Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T11:44:49.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Increased female reproduction favours the large-seeded palm Attalea humilis in small Atlantic Forest fragments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2012

Cecilia S. Andreazzi ,
Alexandra S. Pires ,
Clarissa S. Pimenta  and
Fernando A. S. Fernandez
Cecilia S. Andreazzi
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação de Populações, Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. CP 68020, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21941-902, Brazil Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, CP 68020, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21941-902, Brazil
Alexandra S. Pires
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação de Populações, Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. CP 68020, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21941-902, Brazil Laboratório de Estudo e Conservação de Florestas, Departamento de Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro. Rodovia BR 465, Km 07, Seropédica, RJ, 23890-000, Brazil
Clarissa S. Pimenta
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação de Populações, Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. CP 68020, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21941-902, Brazil
Fernando A. S. Fernandez*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação de Populações, Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. CP 68020, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21941-902, Brazil
*
1Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Palms are important components of tropical forest plant communities, due both to their abundance (Henderson et al. 2000) and to the network of interactions with their pollinators and dispersers (Henderson 2002, Zona & Henderson 1989). Forest fragmentation alters the biotic and abiotic conditions of habitats (Ewers & Didham 2006, Fahrig 2003) and it has been observed that Attalea palms increase their densities in disturbed sites (Aguiar & Tabarelli 2009, Andreazzi et al. 2012, Lorenzi et al. 2004). Increased light availability (Salm 2005, Souza & Martins 2004), changes in seed dispersal and predation patterns (Andreazzi et al. 2012, Pimentel & Tabarelli 2004, Wright et al. 2000), and ability to recover after disturbance (Souza & Martins 2004) are among the main mechanisms that have been proposed to explain enhanced palm densities. However, how altered conditions following disturbances influence the dynamics of flower and fruit production is still little understood.

Keywords

Brazilhabitat fragmentationpalmsreproductive phenologyseasonality
Type
Short Communication
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , May 2012 , pp. 321 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

AGUIAR, A. V. & TABARELLI, M. 2009. Edge effects and seedling bank depletion: the role played by the early successional palm Attalea oleifera (Arecaceae) in the Atlantic Forest. Biotropica 42:158–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ALMEIDA, L. B. & GALETTI, M. 2007. Seed dispersal and spatial distribution of Attalea geraensis (Arecaceae) in two remnants of Cerrado in Southeastern Brazil. Acta Oecologica 32:180–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANDREAZZI, C. S., PIMENTA, C. S., PIRES, A. S., FERNANDEZ, F. A. S., OLIVEIRA-SANTOS, L. G. & MENEZES, J. F. S. 2012. Increased productivity and reduced seed predation favor a large-seeded palm in small Atlantic Forest fragments. Biotropica 44:237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BAROT, S., MITJA, D., MIRANDA, I., MEIJA, G. D. & GRIMALDI, M. 2005. Reproductive plasticity in an Amazonian palm. Evolutionary Ecology Research 7:1051–1065.Google Scholar
BERRY, E. J. & GORCHOV, D. L. 2006. Female fecundity is dependent on substrate, rather than male abundance, in the wind-pollinated, dioecious understory palm Chamaedorea radicalis. Biotropica 39:186–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BROTHERS, T. S. & SPINGARN, A. 1992. Forest fragmentation and alien plant invasion of central Indiana old-growth forests. Conservation Biology 6:91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CARVALHO, F. A., NASCIMENTO, M. T. & BRAGA, J. M. A. 2006. Composição e riqueza florística do componente arbóreo da Floresta Atlântica submontana na região de Imbaú, Município de Silva Jardim, RJ. Acta Botanica Brasilica 20:727–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CARVALHO, F. A., NASCIMENTO, M. T. & OLIVEIRA-FILHO, A. T. 2008. Composição, riqueza e heterogeneidade da flora arbórea da bacia do Rio São João, RJ, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 22:929–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CUNNINGHAM, S. A. 1997. The effect of light environment, leaf area, and stored carbohydrates on inflorescence production by a rain forest understory palm. Oecologia 111:36–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CUNNINGHAM, S. A. 2000. Effects of habitat fragmentation on the reproductive ecology of four plant species in Mallee Woodland. Conservation Biology 14:758–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DE STEVEN, D., WINDSOR, D. M., PUTZ, F. E. & DE LEON, B. 1987. Vegetative and reproductive phenologies of a palm assemblage in Panama. Biotropica 19:342–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EWERS, R. M. & DIDHAM, R. K. 2006. Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biological Reviews 81:117–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FAHRIG, L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 34:487–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FRAGOSO, J. M. V. 2005. The role of trophic interactions in community initiation, maintenance and degradation. Pp. 311–327 in Burslem, D. F. R. P., Pinard, M. A. & Hartley, S. E. (eds.). Biotic interactions in the tropics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
HAMAN, A. 2004. Flowering and fruiting phenology of a Philippine submontane rain forest: climate factors as proximate and ultimate causes. Journal of Ecology 92:24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HENDERSON, A. 2002. Evolution and ecology of palms. New YorkBotanical Garden Press, Bronx.Google Scholar
HENDERSON, A., FISCHER, B., SCARIOT, A., WHITAKER PACHECO, M. A. & PARDINI, R. 2000. Flowering phenology of a palm community in a central Amazon forest. Brittonia 52:149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LAURANCE, W. F., RANKIN-DE MERONA, J. M., ANDRADE, A., LAURANCE, S. G., D'ANGELO, S., LOVEJOY, T. E. & VASCONCELOS, H. L. 2003. Rain-forest fragmentation and the phenology of Amazonian tree communities. Journal of Tropical Ecology 19:343–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LORENZI, H., SOUZA, H. M., MEDEIROS-COSTA, J. T., CERQUEIRA, L. S. C. & FERREIRA, E. 2004. Palmeiras Brasileiras e Exóticas Cultivadas. Plantarum, Nova Odessa. 432 pp.Google Scholar
MURCIA, C. 1995. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10:50–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PIMENTEL, D. S. & TABARELLI, M. 2004. Seed dispersal of the palm Attalea oleifera in a remnant of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biotropica 36:74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SALM, R. 2005. The importance of forest disturbance for the recruitment of the large arborescent palm Attalea maripa in a seasonally-dry Amazonian forest. Biota Neotropica 5 (n1) – BN00305012005.Google Scholar
SCARIOT, A., LLERAS, E. & HAY, J. D. 1995. Flowering and fruiting phenologies of the palm Acrocomia aculeata: patterns and consequences. Biotropica 27:168–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SOUZA, A. E. & MARTINS, F. R. 2004. Population structure and dynamics of a neotropical palm in fire-impacted fragments of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biodiversity and Conservation 13:1611–1632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VAN SCHAIK, C. P., TERBORGH, J. W. & WRIGHT, S. J. 1993. The phenology of tropical forests: adaptive significance and consequence for primary consumers. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24:353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VOEKS, R. A. 1988. Changing sexual expression of a Brazilian rain forest palm (Attalea funifera Mart.) Biotropica 20:107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VOEKS, R. A. 2002. Reproductive ecology of the piassava palm (Attalea funifera) of Bahia, Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology 18:121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WRIGHT, S. J., ZEBALLOS, H., DOMÍNGUEZ, I., GALLARDO, M. M., MORENO, M. C. & IBAÑEZ, R. 2000. Poachers alter mammal abundance, seed dispersal, and seed predation in a Neotropical forest. Conservation Biology 14:227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ZAR, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. (Fourth edition). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs. 662 pp.Google Scholar
ZONA, S. & HENDERSON, A. 1989. A review of animal-mediated seed dispersal of palms. Selbyana 11:6–21.Google Scholar