Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T20:15:39.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diversity of fruits in Artibeus lituratus diet in urban and natural habitats in Brazil: a review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2020

Rafael de Souza Laurindo  and
Jeferson Vizentin-Bugoni
Rafael de Souza Laurindo*
Affiliation:
Instituto Sul Mineiro de Estudos e Conservação da Natureza, Monte Belo, MG, Brazil
Jeferson Vizentin-Bugoni
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Turner Hall, 1102 S Goodwin Ave, Urbana, Illinois, USA
*
*Author for correspondence: Rafael de Souza Laurindo, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The great fruit-eating bat (Artibeus lituratus) is a large-sized species that forages primarily on fruits. This species is widespread throughout the Neotropics, where it is common in natural areas and also occupies forest patches and cities. In this study, we review the composition of Artibeus lituratus diet in Brazil as well as the size of fruits and seeds, plant geographic origin, and sampling methods used in natural versus urban habitats. We show that Artibeus lituratus is able to consume a higher proportion of exotic fruits with large seeds in urban environments than in natural areas. Fruit diameter was not statistically different between environments, but both fruit and seed diameters are smaller when detected by fecal sampling than by other methods. This difference is likely due to the fact that in natural habitats studies are predominantly based on fecal samples, which hinders the detection of large unswallowed seeds. Consequently, we recommend the use of complementary sampling methods (not only the widely used technique of fecal sorting) in order to produce more accurate descriptions of frugivorous bats’ diets. We suggest that the ability to exploit fruits of exotic plant species including the ones with large seeds may be a key trait for the persistence of A. lituratus in urban habitats.

Keywords

ChiropterafrugivoryNeotropicsplant–animal interactionsseed dispersalurbanization
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , March 2020 , pp. 65 - 71
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature cited

Alberti, M, Correa, C, Marzluff, JM, Hendry, AP, Palkovacs, EP, Gotanda, KM, Hunt, VM, Apgar, TM and Zhou, Y (2017) Global urban signatures of phenotypic change in animal and plant populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 114, 8951–8956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ballesteros, CJ and Racero-Casarrubia, J (2012) Murciélagos del área urbana en la ciudad de Montería, Córdoba – Colombia. Revista MVZ Córdoba 17, 3193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaverri, G, Quirós, OE and Kunz, TH (2007) Ecological correlates of range size in the tent-making bat Artibeus watsoni. Journal of Mammalogy 88, 477–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelmi-Candusso, TA and Hämäläinen, AM (2019) Seeds and the city: the interdependence of zoochory and ecosystem dynamics in urban environments. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hougner, C, Colding, J and Söderqvist, T (2006) Economic valuation of a seed dispersal service in the Stockholm National Urban Park, Sweden. Ecological Economics 59, 364–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huston, M and Smith, T (1987) Plant succession: life history and competition. American Naturalist 130, 168–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jara-Servín, AM, Saldaña-Vázquez, RA and Schondube, JE (2017) Nutrient availability predicts frugivorous bat abundance in an urban environment. Mammalia 81, 367–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurindo, RS, Novaes, RLM, Vizentin-Bugoni, J and Gregorin, R (2019) The effects of habitat loss on bat-fruit networks. Biodiversity and Conservation 28, 589–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, VC, Clare, EL, Littlefair, JE, Ramli, R, Bhassu, S and Wilson, JJ (2018) Impact of urbanisation and agriculture on the diet of fruit bats. Urban Ecosystems 21, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinney, ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation 127, 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinney, ML (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosystems 11, 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melo, FPL, Rodriguez-Herrera, B, Chazdon, RL, Medellin, RA and Ceballos, GG (2009) Small tent-roosting bats promote dispersal of large-seeded plants in a Neotropical forest. Biotropica 41, 737–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muylaert, RDL, Stevens, RD, Esbérard, CEL, Mello, MAR, Garbino, GST, Varzinczak, LH, Faria, D, Weber, MDM, Kerches Rogeri, P, Regolin, AL, Oliveira, HFMD, Costa, LDM, Barros, MAS, Sabino-Santos, G, Crepaldi de Morais, MA, Kavagutti, VS, Passos, FC, Marjakangas, EL, Maia, FGM, Ribeiro, MC and Galetti, M (2017) ATLANTIC BATS: a data set of bat communities from the Atlantic Forests of South America. Ecology 98, 3227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nunes, H, Rocha, FL and Cordeiro-Estrela, P (2017) Bats in urban areas of Brazil: roosts, food resources and parasites in disturbed environments. Urban Ecosystems 20, 953–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oprea, M, Brito, D, Vieira, TB, Mendes, P, Lopes, SR, Fonseca, RM, Coutinho, RZ and Ditchfield, AD (2007) A note on the diet and foraging behavior of Artibeus lituratus (Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae) in an urban park in southeastern Brazil. Biota Neotropica 7, 297–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oprea, M, Mendes, P, Vieira, TB and Ditchfield, AD (2009) Do wooded streets provide connectivity for bats in an urban landscape? Biodiversity and Conservation 18, 2361–2371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parolin, LC, Bianconi, GV and Mikich, SB (2016) Consistency in fruit preferences across the geographical range of the frugivorous bats Artibeus, Carollia and Sturnira (Chiroptera). Iheringia. Série Zoologia 106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2016010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauchard, A, Aguayo, M, Peña, E and Urrutia, R (2006) Multiple effects of urbanization on the biodiversity of developing countries: the case of a fast-growing metropolitan area (Concepción, Chile). Biological Conservation 127, 272–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petri, L, Aragaki, S and Gomes, EPC (2018) Management priorities for exotic plants in an urban Atlantic Forest reserve. Acta Botanica Brasilica 32, 631–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reflora (2019) Herbário Virtual. Retrieved from http://reflora.jbrj.gov.br.Google Scholar
Santini, L, González-Suárez, M, Russo, D, Gonzalez-Voyer, A, Von Hardenberg, A and Ancillotto, L (2019) One strategy does not fit all: determinants of urban adaptation in mammals. Ecology Letters 22, 365–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvestre, SM, Rocha, PA, Cunha, MA, Santana, JP and Ferrari, SF (2016) Diet and seed dispersal potential of the white-lined bat, Platyrrhinus lineatus (E. Geoffroy, 1810), at a site in northeastern Brazil. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 51, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevelin, LC, Silveira, M, Port-Carvalho, M, Homem, DH and Cruz-Neto, AP (2013) Use of space by frugivorous bats (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) in a restored Atlantic forest fragment in Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management 291, 136–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zenni, RD and Ziller, SR (2011) An overview of invasive plants in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 34, 431–446.Google Scholar
Ziller, SR and Dechoum, MS (2013) Plantas e vertebrados exóticos invasores em unidades de conservação no Brasil. Biodiversidade Brasileira 3, 4–31.Google Scholar