoarding seed-dispersal syndromes. Botanical Review 78:10–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WIEGAND, T. & MOLONEY, K. A. 2004. Rings, circles, and null models for point pattern analysis in ecology. Oikos 104:209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WIEGAND, T. & MOLONEY, K. A. 2014. A handbook of spatial point pattern analysis in ecology. Boca Raton, Chapman and Hall/CRC Press. 538 pp.Google Scholar
WIEGAND, T., HUTH, A. & MARTINEZ, I. 2009. Recruitment in tropical tree species: revealing complex spatial patterns. American Naturalist 174:E106–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WIEGAND, T., HE, F. & HUBBELL, S. P. 2013. A systematic comparison of summary characteristics for quantifying point patterns in ecology. Ecography 36:92–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar