Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:30:30.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pollination biology and breeding systems of six Vochysia species (Vochysiaceae) in Central Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Paulo Oliveira  and
Peter Gibbs
Paulo Oliveira
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biociencias, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Cxp 593, Uberlândia-MG, Brazil
Peter Gibbs
Affiliation:
Plant Science Laboratories, Sir Harold Mitchell Building, The University, St Andrews, KY16 9AL, Scotland, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Six Vochysia species occurring in cerrado vegetation or gallery forest in central Brazil were studied for their pollination biology and breeding system. The species showed rather different flowering phenologies, but presented a relatively uniform floral morphology and attracted a mostly similar spectrum of visitors. Principal pollinators were large Anthophoridae bees, but three species were also visited by sphingid moths while hummingbirds were opportunistic visitors to all species. Some observations indicated that the slight differences in flower size or habitat between species may have influenced the relative importance of bees versus hummingbirds or sphingids as effective pollinators. All six species were found to be self-incompatible with self-pollen tube rejection, usually accompanied by callose deposition, occurring in the mid-style.

Keywords

pollinationVochysia spp.Brazil
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , November 1994 , pp. 509 - 522
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Barbosa, A. A. 1983. Aspectos da ecologia reprodutiva de três espécies de Qualea (Vochysiaceae) de um cerrado de Brasília, D. F. MSc. thesis, Universidade de Brasília.Google Scholar
Bawa, K. S. 1974. Breeding systems of tree species of a lowland tropical community. Evolution 28:85–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bawa, K. S. & Beach, J. H. 1983. Self-incompatibility systems in the Rubiaceae of a tropical lowland wet forest. American Journal of Botany 70:1281–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawa, K. S., Perry, D. R. & Beach, J. H. 1985. Reproductive biology of tropical lowland rain forest trees. I. Sexual systems and incompatibility mechanisms. American Journal of Botany 72:331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, S. H. 1985. Breeding systems in the flora of a tropical deciduous forest. Biotropka 17:287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cope, F. W. 1962. The mechanism of incompatibility in Theobroma cacao L. Heredity 17:157–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronquist, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Eiten, G. 1972. Cerrado vegetation of Brazil. Botanical Review (Lancaster) 38:201–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eiten, G. 1984. Vegetation of Brasilia. Phytocoenologia 12:271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faegri, K. & van der Pijl, L. 1979. The principles of pollination ecology. Pergamon Press, New York.Google Scholar
Feinsinger, P. 1987. Effects of plant species on each other's pollination: is community structure influenced? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2:123–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frankie, G. W., Haber, W. A., Opler, P. A. & Bawa, K. S. 1983. Characteristics and organization of the large bee pollination systems in the Costa Rican dry forest. Pp. 411–447 in Jones, C. E. & Little, R. J. (eds). Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York.Google Scholar
Gibbs, P. E. 1986. Do homomorphic and heteromorphic self-incompatibilities have the same sporophytic mechanisms? Plant Systematics and Evolution 154:285–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, P. E. 1990. Self-incompatibility in flowering plants: a neotropical perspective. Rivista Brasileira de Botânica 13:125–136.Google Scholar
Gibbs, P. E. & Bianchi, M. 1993. Post-pollination events in species of Chorisia (Bombacaceae) and Tabebuia (Bignoniaceae) with late-acting self-incompatibility. Botanica Ada 105:64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodland, R. & Ferri, M. 1979. Ecologia do Cerrado. University of São Paulo. Sao Paulo.Google Scholar
Gottsberger, G. 1986. Some pollination strategies in neotropical savannas and forests. Plant Systematics and Evolution 152:29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, F. N. 1959. Staining and observing pollen tubes in the style by means of fluorescence. Stain Technology 34:125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Negret, A. J., Soares, R. C., Cavalcanti, R. B. & Johnson, C. 1984. Aves da Região Geopotitica do Distrito Federal. Secretaria Especial do Meio Ambiente – SEMA. Brasilia.Google Scholar
Nettancourt, D. de. 1977. Incompatibility in Angiosperms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, P. E. 1991. The pollination and reproductive biology of a cerrado woody community in Brazil. PhD thesis, University of St Andrews (Scotland).Google Scholar
Oliveira, P. E., Gibbs, P. E. & Bianchi, M. 1991. Pollination and breeding biology of Vellozia squamata (Liliales-Velloziaceae): a species of the Brazilian cerrados. Botanica Acta 104:392–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, P. E., Gibbs, P. E., Barbosa, A. A. & Talavera, S. 1992. Contrasting breeding systems in two Eriotheca (Bombacaceae) species of the Brazilian cerrados. Plant Systematics and Evolution 179:207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathke, B. 1983. Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination. Pp. 305–329 in Real, L. (ed.). Pollination biology. Academic Press, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathcke, B. & Lacey, E. P. 1985. Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16:179–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratter, J. A. 1985. Notas sobre a vegetação da Fazenda Agua Limpa. Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Richards, A. J. 1986. Plant breeding systems. Allen & Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Rizzini, C. T. & Heringer, E. P. 1966. Estudo sobre os sistemas subterrâneos difusos de plantas campestres. Anales da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, Suppl., 85–112.Google Scholar
Sarmiento, G. 1983. The savannas of tropical America. Pp. 245–288 in Boulière, F. (ed.). Ecosystems of the World: tropical savannas. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Sarmiento, G. & Monasterio, M. 1983. Life forms and phenology. Pp. 79–108 in Bouliere, F. (ed.). Ecosystems of the World: tropical savannas. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Seavey, S. R. & Bawa, K. S. 1986. Late-acting self-incompatibility in Angiosperms. Botanical Review (Lancaster) 52:195–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silberbauer-Gottsberger, I. & Gottsberger, G. 1975. Uber sphingophile Angiospermen Brasiliens. Plant Systematics and Evolution 123:157–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stafleu, F. A. 1948. A monograph of the Vochysiaceae. I. Salvertia and Vochysia. Medtdelingen van het Botanisch Museum en Herbarium van de Rijksuniversiteit te Utrecht. 95:397–540.Google Scholar
Stiles, F. G. 1975. Ecology, flowering phenology, and hummingbird pollination of some Costa Rican Heliconia species. Ecology 56:285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waser, N. 1978. Competition for hummingbird pollination and sequential flowering in two Colorado wildflowers. Ecology 59:934–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waser, N. 1983. Competition for pollination and floral character differences among sympatric plant species: a review of evidence. Pp. 277–293 in Little, C. E. & Jones, R. J. (eds). Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. Inc., New York.Google Scholar