Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:45:44.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coppice shoot dynamics in a tropical dry forest after human disturbance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2011

Mathieu Lévesque ,
Kurt P. McLaren  and
Morag A. McDonald
Mathieu Lévesque
Affiliation:
School of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography, Bangor University, Gwynedd, Wales LL57 2UW, UK
Kurt P. McLaren*
Affiliation:
Department of Life Sciences, University of the West Indies, Mona Campus, Mona, Kingston 7, Jamaica
Morag A. McDonald
Affiliation:
School of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography, Bangor University, Gwynedd, Wales LL57 2UW, UK
*
1Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Coppicing is an important regeneration mechanism in tropical dry forest after disturbance, but little is known about the long-term dynamics and the rate of recovery of the coppice shoots following clearance. This study reports on the growth and dynamics of coppice shoots following experimental cutting in a tropical dry forest in Jamaica. The fate of coppice shoots was tracked on a total of 481 stumps, representing 51 species over 10 y. The number of coppice shoots and the height and dbh of the leading shoots were measured on the tree stumps 14 mo and 10 y after cutting. Coppicing was vigorous for most tree species, but the average number of shoots per stump decreased significantly over the 9 y period, from 25 to 8 shoots per stump. The average height and diameter of the leading shoots after 10 y were 4.5 m and 3.8 cm, respectively, and the average percentage diameter recovered by the shoots varied between 36% and 95% among the species. Coppicing facilitates the long-term persistence of this dry forest, and the rapid growth of coppice shoots contributed to the resilience of most species after cutting.

Keywords

Caribbeanforest recoveryJamaicaregenerationresiliencesproutingstumpstree cutting
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , May 2011 , pp. 259 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ADAMS, C. D. 1972. Flowering plants of Jamaica. University of West Indies, Mona, Jamaica. 848 pp.Google Scholar
BELLINGHAM, P. J. & SPARROW, A. D. 2000. Resprouting as a life history strategy in woody plant communities. Oikos 89:409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BOND, W. J. & MIDGLEY, J. J. 2001. Ecology of sprouting in woody plants: the persistence niche. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:45–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BOND, W. J. & MIDGLEY, J. J. 2003. The evolutionary ecology of sprouting in woody plants. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164:S103–S114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHAPIN, F. S., SCHULZE, E. & MOONEY, H. A. 1990. The ecology and economics of storage in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21:423–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DEL TREDICI, P. 2001. Sprouting in temperate trees: a morphological and ecological review. Botanical Review 67:121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DOBSON, A. J. 2002. An introduction to generalized linear models. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton. 240 pp.Google Scholar
ENQUIST, B. & NIKLAS, K. 2002. Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants. Science 295:1517–1520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EWEL, J. 1980. Tropical succession – manifold routes to maturity. Biotropica 12:2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GERHARDT, K. & HYTTEBORN, H. 1992. Natural dynamics and regeneration methods in tropical dry forests – an introduction. Journal of Vegetation Sciences 3:361–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KELLY, C. K. & BOWLER, M. G. 2002. Coexistence and relative abundance in forest trees. Nature 417:437–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KENNARD, D. K., GOULD, K., PUTZ, F. E., FREDERICKSEN, T. S. & MORALES, F. 2002. Effect of disturbance intensity on regeneration mechanisms in a tropical dry forest. Forest Ecology and Management 162:197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KNOX, K. & CLARKE, P. 2005. Nutrient availability induces contrasting allocation and starch formation in resprouting and obligate seeding shrubs. Functional Ecology 19:690–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LOVELESS, A. R. & ASPREY, G. F. 1957. The dry evergreen formations of Jamaica: I. The limestone hills of the south coast. Journal of Ecology 45:799–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LUOGA, E. J., WITKOWSKI, E. T. F. & BALKWILL, K. 2004. Regeneration by coppicing (resprouting) of miombo (African savanna) trees in relation to land use. Forest Ecology and Management 189:23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MCCULLAGH, P. & NELDER, J.A. 1989. Generalized linear models. (Second edition). Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton. 532 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MCDONALD, J. H. 2008. Data transformations. Pp. 148–152 in McDonald, J. H. (ed.). Handbook of biological statistics. Sparky House Publishing, Baltimore.Google Scholar
MCLAREN, K. P. 2001. The regeneration of a Jamaican dry limestone forest after different intensities of human disturbance. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Wales, Bangor, UK. 229 pp.Google Scholar
MCLAREN, K. P. & MCDONALD, M. A. 2003a. Coppice regrowth in a disturbed tropical dry limestone forest in Jamaica. Forest Ecology and Management 180:99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MCLAREN, K. P. & MCDONALD, M. A. 2003b. Seedling dynamics after different intensities of human disturbance in a tropical dry limestone forest in Jamaica. Journal of Tropical Ecology 19:567–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MCLAREN, K. P. & MCDONALD, M. A. 2003c. The effects of moisture and shade on seed germination and seedling survival in a tropical dry forest in Jamaica. Forest Ecology and Management 183:61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MILLER, P. M. 1999. Coppice shoot and foliar crown growth after disturbance of a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management 116:163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MOSTACEDO, B., PUTZ, F. E., FREDERICKSEN, T. S., VILLCA, A. & PALACIOS, T. 2009. Contributions of root and stump sprouts to natural regeneration of a logged tropical dry forest in Bolivia. Forest Ecology and Management 258:978–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MURPHY, P. G. & LUGO, A. E. 1986a. Ecology of tropical dry forest. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17:67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MURPHY, P. G. & LUGO, A. E. 1986b. Structure and biomass of a subtropical dry forest in Puerto Rico. Biotropica 18:89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MWAVU, E. N. & WITKOWSKI, E. T. F. 2008. Sprouting of woody species following cutting and tree-fall in a lowland semi-deciduous tropical rainforest, North-Western Uganda. Forest Ecology and Management 255:982–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NEKE, K. S., OWEN-SMITH, N. & WITKOWSKI, E. T. F. 2006. Comparative resprouting response of Savanna woody plant species following harvesting: the value of persistence. Forest Ecology and Management 232:114–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PACIOREK, C. J., CONDIT, R., HUBBELL, S. P. & FOSTER, R. B. 2000. The demographics of resprouting in tree and shrub species of a moist tropical forest. Journal of Ecology 88:765–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PAYNE, R. 2008. A guide to regression, nonlinear and generalized linear models in GenStat. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead. 101 pp.Google Scholar
PAYNE, R. W., BAIRD, D. B., CHERRY, M., GILMOUR, A. R., HARDINGS, S. A., KANE, A. F., LANE, P. W., MURRAY, D. A., SOUTAR, D. M., THOMPSON, R., TODD, A. D., TUNNICLIFFE WILSON, G., WEBSTER, R. & WELHAM, S. J. 2003. The guide to GenStat release 7.1 Part 2: Statistics. VSN International, Oxford. 924 pp.Google Scholar
SANDS, B. A. & ABRAMS, M. D. 2009. Effects of stump diameter on sprout number and size for three oak species in a Pennsylvania clearcut. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 26:122–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TANNER, E. V. J. & BELLINGHAM, P. J. 2006. Less diverse forest is more resistant to hurricane disturbance: evidence from montane rain forests in Jamaica. Journal of Ecology 94:1003–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VAN BLOEM, S. J., MURPHY, P. G. & LUGO, A. E. 2003. Subtropical dry forest trees with no apparent damage sprout following a hurricane. Tropical Ecology 44:137–145.Google Scholar
VAN BLOEM, S. J., MURPHY, P. G. & LUGO, A. E. 2007. A link between hurricane-induced tree sprouting, high stem density and short canopy in tropical dry forest. Tree Physiology 27:475–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VANDERMEER, J., BOUCHER, D., PERFECTO, I. & DE LA CERDA, I. G. 1996. A theory of disturbance and species diversity: evidence from Nicaragua after Hurricane Joan. Biotropica 28:600–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VIEIRA, D. L. M. & SCARIOT, A. 2006. Principles of natural regeneration of tropical dry forests for restoration. Restoration Ecology 14:11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WEIGEL, D. R. & PENG, C. Y. J. 2002. Predicting stump sprouting and competitive success of five oak species in southern Indiana. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32:703–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar