Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:40:47.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of habitat, leaf damage and leaf rolling on the predation risk of caterpillars in the tropical rain forest of Borneo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2019

Alicja Witwicka ,
Danuta Frydryszak ,
Andrzej Antoł  and
Marcin Czarnoleski
Alicja Witwicka*
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387 Kraków, Poland
Danuta Frydryszak
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387 Kraków, Poland Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Mickiewicza 33, 31-120 Kraków, Poland
Andrzej Antoł
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387 Kraków, Poland
Marcin Czarnoleski
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387 Kraków, Poland
*
*Author for correspondence: Alicja Witwicka, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Addressing what affects predation among caterpillars, we conducted an experiment in a Bornean rain forest on 212 clay models of Tortricidae caterpillars (the herbivore) and 53 trees of Kopsia pauciflora (the host), located either in the open or under closed canopies. We predicted that the frequency of predatory attacks towards caterpillars increases (1) in canopy gaps and (2) on leaves damaged by herbivory, but (3) decreases among caterpillars that wrap their body in leaves. Each plant with caterpillar models was consecutively allocated to one of four treatments: caterpillars artificially rolled in leaves vs caterpillars on unrolled leaves, and caterpillars on artificially damaged vs undamaged leaves. Each time, caterpillar models were placed on the plants for 48 h, and then replaced with new models that were subjected to a new treatment. On average, our caterpillar models had a 21% chance of being attacked per 24 h. More attacks were performed by insects (81.6%) than birds. The attack frequency did not depend on the canopy cover or on leaf damage, but decreased among models rolled in leaves. This pattern was mainly attributable to insect attacks, which were also more frequent than bird attacks. Overall, the Tortricidae caterpillars seem to suffer comparable predation rates in the open and under closed canopies irrespective of the herbivory damage of leaves, but their leaf-rolling behaviour might reduce predation.

Keywords

Lepidopterapopulation controlpredator–prey interactionssecondary foresttop-down control
Type
Short Communication
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , September 2019 , pp. 251 - 253
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature cited

Agrawal, A (1998) Leaf damage and associated cues induce aggressive ant recruitment in a neotropical ant-plant. Ecology 79, 2100–2112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, J, Lennox, GD, Ferreira, J, Berenguer, E, Lees, AC, Mac Nally, R, Thomson, JR, Ferraz, SF, Louzada, J, Oliveira, VH, Parry, L, Solar, RR, Vieira, IC, Aragão, LE, Begotti, RA, Braga, RF, Cardoso, TM, De Oliveira, RC Jr, Souza, CM Jr, Moura, NG, Nunes, SS, Siqueira, JV, Pardini, R, Silveira, JM, Vaz-De-Mello, FZ, Veiga, RC, Venturieri, A and Gardner, TA (2016) Anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation. Nature 535, 144–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, D, Maechler, M, Bolker, B and Walker, S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhm, SM, Wells, K and Kalko, EK (2011) Top-down control of herbivory by birds and bats in the canopy of temperate broad-leaved oaks (Quercus robur). PLoS ONE 6, e17857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappuccino, N (1993) Mutual use of leaf-shelters by lepidopteran larvae on paper birch. Ecological Entomology 18, 287–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coley, PD (1980) Effects of leaf age and plant life history patterns on herbivory. Nature 284, 545–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewers, MR, Boyle, MJW, Gleave, RA, Plowman, NS, Benedick, S, Bernard, H, Bishop, TR, Bakhtiar, EY, Chey, V, Chung, AYC, Davies, RG, Edwards, DP, Eggleton, P, Fayle, TM, Hardwick, SR, Homathevi, R, Kitching, RL, Khoo, MS, Luke, SH, March, JJ, Nilus, R, Pfeifer, M, Rao, SV, Sharp, AC, Snaddon, JL, Stork, NE, Struebig, MJ, Wearn, OR, Yusah, KM and Turner, EC (2015) Logging cuts the functional importance of invertebrates in tropical rainforest. Nature Communications 6, 6836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heath, MR, Speirs, DC and Steele, JH (2014) Understanding patterns and processes in models of trophic cascades. Ecology Letters 17, 101–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loiselle, BA & Farji-Brener, AG (2002) What’s up? An experimental comparison of predation levels between canopy and understory in a tropical wet forest. Biotropica 34, 327–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molleman, F, Remmel, T and Sam, K (2015) Phenology of predation on insects in a tropical forest: temporal variation in attack rate on dummy caterpillars. Biotropica 48, 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murakami, M (1999) Effect of avian predation on survival of leaf rolling lepidopterous larvae. Researches on Population Ecology 41, 135–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posa, MRC, Sodhi, NS and Koh, LP (2007) Predation on artificial nests and caterpillar models across a disturbance gradient in Subic Bay, Philippines. Journal of Tropical Ecology. 23, 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remmel, T, Davison, J and Tammaru, T (2011) Quantifying predation on folivorous insect larvae: the perspective of life-history evolution. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 104, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roslin, T, Hardwick, B, Novotny, V, Petry, WK, Andrew, NR, Asmus, A, Barrio, IC, Basset, Y, Boesing, AL, Bonebrake, TC, Cameron, EK, Dáttilo, W, Donoso, DA, Drozd, P, Gray, CL, Hik, DS, Hill, SJ, Hopkins, T, Huang, S, Koane, B, Laird-Hopkins, B, Laukkanen, L, Lewis, OT, Milne, S, Mwesige, I, Nakamura, A, Nell, CS, Nichols, E, Prokura, A, Sam, K, Schmidt, NM, Slade, A, Slade, V, Suchanková, A, Teder, T, Van Nouhuys, S, Vandvik, V, Weissflog, A, Zhukovich, V and Slade, EM (2017) Higher predation risk for insect prey at low latitudes and elevations. Science 356, 742–744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sam, K, Koane, B and Novotny, V (2015) Herbivore damage increases avian and ant predation of caterpillars on trees along a complete elevational forest gradient in Papua New Guinea. Ecography 38, 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanz, JJ (2001) Experimentally increased insectivorous bird density results in a reduction of caterpillar density and leaf damage to Pyrenean oak. Ecological Research 19, 387–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tvardikova, K and Novotny, V (2012) Predation on exposed and leaf-rolling artificial caterpillars in tropical forests of Papua New Guinea. Journal of Tropical Ecology 28, 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, DM and Sherratt, TN (2016) Why is the world green? The interactions of top–down and bottom–up processes in terrestrial vegetation ecology. Plant Ecology and Diversity 9, 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams-Guillén, K, Perfecto, I and Vandermeer, J (2008) Bats limit insects in a neotropical agroforestry system. Science 320, 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollrab, S, Diehl, S and De Ross, AM (2012) Simple rules describe bottom-up and top-down control in food webs with alternative energy pathway. Ecology Letters 15, 935–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar