Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:37:31.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ant nests and soil nutrient availability: the negative impact of fire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

Leandro Sousa-Souto ,
José H. Schoereder ,
Carlos Ernesto G. R. Schaefer  and
Washington L. Silva
Leandro Sousa-Souto*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Brazil, 36570-000
José H. Schoereder
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Brazil, 36570-000
Carlos Ernesto G. R. Schaefer
Affiliation:
Departamento de Solos, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Brazil, 36570-000
Washington L. Silva
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia de Comunidades, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Brazil, 36570-000
*
1Corresponding author. Present address: Departamento de Biologia, Laboratório de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Brazil, 49100–000. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

High-nutrient patches are important for regulating the structure and physiognomy of dystrophic habitats. Leaf-cutting ants create these rich patches in many neotropical habitats. Burning, however, could diminish or even annul the effects of ant nests on soil properties. To test this hypothesis, we compared the nutrient concentrations at various depths in soil samples near three nests of the leaf-cutting ant Atta laevigata and three non-nest soils, located in 10-ha plots subjected to burning or with fire-protection within a Brazilian cerrado. Root density in ant-nest soil was greater than in non-nest soil in both unburned and burned plots. Besides, the concentration of Ca, Mg, K and P increased 2–50-fold in ant nests from the unburned area compared to non-nest soils. In contrast, nutrient concentrations and pH in burned ant nests were similar to or lower than non-nest soils, but the nests maintained higher values of organic matter and cation exchange capacity. The positive effect of leaf-cutting ant nests as high-nutrient patches may be strongly reduced in habitats with frequent burning. In this case, the negative effects of leaf-cutter herbivory on a plant community could surpass the benefits of local nutrient enrichment by their nests.

Resumo: Sauveiros modificam as propriedades físicas e químicas do solo, alterando a estrutura e fisionomia local. Entretanto, queimadas podem reduzir os efeitos dos formigueiros nesses ambientes como, por exemplo, pela diminuição do forrageamento das formigas e, conseqüentemente, pela baixa incorporação de material orgânico ao solo. Este estudo testou o efeito do fogo sobre a concentração de nutrientes no solo de colônias de Atta laevigata em área de cerrado. A densidade de raízes foi maior nas colônias do que áreas controle, independentemente da presença do fogo. Na ausência de queimadas, as concentrações de nutrientes foram até 50 vezes superiores nos sauveiros. Contudo, queimadas reduzem a concentração de nutrientes e pH nas colônias. Possivelmente, essa baixa concentração seja atribuída à maior demanda pela vegetação remanescente, em resposta à perturbação provocada pelo fogo. Nesse caso, os efeitos negativos da herbivoria podem superar os benefícios causados por meio da disponibilização de nutrientes pelos sauveiros.

Keywords

Atta laevigataleaf-cutting antsroot densitysavannasoil organic matter
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 24 , Issue 6 , November 2008 , pp. 639 - 646
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ANDRADE, F. V., MENDONÇA, E. S., ALVAREZV., V. H. V., V. H. & NOVAIS, R. F. 2003. Adição de ácidos orgânicos e húmicos em latossolos e adsorção de fosfato. Revista Brasileira de Ciências do Solo 27:1003–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ARAÚJO, M. S., DELLA LUCIA, T. M. C. & MAYHÉ-NUNES, A. J. 1997. Levantamento de Attini (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) em povoamento de Eucalyptus na região de Paraopeba, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 14:323–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ARAÚJO, M. S., DELLA LUCIA, T. M. C. & PICANÇO, M. C. 2004. Impacto da queima da palhada da cana-de-açúcar no ritmo diário de forrageamento de Atta bisphaerica Forel (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 21:33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BATMANIAN, G. J. & HARIDASAN, M. 1985. Primary production and accumulation of nutrients by the ground layer community of cerrado vegetation of central Brazil. Plant and Soil 88:437–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHERRETT, J. M. 1989. Leaf-cutting ants. Pp. 473–488 in Lieth, H. & Werger, M. J. A. (eds.). Tropical rain forest ecosystems: biogeographical and ecological studies. Elsevier, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COUTINHO, L. M. 1978. O conceito de cerrado. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 1:17–23.Google Scholar
COUTINHO, L. M. 1984. Aspectos ecológicos da saúva no cerrado. A saúva, as queimadas e sua possível relação na ciclagem de nutrientes minerais. Boletim de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo 8: 1–9.Google Scholar
CRAWLEY, M. J. 2002. Statistical computing: an introduction to data analysis using S-Plus. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. 761 pp.Google Scholar
DOSTÁL, P., BREZNOVÁ, M., KOZLICKOVÁ, V., HERBEN, T. & KOVÁR, P. 2005. Ant-induced soil modification and its effect on plant below-ground biomass. Pedobiologia 49: 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EITEN, G. 1972. The cerrado vegetation of Brazil. Botanical Review 38:201–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EMBRAPA (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária) 1997. Manual de métodos de análise de solo. 2 ed. CNPS, Rio de Janeiro. 212 pp.Google Scholar
EMBRAPA (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária) 1999. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. CNPS, Brasília. 412 pp.Google Scholar
FARJI-BRENER, A. G. & ILLES, A. E. 2000. Do leaf-cutting ant nests make “bottom-up” gaps in neotropical rain forests? A critical review of the evidence. Ecology Letters 3:219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FARJI-BRENER, A. G. & MEDINA, C. 2000. The importance of where to dump the refuse: seed banks and fine roots in nests of the leaf-cutting ants Atta cephalotes and Atta colombica. Biotropica 31:120–126.Google Scholar
FARJI-BRENER, A. G. & SILVA, J. 1995. Leaf-cutting ants and forest groves in a tropical parkland savanna of Venezuela: facilitated succession? Journal of Tropical Ecology 11:651–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GARRETTSON, M., STETZEL, J. F., HALPERN, B. S., HEARN, D. J., LUCEY, B. T. & MCKONE, M. J. 1998. Diversity and abundance of understory plants on active and abandoned nests of leaf-cutting ants (Atta cephalotes) in a Costa Rican rain forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 14:17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HAINES, B. 1978. Element and energy flows through colonies of the leaf-cutting ant, Atta colombica, in Panama. Biotropica 10:270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LOBRY DE BRUYN, L. A. & CONACHER, A. J. 1990. The role of termites and ants in soil modification: a review. Australian Journal of Soil Research 28:55–93.Google Scholar
LUGO, A., FARNWORTH, E., POOL, D., JEREZ, P. & KAUFMAN, G. 1973. The impact of the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica on the energy flow of a tropical wet forest. Ecology 54:1292–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MIRANDA, A. C., MIRANDA, H. S., DIAS, I. F. O. & DIAS, B. F. S. 1993. Soil and air temperatures during prescribed cerrado fires in Central Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology 9:313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MOREIRA, A. G. 2000. Effects of fire protection on savanna structure in Central Brazil. Journal of Biogeography 27:1021–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MOUTINHO, P., NEPSTAD, D. C. & DAVIDSON, E. A. 2003. Influence of leaf-cutting ant nests on secondary forest growth and soil properties in Amazônia. Ecology 84:1265–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RAO, M. 2000. Variation in leaf-cutter ant (Atta sp.) densities in forest isolates: the potential role of predation. Journal of Tropical Ecology 16:209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHOEREDER, J. H. & COUTINHO, L. M. 1990. Fauna e estudo zoossociológico das espécies de saúvas (Formicidae, Attini) em duas regiões de cerrado do estado de São Paulo. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 35:229–236.Google Scholar
SOUSA-SOUTO, L., SCHOEREDER, J. H & SCHAEFER, C. E. 2007. Leaf-cutting ants, seasonal burning and nutrient distribution in Cerrado vegetation. Austral Ecology 32:758–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STERNBERG, L. S. L., PINZON, M.C., MOREIRA, M. Z., MOUTINHO, P., ROJAS, E. I & HERRE, E. A. 2007. Plants use macronutrients accumulated in leaf-cutting ant nests. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 274:315–321.Google Scholar
VAN DE VIJVER, C. A. D. M., POOT, P. & PRINS, H. H. T. 1999. Causes of increased nutrient concentrations in post-fire regrowth in an East African savanna. Plant and Soil 214:173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VASCONCELOS, H. & CHERRETT, J. M. 1995. Changes in leaf-cutting ant populations (Formicidae, Attini) after the clearing of mature forest in Brazilian Amazonia. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 30:107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VERCHOT, L. V., MOUTINHO, P. R. & DAVIDSON, E. A. 2003. Leaf-cutting ant (Atta sexdens) and nutrient cycling: deep soil inorganic nitrogen stocks, mineralization, and nitrification in Eastern Amazonia. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 35:1219–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WAGNER, D., JONES, J. B. & GORDON, D. M. 2004. Development of harvester ant colonies alters soil chemistry. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36:797–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WIRTH, R., MEYER, S. T., ALMEIDA, W. R., ARAUJO, M. V., BARBOSA, V. S. & LEAL, I. R. 2007. Increasing densities of leaf-cutting ants (Atta spp.) with proximity to the edge in a Brazilian Atlantic forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 23:501–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WOOD, T. G. & SANDS, W. A. 1978. The role of termites in ecosystems. Pp. 245–292 in Brian, M. V. (ed.). Production ecology of ants and termites. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar