Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:45:57.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Light environment, gas exchange, and annual growth of saplings of three species of rain forest trees in Costa Rica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Steven F. Oberbauer ,
David B. Clark ,
Deborah A. Clark ,
Paul M. Rich  and
Gerardo Vega
Steven F. Oberbauer*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, and Fairchild Tropical Garden, 11935 Old Cutler Road, Miami, FL 33156
David B. Clark
Affiliation:
La Selva Biological Station, Organization for Tropical Studies, Apartado 676, 2050 San Pedro de Montes de Oca, Costa Rica
Deborah A. Clark
Affiliation:
La Selva Biological Station, Organization for Tropical Studies, Apartado 676, 2050 San Pedro de Montes de Oca, Costa Rica
Paul M. Rich
Affiliation:
Biological Sciences, Haworth Hall, University of Kansas, Lawrence KS, 66045
Gerardo Vega
Affiliation:
La Selva Biological Station, Organization for Tropical Studies, Apartado 676, 2050 San Pedro de Montes de Oca, Costa Rica
*
1Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Light environment, leaf physiological characteristics, and growth were compared for forest-grown saplings of three species of tropical trees with known life histories. Light environment was assessed both by hemispherical canopy photography and a quantitative visual index of crown illumination. Leaf gas exchange characteristics were measured by infrared gas analysis. The species tested included Lecythis ampla, a species tolerant of understorey conditions, Pithecellobium elegans, a species found in relatively bright sites, and Simarouba amara, a fast-growing, light-demanding species.

Annual height and diameter growth did not significantly differ between the three species, but highest average rates were found for Simarouba. Likewise, saplings of the three species were found in similar low light environments although Simarouba saplings were found in slightly brighter sites and Lecythis saplings were found in the lowest light environments. Despite similar light regimes, the species differed markedly in leaf area and gas exchange. Leaf areas of Lecythis saplings were five and ten-fold greater than Simarouba and Pithecellobium saplings, respectively. Light-saturated leaf photosynthesis and leaf dark respiration rates of Lecythis were about half those of Simarouba; rates of Pithecellobium were intermediate. Lecythis had the highest leaf photosynthesis at understorey diffuse light levels. Measures of annual growth were positively correlated with estimates of both direct and diffuse light with the strongest correlations between sapling performance and diffuse light.

Keywords

Costa Ricahemispherical photographdirect lightdiffuse lightdark respirationlight-saturated photosynthesisnon-pioneer
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , November 1993 , pp. 511 - 523
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Anderson, M. C. 1964. Studies of the woodland light climate. I. The photographic computation of light conditions. Journal of Ecology 52:27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augspurger, C. K. 1984. Light requirements of neotropical tree seedlings: a comparative study of growth and survival. Journal of Ecology 72:777–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazzaz, F. A. 1984. Dynamics of wet tropical forests and their species strategies. Pp. 233–243 in Medina, E., Mooney, H. A. & Vazquez-Yanes, C. (eds). Physiological ecology of plants of the wet tropics. D. W. Junk, Publishers, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazzaz, F. A. & Pickett, S. T. A. 1980. Physiological ecology of tropical succession: a comparative review. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11:287–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chazdon, R. L. 1988. Sunflecks and their importance to forest understory plants. Advances in Ecological Research 18:1–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chazdon, R. L. & Pearcy, R. W. 1986a. Photosynthetic responses to light variation in rain forest species. I. Induction under constant and fluctuating light conditions. Oecologia 69:517–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chazdon, R. L. & Pearcy, R. W. 1986b. Photosynthetic responses to light variation in rain forest species. II. Carbon gain and photosynthetic efficiency during lightflecks. Oecologia 69:524–531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, D. A. & Clark, D. B. 1987. Análisis de la regeneracíon de árboles del dosel en bosque muy húmedo tropical: aspectos teóricos y prácticos. Revista Biología Tropical 35[suppl]:41–54.Google Scholar
Clark, D. A. & Clark, D. B. 1992. Life history diversity of canopy and emergent trees in a neotropical rain forest. Ecological Monographs 62:315–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, H. C. & Field, D. R. B. 1978. A long-term surveillance system for British woodland vegetation. Department of Forestry, Oxford University, Oxford.Google Scholar
Fetcher, N., Oberbauer, S. F., Rojas, G. & Strain, B. R. 1987. Efectos del régimen de luz sobre la fotosíntesis y el crecimiento en plántulas del árboles de un bosque lluvioso tropical de Costa Rica. Revista Biologia Tropical 35(suppl):97–110.Google Scholar
Fetcher, N., Strain, B. R. & Oberbauer, S. F. 1983. Effects of light regime on the growth, leaf morphology, and water relations of seedlings of two species of tropical trees. Oecologia 58:314–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartshorn, G. S. 1983. Plants. Pp. 118–157 in Janzen, D. H. (ed.). Costa Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois USA.Google Scholar
Hogan, K. P. 1988. Photosynthesis in two neotropical palm species. Functional Ecology 2:371–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, G. E. & Knight, D. H. 1983. Tree growth, mortality, recruitment, and canopy gap formation during a 10-year period in tropical moist forest. Ecology 64:1075–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langenheim, J. H., Osmond, C. B., Brooks, A. & Ferrar, P. J. 1984. Photosynthedc responses to light in seedlings of selected Amazonian and Australian rainforest tree species. Oecologia 63:215–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oberbauer, S. F. & Strain, B. R. 1984. Photosynthesis and successional status of Costa Rican rain forest trees. Photosynthesis Research 5:227–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oberbauer, S. F., Clark, D. A., Clark, D. B. & Quesada, M. 1989. Comparative analysis of photosynthetic light environments within the crowns of juvenile rain forest trees. Tree Physiology 5:13–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oberbauer, S. F., Clark, D. B., Clark, D. A. & Quesada, M. 1988. Crown light environments of saplings of two species of rain forest emergent trees. Oecologia 75:207–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearcy, R. W. 1983. The light environment and growth of C3 and C4 tree species in the understory of a Hawaiian forest. Oecologia 58:19–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearcy, R. W. 1987. Photosynthetic gas exchange responses of Australian tropical forest trees in canopy, gap and understory micro-environments. Functional Ecology 1:169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearcy, R. W. 1988. Photosynthetic utilisation of lightflecks by understory plants. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 15:223–238.Google Scholar
Pfitsch, W. A. & Pearcy, R. W. 1989a. Daily carbon gain by Adenocaulon bicolor (Asteraceae), a redwood forest understory herb, in relation to its light environment. Oecologia 80:465–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfitsch, W. A. & Pearcy, R. W. 1989b. Steady-state and dynamic photosynthetic response of Adenocaulon bicolor (Asteraceae) in its redwood forest habitat. Oecologia 80:471–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popma, J. & Bongers, F. 1991. Acclimation of seedlings of three Mexican tropical rain forest tree species to a change in light availability. Journal of Tropical Ecology 7:85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, P. M. 1989. A manual for analysis of hemispherical canopy photography. Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-11733-M. 81 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, P. M., Clark, D. B., Clark, D. A. & Oberbauer, S. F. 1993. Long-term study of solar radiation regimes in a tropical wet forest using quantum sensors and hemispherical photography. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, P. M., Ranken, D. M. & George, J. S. 1989. A manual for microcomputer image analysis. LA-11732-M. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico. 76 pp.Google Scholar
Riddoch, I., Grace, J., Fasehun, F. E., Riddoch, B. & Lapidos, D. O. 1991. Photosynthesis and successional status of seedlings in a tropical semi-deciduous rain forest in Nigeria. Journal of Ecology 79:491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, J. P. 1960. Ecological studies on rain forest in northern Suriname. Proceedings Konintlijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen 253:1–267.Google Scholar
Swaine, M. D. & Whitmore, T. C. 1988. On the definition of ecological species groups in tropical rain forests. Vegetatio 75:81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar