Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:54:15.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Habitat use by a mixed feeder: impala Aepyceros melampus in a heterogeneous protected area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2018

Bob Mandinyenya ,
Norman Monks ,
Peter J. Mundy ,
Allan Sebata Open the ORCID record for Allan Sebata [Opens in a new window]  and
Albert Chirima
Bob Mandinyenya*
Affiliation:
Department of Forest Resources & Wildlife Management, National University of Science & Technology, P.O. Box AC 939, Ascot, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe African Lion & Environmental Research Trust, No. 8 Bata Building, Livingstone Way, Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe
Norman Monks
Affiliation:
African Lion & Environmental Research Trust, No. 8 Bata Building, Livingstone Way, Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe
Peter J. Mundy
Affiliation:
Department of Forest Resources & Wildlife Management, National University of Science & Technology, P.O. Box AC 939, Ascot, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
Allan Sebata
Affiliation:
Department of Forest Resources & Wildlife Management, National University of Science & Technology, P.O. Box AC 939, Ascot, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
Albert Chirima
Affiliation:
Department of Forest Resources & Wildlife Management, National University of Science & Technology, P.O. Box AC 939, Ascot, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Although large herbivore habitat use has been extensively studied, more information is still required on the use of heterogeneous vegetation types. Over 3 y we carried out monthly road transects in the Zambezi National Park (ZNP), Zimbabwe, to determine the impala density in each of five vegetation types. In addition we determined grass and browse chemical composition to test if at the time the impala switches from grass to browse, grass nutritive quality had declined below that of browse. Furthermore, grass height was measured in the five vegetation types. The impala used mixed, acacia and terminalia vegetation types, which constituted 37% of the protected area and avoided grassland and the predominant Zambezi teak (60% of ZNP) vegetation types. At the time of the diet switch by the impala from grass to browse, woody plant leaf nutritive quality was higher than grass in terms of nitrogen, calcium and acid detergent fibre content. The three vegetation types used by the impala had short to medium grass height. We concluded that when the impala switched from grass to browse the grass nutritive quality was lower than that of the browse.

Keywords

African savannabrowsegrassheterogeneousnutritive qualityprotected areas
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 34 , Issue 6 , November 2018 , pp. 378 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ANDERSON, T. M., HOPCRAFT, J. G. C., EBY, S., RITCHIE, M., GRACE, J. B. & OLFF, H. 2010. Landscape-scale analyses suggest both nutrient and antipredator advantages to Serengeti herbivore hotspots. Ecology 91:1519–1529.Google Scholar
ARSENAULT, R. & OWEN-SMITH, N. 2008. Resource partitioning by grass height among grazing ungulates does not follow body size relation. Oikos 117:1711–1717.Google Scholar
AOAC (ASSOCIATION OF OFFICIAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS) 2012. Official methods of analysis. (Nineteenth edition). AOAC International, Rockville. 140 pp.Google Scholar
BHOLA, N., OGUTU, J. O., SAID, M. Y., PIEPHO, H. P. & OLFF, H. 2012. The distribution of large herbivore hotspots in relation to environmental and anthropogenic correlates in the Mara region of Kenya. Journal of Animal Ecology 81:1268–1287.Google Scholar
BUCKLAND, S. T., ANDERSEN, D. R., BURNHAM, K. P., LAAKE, J. L., BORCHERS, D. L. & THOMAS, L. 2001. Introduction to distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 432 pp.Google Scholar
BUKOMBE, J., KITTLE, A., SENZOTA, R., MDUMA, S., FRYXELL, J. & SINCLAIR, A. R. E. 2017. Resource selection, utilization and seasons influence spatial distribution of ungulates in the western Serengeti National Park. African Journal of Ecology 56:3–11.Google Scholar
CHENJE, M., SOLA, L. & PALECNZY, D. (eds) 1998. The state of Zimbabwe's environment. Ministry of Mines, Environment and Tourism, Government of the Republic of Zimbabwe, Harare. 201 pp.Google Scholar
CHILDES, S. & WALKER, B. 1987. Ecology and dynamics of the woody vegetation on the Kalahari sands in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe. Plant Ecology 72:111–128.Google Scholar
ESRI 2011. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.Google Scholar
ESTES, R.D. 1991. The behavior guide to African mammals. University of California Press, London. 611 pp.Google Scholar
FRITZ, H. & BOURGAREL, M. 2013. Aepyceros melampus impala. Pp. 479–487 in Kingdon, J. & Hoffmann, M. (eds), Mammals of Africa. Volume VI: pigs, hippopotamuses, chevrotain, giraffes, deer and bovids. Bloomsbury Publishing, London.Google Scholar
FRYXELL, J. M., WILMSHURST, J. F. & SINCLAIR, A. R. E. 2004. Predictive models of movement by Serengeti grazers. Ecology 85:2429–2435.Google Scholar
GORDON, I. J. & ILLIUS, A. W. 1996. The nutritional ecology of African ruminants: a reinterpretation. Journal of Animal Ecology 65:18–28.Google Scholar
GRASMAN, B. T. & HELLGREN, E. C. 1993. Phosphorus nutrition in white tailed deer: nutrient balance, physiological responses, and antler growth. Ecology 74:2279–2296.Google Scholar
GROBLER, J. P., HAYTER, K. N., LABUSCHAGNE, C., NEL, E. J. & COETZER, W. G. 2017. The genetic status of naturally occurring black-nosed impala from northern South Africa. Mammalian Biology 8:27–33.Google Scholar
HANSEN, R. M., MUGAMBI, M. M. & BAUNI, S. M. 1985. Diets and trophic ranking of ungulates of the northern Serengeti. Journal of Wildlife Management 49:823–827.Google Scholar
HOPCRAFT, J., MORALES, J., BEYER, H., BORNER, M., MWANGOMO, E., SINCLAIR, A., OLFF, H. & HAYDON, D. 2014. Competition, predation, and migration: individual choice patterns of Serengeti migrants captured by hierarchical models. Ecological Monographs 84:355–372.Google Scholar
JARMAN, P. J. 1972. Seasonal distribution of large mammal populations in the unflooded Middle Zambezi Valley. Journal of Applied Ecology 9:283–299.Google Scholar
KLEIN, D. R. & FAIRALL, N. 1986. Comparative foraging behaviour and associated energetics of impala and blesbok. Journal of Applied Ecology 23:489–502.Google Scholar
KLEYNHANS, E. J., JOLLES, A. E., BOS, M. R. E. & OLFF, H. 2011. Resource partitioning along multiple niche dimensions in differently sized African savanna grazers. Oikos 120:591–600.Google Scholar
MACANDZA, A. V., OWEN-SMITH, N. & CROSS, P. C. 2004. Forage selection by African buffalo in the late dry season in two landscapes. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 34:113–121.Google Scholar
MCNAUGHTON, S. J. 1990. Mineral nutrition and seasonal movements of African migratory ungulates. Nature 345:613–615.Google Scholar
MENKE, K. H. & STEINGASS, H. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research 23:103–116.Google Scholar
MURRAY, M. G. 1995. Specific nutrient requirements and migration of wildebeest. Pp. 231–256 in Sinclair, A. R. E. & Arcese, P. (eds). Serengeti II: dynamics, management, and conservation of an ecosystem. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
O'KANE, C. A. J., DUFFY, K. J., PAGE, B. R. & MACDONALD, D. W. 2011. Overlap and seasonal shifts in use of woody plant species amongst a guild of savanna browsers. Journal of Tropical Ecology 27:249–258.Google Scholar
O'KANE, C. A. J., DUFFY, K. J., PAGE, B. R. & MACDONALD, D. W. 2013. Effects of resource limitation on habitat usage by the browser guild in Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park, South Africa. Journal of Tropical Ecology 29:39–47.Google Scholar
O'KANE, C. A. J., PAGE, B. R. & MACDONALD, D. W. 2014. Differing influences of resource availability on the demographics and habitat selection of wildebeest compared with impala. Journal of Tropical Ecology 30:189–198.Google Scholar
RDUCH, V. 2016. Population characteristics and coexistence of puku (Kobus vardonii) and impala (Aepyceros melampus) in and around Kafue National Park, Zambia. Mammalian Biology 81: 350–360.Google Scholar
SEBATA, A., NDLOVU, L. R. & DUBE, J. S. 2011. Chemical composition, in vitro dry matter digestibility and in vitro gas production of five woody species browsed by Matebele goats (Capra hircus L.) in a semi-arid savanna, Zimbabwe. Animal Feed Science and Technology 170:122–125.Google Scholar
SENSENIG, R. L., DEMMENT, M. W. & LACA, E. A. 2010. Allometric scaling predicts preferences for burned patches in a guild of East African grazers. Ecology 91:2898–2907.Google Scholar
SHANNON, G., MACKEY, R. L. & SLOTOW, R. 2013. Diet selection and seasonal dietary switch of a large sexually dimorphic herbivore. Acta Oecologica 46:48–55.Google Scholar
SINCLAIR, A. R. E. 1983. The adaptations of African ungulates and their effects on community function. Pp. 401–426 in Boulière, F. (ed.). Ecosystems of the World 13: tropical savannas. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
SINCLAIR, A. R. E., MDUMA, S. & BRASHARES, J. S. 2003. Patterns of predation in a diverse predator-prey system. Nature 425:288–290.Google Scholar
SMITHERS, R. H. N. 1983. The mammals of the southern African subregion. University of Pretoria, Pretoria. 566 pp.Google Scholar
THOMAS, L., BUCKLAND, S. T., REXSTAD, E. A., LAAKE, J. L., STRINDBERG, S., HEDLEY, S. L., BISHOP, J. R., MARQUES, T. A. & BURNHAM, K. P. 2010. Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. Journal of Applied Ecology 47:5–14.Google Scholar
WATANABE, F. S. & OLSEN, S. R. 1965. Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 29:677–678.Google Scholar
WILMSHURST, J. F., FRYXELL, J. M. & BERGMAN, C. M. 2000. The allometry of patch selection in ruminants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B–Biological Sciences 267:345–349.Google Scholar
WRONSKI, T. 2003. Fire induced changes in the foraging behaviour of impala Aepyceros melampus in the Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda. African Journal of Ecology 41:56–60.Google Scholar
ZENGEYA, F. M., MUTANGA, O. & MURWIRA, A. 2013. Linking remotely sensed forage quality estimates from WorldView-2 multispectral data with cattle distribution in a savanna landscape. International Journal of Applied Earth Observational Geoinformatics 21:513–524.Google Scholar