Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T16:37:16.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Activity pattern of Atlantic Forest small arboreal mammals as revealed by camera traps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2008

Luiz Gustavo R. Oliveira-Santos ,
Marcos A. Tortato  and
Maurício E. Graipel
Luiz Gustavo R. Oliveira-Santos*
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Conservação, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil
Marcos A. Tortato
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Conservação, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Brazil
Maurício E. Graipel
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia e Zoologia, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil
*
1Corresponding author, at Vila Ipiranga, Campo Grande MS, Brazil. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Even though the great majority of the biomass and diversity of mammals in tropical forests inhabit the canopy (Eisenberg & Thorington 1973), most knowledge of this group is based on forest-floor samples (Lowman & Moffett 1993). Studies that include trapping efforts in the canopy are becoming increasingly common (Grelle 2003, Lambert et al. 2005, Malcolm 1995, Patton et al. 2000, Vieira & Monteiro-Filho 2003, Voss et al. 2001), but aspects on the ecology of arboreal small mammals still remain poorly understood. Many species of non-flying mammals co-occur in the canopy and, thus, are expected to use niche dimensions differently to permit coexistence (Cameron et al. 1979). Despite the difficulties of access to and in understanding the three-dimensional use of the arboreal strata by the different species (Emmons 1995), some studies have demonstrated that the differential use of the habitat (Cunha & Vieira 2002, Gentile & Fernandez 1999), of food items (Cáceres et al. 2002, Santori et al. 1995) or both (Leite et al. 1996, Mauffrey & Catzeflis 2003), include strategies involved in the division of resources.

Keywords

arborealcanopyDidelphis albiventrisJuliomys pictitesmarsupialMicoureus paraguayanusnicherodentscansorial
Type
Short Communication
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 24 , Issue 5 , September 2008 , pp. 563 - 567
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ASCHOFF, J. 1966. Circadian activity pattern with two peaks. Ecology 47:657–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BRUSEO, J. A. & BARRY, R. E. 1995. Temporal activity of syntopic Peromyscus in the Central Appalachians. Journal of Mammalogy 76:79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CÁCERES, N. C. & MONTEIRO-FILHO, E. L. A. 2001. Food habits, home range and activity of Didelphis aurita (Mammalia, Marsupialia) in a forest fragment of Southern Brazil. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 36:85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CÁCERES, N. C., GHIZONI-JÚNIOR, I. R. & GRAIPEL, M. E. 2002. Diet of two marsupials, Lutreolina crassicaudata and Micoureus demerarae, in a coastal Atlantic Forest island of Brazil. Mammalia 66:331–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CAMERON, G. N., KINCAID, W. B. & CARNES, B. A. 1979. Experimental species removal: temporal activity patterns of Sigmodon hispidus and Reithrodontomys fulvescens. Journal of Mammalogy 60:195–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CUNHA, A. A. & VIEIRA, M. V. 2002. Support diameter, incline, and vertical movements of four didelphid marsupials in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Journal of Zoology 258:419–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DAAN, S. 1981. Adaptive daily strategies in behavior. Pp. 275–296 in Aschoff, J. (ed.). Handbook of behavioral neurobiology – biological rhythms. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
DELCIELLOS, A. C. & VIEIRA, M. V. 2006. Arboreal walking performance in seven didelphid marsupials as an aspect of their fundamental niche. Austral Ecology 31:449–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DELCIELLOS, A. C., LORETTO, D. & VIEIRA, M. V. 2006. Novos métodos no estudo da estratificação vertical de marsupiais neotropicais. Oecologia Brasiliensis 10:135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EISENBERG, J. F. & THORINGTON, R. 1973. A preliminary analysis of a neotropical mammal fauna. Biotropica 5:150–161.Google Scholar
EMMONS, L. H. 1995. Mammals of rain forests. Pp. 199–223 in Lowman, M. D. (ed.). Forests canopies. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
EMMONS, L. H. 1997. Neotropical rainforest mammals: a field guide. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 298 pp.Google Scholar
FONSECA, G. A. B., HERRMANN, G., LEITE, Y. L. R., MITTERMEIER, R. A., RYLANDS, A. B. & PATTON, J. L. 1996. Lista anotada dos mamíferos do Brasil. Occasional Papers in Conservation Biology 4:1–38.Google Scholar
GENTILE, R. & FERNANDEZ, F. A. S. 1999. Influence of habitat structure on a streamside small mammal community in a Brazilian rural area. Mammalia 63:29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GÓMEZ, H., WALLACE, R. B., AYALA, G. & TEJADA, R. 2005. Dry season activity periods of some Amazonian mammals. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environmental 40:91–95.Google Scholar
GRAIPEL, M. E., MILLER, P. R. M. & GLOCK, L. 2003. Padrão de atividade de Akodon montensis e Oryzomys russatus na Reserva Volta Velha, Santa Catarina, sul do Brasil. Mastozoologia neotropical 10;255–260.Google Scholar
GRELLE, C. E. V. 2003. Forest structure and vertical stratification of small mammal populations in a secondary forest, southeastern Brazil. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environmental 38:81–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HIRAKAWA, H. 2005. Luring bats to the camera – a new technique for bats survey. Mammal Study 30:69–71.Google Scholar
KARANTH, K. U. & NICHOLS, J. D. 1998. Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79:2852–2862.Google Scholar
KLEIN, R. M. 1981. Fisionomia, importância e recursos da vegetação do Parque Estadual da Serra do Tabuleiro. Sellowia 33:5–54.Google Scholar
LAMBERT, T. D., MALCOLM, J. R. & ZIMMERMAN, B. L. 2005. Variation in small mammal species richness by trap height and trap type in southeastern Amazonia. Journal of Mammalogy 86:982–990.Google Scholar
LEITE, Y. L. R., COSTA, L. P. & STALLINGS, J. R. 1996. Diet and vertical space use of three sympatric opossums in a Brazilian Atlantic Forest Reserve. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12:435–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LOWMAN, M. D. & MOFFETT, M. W. 1993. The ecology of tropical rain forest canopies. Trees 8:104–107.Google ScholarPubMed
MALCOLM, J. R. 1995. Forest structure and the abundance and diversity of Neotropical small mammals. Pp. 179–197 in Lowman, M. D. (ed.). Forests canopies. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
MAUFFREY, J. F. & CATZEFLIS, F. 2003. Ecological and isotopic discrimination of syntopic rodents in a neotropical rain forest of French Guiana. Journal of Tropical Ecology 19:209–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MCMANUS, J. J. 1971. Activity of captive Didelphis marsupialis. Journal of Mammalogy 52:846–848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MORAES-JÚNIOR, E. A. & CHIARELLO, A. G. 2005. Sleeping sites of woolly mouse opossum Micoureus demerarae Thomas (1905) (Didelphimorphia: Didelphidae) in the Atlantic forest of south-eastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 22:839–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OLMOS, F. 1991. Observations on the behavior and population dynamics of some Brazilian Atlantic Forest rodents. Mammalia 55:555–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OTANI, T. 2001. Measuring fig foraging of the Yakushima macaque by using automatic cameras. Ecological Research 16:49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PATTON, J. L., DA SILVA, M. N. F. & MALCOLM, J. R. 2000. Mammals of the Rio Juruá: evolutionary and ecological diversification within Amazonia. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 244:1–306.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROSSI, R. V., BIANCONI, G. V. & PEDRO, W. A. 2006. Ordem Didelphimorphia. Pp. 25–64 in Reis, N. R., Peracchi, A. L., Pedro, W. A. & Lima, I. P. (eds.). Mamíferos do Brasil. Editora da UEL, Londrina.Google Scholar
SANTORI, R. T., ASTUA DEMORAES, D. & CERQUEIRA, R. 1995. Diet composition of Metachirus nudicaudatus and Didelphis aurita (Marsupialia, Didelphoidea) in southeastern Brazil. Mammalia 59:511–516.Google Scholar
SCHOENER, T. W. 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185:27–39.Google Scholar
VAN SCHAIK, C. P. & GRIFFITHS, M. 1996. Activity periods of Indonesian rain forest mammals. Biotropica 28;105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VIEIRA, E. M. 2006. Padrões de uso vertical do habitat por marsupiais brasileiros. Pp. 217–228 in Cáceres, N. C. & Monteiro–Filho, E. L. A. (eds.). Os marsupiais do Brasil: biologia, ecologia e evolução. Editora UFMS, Campo Grande.Google Scholar
VIEIRA, E. M. & MONTEIRO-FILHO, E. L. A. 2003. Vertical stratification of small mammals in the Atlantic rain forest of south-eastern Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology 19:501–507.Google Scholar
VOSS, R. S., LUNDE, D. P. & SIMMONS, N. B. 2001. The mammals of Paracou, French Guiana: a Neotropical lowland fauna. Part 2. Nonvolant species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 263:1–236.Google Scholar
ZAR, J. H. 1996. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. 662 pp.Google Scholar