Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:45:28.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phosphorus fractionation in grasses with different resource-acquisition characteristics in natural grasslands of South America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2019

Anderson Cesar Ramos Marques Open the ORCID record for Anderson Cesar Ramos Marques [Opens in a new window] ,
Rogério Piccin ,
Tales Tiecher ,
Leandro Bittencourt de Oliveira ,
João Kaminski ,
Roque Junior Sartori Bellinaso ,
Amanda Veridiana Krug ,
Luciano Colpo Gatiboni ,
Fernando Luiz Ferreira de Quadros  and
Corina Carranca
...Show all authors
Anderson Cesar Ramos Marques*
Affiliation:
Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Rogério Piccin
Affiliation:
Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Tales Tiecher
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Leandro Bittencourt de Oliveira
Affiliation:
Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
João Kaminski
Affiliation:
Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Roque Junior Sartori Bellinaso
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Amanda Veridiana Krug
Affiliation:
Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Luciano Colpo Gatiboni
Affiliation:
State University of Santa Catarina (UDESC), Center of Animal and Rural Science (CAV), Lages, Santa Catarina, Brazil
Fernando Luiz Ferreira de Quadros
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Corina Carranca
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, Oeiras, Portugal
Gustavo Brunetto
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
*
*Author for correspondence: Anderson Cesar Ramos Marques, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The natural grasslands in South America have soils with low phosphorus (P) availability (1.0 to 7.5 mg kg−1), possibly altering the absorption and accumulation of P in grasses. We evaluated the chemical fractionation of P in the leaves of the most important grasses present in these grasslands to better understand the mechanisms involved in the storage of P. The grasses studied were Axonopus affinis and Paspalum notatum (fast tissue cycling and high nutrient demand) and Andropogon lateralis and Aristida laevis (slow tissue cycling and low nutrient demand). They were grown in pots filled with an Ultisol with two levels of P: control, and addition of 50 mg P kg–1. The main P fractions were the inorganic soluble (44%) and P in RNA (26%). Addition of P increased the total P concentration, following the order A. affinis (140%) > P. notatum (116%) > A. lateralis (81%) > A. laevis (21%). In conclusion, the species A. affinis and P. notatum responded to P fertilization with high variation and accumulating P in less-structural chemical forms, such as inorganic P. The species A. lateralis and A. laevis showed low variation in the concentration of P forms, with higher P concentrations in structural forms.

Keywords

Growth strategiesleaf traitsnatural grasslandphosphorus allocationphosphorus nutrition
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , September 2019 , pp. 203 - 212
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature cited

Bieleski, RL (1973) Phosphate pools, phosphate transport, and phosphate availability. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 24, 225–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bieleski, RL and Ferguson, JB (1983) Physiology and metabolism of phosphate and its compounds. In Lauchli, A and Bieleski, RL (eds), Inorganic Plant Nutrition. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. Berlin: Springer, pp. 422–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casali, CA, Kaminski, J, Piccin, R, Arbugeri, FE and Doneda, A (2011) Mineralização das formas de fósforo do tecido de plantas de cobertura. Informações Agronomicas – INPI 135, 21–24.Google Scholar
CQFS-RS/SC (2016) Manual de calagem e adubação para os estados do Rio Grande do Sul e Santa Catarina. In Tedesco, MJ, Gianello, C, Anghinoni, I, Bissani, CA, Camargo, FAO and Wiethölter, S (eds), Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo. Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Porto Alegre, 400 pp.Google Scholar
Cruz, P, De Quadros, FLF, Theau, JP, Frizzo, A, Jouany, C, Duru, M and Carvalho, PCF (2010) Leaf traits as functional descriptors of the intensity of continuous grazing in native grasslands in the south of Brazil. Rangeland Ecology and Management 63, 350–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatiboni, LC, Kaminski, J, Pellegrini, JBR, Brunetto, G, Saggin, A and Flores, JPC (2000) Influência da adubação fosfatada e da introdução de espécies forrageiras de inverno na oferta de forragem de pastagem natural. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 35, 1663–1668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimoldi, AA, Kavanová, M, Lattanzi, FA and Schnyder, H (2005) Phosphorus nutrition mediated effects of arbuscular mycorrhiza on leaf morphology and carbon allocation in perennial ryegrass. New Phytologist 168, 435–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hidaka, A and Kitayama, K (2011) Allocation of foliar phosphorus fractions and leaf traits of tropical tree species in response to decreased soil phosphorus availability on Mount Kinabalu, Borneo. Journal of Ecology 99, 849–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogue, E, Wilcox, GE and Cantliffe, DJ (1987) Effect of soil phosphorus levels on phosphate fractions in tomato leaves. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 95, 174–176.Google Scholar
Holford, ICR (1997) Soil phosphorus: its measurement, and its uptake by plants. Australian Journal of Soil Research 35, 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambers, H, Shane, MW, Cramer, MD, Pearse, SJ and Veneklaas, EJ (2006) Root structure and functioning for efficient acquisition of phosphorus: matching morphological and physiological traits. Annals of Botany 98, 693–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambers, H, Finnegan, PM, Laliberte, E, Pearse, SJ, Ryan, MH, Shane, MW and Veneklaas, EJ (2011) Phosphorus nutrition of Proteaceae in severely phosphorus-impoverished soils: are there lessons to be learned for future crops? Plant Physiology 156, 1058–1066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambers, H, Cawthray, GR, Giavalisco, P, Kuo, J, Laliberté, E, Pearse, SJ, Scheible, WR, Stitt, M, Teste, F and Turner, BL (2012) Proteaceae from severely phosphorus-impoverished soils extensively replace phospholipids with galactolipids and sulfolipids during leaf development to achieve a high photosynthetic phosphorus-use-efficiency. New Phytologist 196, 1098–1108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machado, JM, Rocha, MG, Quadros, FLF, Confortin, ACC, Dos Santos, AB, Sichonany, MJ De O, Ribeiro, LA and Da Rosa, ATN (2013) Morphogenesis of native grasses of Pampa biome under nitrogen fertilization. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 42, 22–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyachi, S and Tamiya, H (1961) Distribution and turnover of phosphate compounds in growing Chlorella cells. Plant and Cell Physiology 2, 405–414.Google Scholar
Murphy, J and Riley, JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 27, 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noack, SR, McLaughlin, MJ, Smernik, RJ, McBeath, TM and Armstrong, RD (2014a) Phosphorus speciation in mature wheat and canola plants as affected by phosphorus supply. Plant and Soil 378, 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noack, SR, Smernik, RJ, McBeath, TM, Armstrong, RD and McLaughlin, MJ (2014b) Assessing crop residue phosphorus speciation using chemical fractionation and solution 31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Talanta 126, 122–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliveira, LB, Tiecher, T, Quadros, FLF, Trindade, JPP, Gatiboni, LC, Brunetto, G and Santos, DR (2014) Formas de fósforo no solo sob pastagens naturais submetidas à adição de fosfatos. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 38, 867–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, LB, Marques, ACR, De Quadros, FLF, Farias, JG, Piccin, R, Brunetto, G and Nicoloso, FT (2018) Phosphorus allocation and phosphatase activity in grasses with different growth rates. Oecologia 186, 633–643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pallarés, OR, Berretta, EJ and Maraschin, GE (2005) The South American Campos ecosystem. In Suttie, JM, Reynolds, SG and Batello, C (eds), Grasslands of the World. Rome: FAO, pp. 171–219.Google Scholar
Pereira, JM, Cambraia, J, Da Fonseca Júnior, ÉM and Ribeiro, C (2008) Efeito do alumínio sobre a absorção, o acúmulo e o fracionamento do fósforo em sorgo. Bragantia 67, 961–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rheinheimer, DS, Martinazzo, R, Gatiboni, LC, Kaminski, J and Da Silva, LS (2008) Amplitude no fósforo microbiano em um argissolo em pastagem nativa submetida a roçada e introdução de espécies forrageiras com fertilização fosfatada em diferentes épocas. Acta Scientiarum – Agronomy 30, 561–567.Google Scholar
Tiecher, T, Oliveira, LB, Rheinheimer, DS, Quadros, FLF, Gatiboni, LC, Brunetto, G and Kaminski, J (2014) Phosphorus application and liming effects on forage production, floristic composition and soil chemical properties in the Campos biome, southern Brazil. Grass and Forage Science 69, 567–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USEPA (1971) Methods of Chemical Analysis for Water and Wastes. Cincinnati, OH: United States Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Veneklaas, EJ, Lambers, H, Bragg, J, Finnegan, PM, Lovelock, CE, Plaxton, WC, Price, CA, Scheible, W-R, Shane, MW, White, PJ and Raven, JA (2012) Opportunities for improving phosphorus-use efficiency in crop plants. New Phytologist 195, 306–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walkley, A and Black, IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar