Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:14:13.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of methods for determining soil water availability in two sites in Panama with similar rainfall but distinct tree communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2005

Thomas A. Kursar
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0840, USA
Bettina M. J. Engelbrecht
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Unit 0948, APO AA 34002-0948, USA
Melvin T. Tyree
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Unit 0948, APO AA 34002-0948, USA USDA Forest Service, P.O. Box 968, Burlington VT 05402, USA

Abstract

Plant productivity, distribution and diversity in tropical rain forests correlate with water availability. Water availability is determined by rainfall and also by the available water capacity of the soil. However, while rainfall is recognized as important, linkages between plant distribution and differences among soils in available water capacity have not been demonstrated. One reason for this may be that measurements of soil moisture, such as gravimetric water content, may be overly simplistic. To investigate this, we compared two sites in Panama, Allee and Rio Paja, which have similar rainfall but different plant communities. Soil water release curves were obtained from about −0.1 MPa to −9 MPa, permitting us to calculate available water capacity. The Rio Paja site had 17% greater available water capacity (between −0.1 MPa to −3 MPa), whereas the gravimetric water content at Rio Paja was lower by 16% in rainy season and by 41% at the end of the dry season. Hence soil gravimetric water content and soil available water capacity did not correspond. The results suggest that available water capacity may better predict plant distributions. Hence, whenever possible, available water capacity should be determined in addition to gravimetric water content.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)