Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:54:55.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ecological relationships between columnar cacti and nectar-feeding bats in Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Alfonso Valiente-Banuet ,
María Del Coro Arizmendi ,
Alberto Rojas-Martínez  and
Laura Domínguez-Canseco
Alfonso Valiente-Banuet
Affiliation:
Centro de Ecología, Universidad National Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-275México, 04510, D.F.
María Del Coro Arizmendi
Affiliation:
Centro de Ecología, Universidad National Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-275México, 04510, D.F.
Alberto Rojas-Martínez
Affiliation:
Centro de Ecología, Universidad National Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-275México, 04510, D.F.
Laura Domínguez-Canseco
Affiliation:
Centro de Ecología, Universidad National Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-275México, 04510, D.F.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A bibliographical and herbarium investigation on the pollination syndrome of Mexican columnar cacti (tribe Pachycereeae) was conducted. Most Mexican species of columnar cacti show a chiropterophilic-pollination syndrome and they flower synchronously in March to May. The floral biology, reproductive system and visitors (to both fruits and flowers) of Neobuxbaumia tetetzo, the most abundant and dominant columnar cactus of succulent forest in the Tehuacan Valley, were studied. This species reached densities of c. 1200 individuals ha−1. The bats Leptonycteris curasoae and Choeronycteris mexicana were its only pollinators, whilst a more diverse array of visitors disperse seeds. Contrary to findings for multiple pollinators of columnar cacti in extratropical deserts in North America, the relationships between N. tetetzo and nectar-feeding bats was strong and tightly coupled in Mexico.

Keywords

Choeronycteris mexicanacolumnar cactidistributional patternsLeptonycteris curasoaeMexiconectar-feeding batsNeobuxbaumia tetetzopollinationseed dispersal
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 103 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Alcorn, S. M., McGregor, S. E., Butler, G. D. & Kurtz, E. B. 1959. Pollination requirements of the saguaro (Camegiea gigantea). Cactus and Succulent Journal 31:39–41.Google Scholar
Alcorn, S. M., McGregor, S. E. & Olin, G. 1961. Pollination of Saguaro cactus by doves, nectar-feeding bats and honey bees. Science 132:1594–1595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcorn, S. M., McGregor, S. E. & Olin, G. 1962. Pollination requirements of the Organpipe cactus. Cactus and Succulent Journal 34:134–138.Google Scholar
Alvarez, T. & González, Q. L. 1970. Análisis polínico del contenido gástrico de murciélagos Glossophaginae de México. Anales de la Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, México 18:137–165.Google Scholar
Arita, H. T. 1991. Spatial segregation in long-nosed bats, Leptonycteris nivalis and Leptonycteris curasoae, in Mexico. Journal of Mammalogy 72:705–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arita, H. T. & Martínez Del Rio, C. 1990. Interacciones flor murciélago: un enfoque zooétntrico. Instituto de Biología, UNAM. Publicaciones especiales No. 4. México.Google Scholar
Beattie, A. J. 1971. A technique for the study of insect-borne pollen. Pan-Pacific Entomologist 47:82.Google Scholar
Bravo, H. 1978. Las cactáceas de México. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Vol. I. México.Google Scholar
Carpenter, R. & Graham, J. 1967. Physiological responses to temperature in the long-nosed bat Leptonycteris sanborni. Biochemical Physiology 22:709–722.Google ScholarPubMed
Cockrum, E. L. 1991. Seasonal distribution of northwestern populations of the long nosed bats family Phyllostomidae. Anales del Instituto de Biología. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Serie Zoología 62:181–202.Google Scholar
Dávila, A. P., Villasenor, J. L., Medina, L. R., Ramirez, R. A., Salinas, T. A., Sanchez-Ken, J. & Tenorio, L. P. 1993. Listados Flonsticos de México X. Flora del Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán. Instituto de Biología, UNAM, México.Google Scholar
Ezcurra, E., Valiente-Banuet, A., Flores-Villela, O. & Vazquez, E. In press. Vulnerability to global change in natural ecosystems and rural areas. As Roger, E. & Kasperson, J. X. (eds). Global environment risk. United Nations Press. Faegri, K. & Pijl, L. van der. 1979. The principles of pollination ecology. 3rd revised edition. Pergamon Press, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Fleming, T. H. 1993. Plant-visiting bats. American Scientist 81:460–467.Google Scholar
Fleming, T. H., Nunez, R. A., Da Silveira, L. S. L. 1993. Seasonal changes in the diets of migrant and non-migrant nectarivorous bats as revealed by carbon stable isotope analysis. Oecologia 94:72–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, E. 1973. Modifications al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen. Instituto de Geografia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México.Google Scholar
Gentry, H. S. 1982. Agaves of continental North America. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. 670 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, A. C. & Horak, K. E. 1978. Systematic anatomy and phytogeny of Mexican columnar cacti. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 65:999–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, A. C. & Nobel, P. S. 1986. The cactus primer. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, V. & Grant, K. A. 1979. The pollination spectrum in the Southwestern American cactus flora. Plant Systematics and Evolution 133:29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, V. & Hurd, P. D. 1979. Pollination of the Southwestern Opuntias. Plant Systematics and Evolution 133:15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, E. R. 1981. The mammals of North America. 2nd edition. Vol. 1. Wiley Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
Harper, J. L. 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Heithaus, E. R. 1982. Coevolution between bats and plants. Pp. 327–367 in Kunz, T. H. (ed.). Ecology of bats. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, D. J. 1972. Physiological adaptations in the syndrome of chiropterophily with emphasis on the bat Leptonycteris Lydekker. PhD Dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson. 217 pp.Google Scholar
Howell, D.J. 1974. Bats and pollen: physiological aspects of the syndrome of chiropterphily. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 48:263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, D. J. 1979. Flock foraging in nectar-feeding bats: advantages to the bats and the host plants. American Naturalist 114:23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, D. J. & Hodgkin, N. 1976. Feeding adaptation in hairs and tongue of nectar-feeding bats. Journal of Morphology 148:329–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koopman, K. F. 1981. The distribution patterns of new world nectar-feeding bats. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 68:352–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, S. C., Alcorn, S. M., Kurtz, E. B. & Butler, G. D. 1959. Bee visitors to Saguaro flowers. Journal of Economic Entomology 52:1002–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, S. C., Alcorn, S. M. & Olin, G. 1962. Pollination and pollinating agents of the saguaro. Ecology 43:259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNab, B. K. 1969. The economics of temperature regulation in Neotropical bats. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 31:227–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNab, B. K. 1980. Food habits, energetics and the population biology of mammals. American Naturalist 116:106–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morán, R. 1961. Visitantes de las flores de Pachycereus pringlei. Cactáceas y Suculentas Mexicanas (México) 6:94–96.Google Scholar
Morán, R. 1962. Visitors to the flowers of Pachycereus pringlei. Cactus and Succulent Journal 17:21.Google Scholar
Porsch, O. 1938. Das Bestäubungsleben der Kakteenblüte, I. Cactaceae, Jahrbuch Deutsch, Kakteen-Gesellschaft. 1938:1–80.Google Scholar
Porsch, O. 1939. Das Bestäubungsleben der Kakteenblüte, II. Cactauae, Jahrbuch Deutsch, Kakteen-Gesellschaft. 1939:81–142.Google Scholar
Quiroz, D. L., Xelhuantzi, M. S. & Zamora, M. C. 1986. Análisis palinólogico del contenido gastrointestinal de los murciélagos Glossophaga soricina y Leptonycteris yerbabuenae de las grutas de Juxdahuaca, Guerrero. Institute National de Antropología e Historia. Serie Prehistoria, México. 1:1–62.Google Scholar
Rzedowski, J. 1978. Vegetatión de México. Editorial Limusa, México.Google Scholar
Smith, C. E. 1965. Flora Tehuacan Valley. Fieldiana Botany 31:107–143.Google Scholar
Soriano, P. J., Sosa, M. & Rossell, O. 1991. Hábitos alimentarios de Glossophaga longirostris Miller (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) en una zona árida de los Andes venezolanos. Revista de Biología Tropical 39:263–268.Google Scholar
Sosa, M. & Soriano, P. 1992. Los murciélagos y los cactus: una relación muy estrecha. Carta Ecológica 61:7–10.Google Scholar
Valiente-Banuet, A., Briones, O., Bolongaro-Crevenna, A., Ezcurra, E., Rosas, M., Nunez, H., Barnard, G. & Vazquez, E. 1991. Spatial relationships between cacti and nurse shrubs in a semi-arid environment in central Mexico. Journal of Vegetation Science 2:15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valiente-Banuet, A. & Ezcurra, E. 1991. Shade as a cause of the association between the cactus Neobuxbaumia tetetzo and the nurse plant Mimosa luisana in the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico. Journal of Ecology 79:961–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, E. 1975. Mammals of the world. Vol. I. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. F. 1986. Avian frugivores and seed dispersal in Eastern North America. Pp. 223–279 in Johnston, R. F. (ed.). Current ornithology. Vol. 3. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar