Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:56:21.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Universal Life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2014

R. D. Weatherhead
Get access

Extract

The purpose of this paper is to document some recent developments in unit linked life assurance and in particular Universal Life policies, highlighting some areas of current controversy and some potential problems.

Some of the reasons for the current design of Universal Life products are given in §2. Section 3 contains a detailed description of the operation of the policy and §4 describes briefly the benefits and options available. The methods used to make charges for expenses, commissions, benefits and profit are described in § 5 and some of the problems involved in deciding the levels of charges for benefits are discussed in § 6. Section 7 discusses the profit objective of the office and §8 highlights some aspects of valuation which are peculiar to Universal Life. Future developments and some speculation about the effect these will have on the Universal Life product are discussed in § 9 and a brief summary containing the major conclusions of the paper is given in § 10.

I would like to extend my sincere thanks to all those who gave advice and comments on the paper and to Andrea Hills for typing it.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Staple Inn Actuarial Society , Volume 32 , March 1990 , pp. 1 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Staple Inn Actuarial Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Anderson, J. C. H. (1959) ‘Gross Premium Calculations and Profit Measurement for Non-Participating Insurance’. T.S.A., 11, 357.Google Scholar
(2) Brown, A. S., Ford, A., Seymour, P. A. C., Squires, R. J. and Wales, F. R. (1978) ‘Valuation of Individual Investment-Linked Policies.’ J.I.A., 105, 317.Google Scholar
(3) Iqbal, M. (1981) ‘Actuarial Managment of a Unit-Linked Office’. Paper presented to the Institute of Actuaries Students' Society on 6 January 1981. Synopsis in J.S.S., 25, 202.Google Scholar
(4) North, M. R. T. and Savill, R. J. (1985) ‘Rider Benefits and Options on Life Assurance Contracts’. Paper presented to the Institute of Actuaries Students' Society on 2 April 1985.Google Scholar
Synopsis in J.S.S., 29, 158.Google Scholar
(5) Report of the Maturity Guarantees Working Party (1980) J.I.A., 107, 103.Google Scholar
(6) Sanders, A. J. and Silby, N. F. (1986) ‘Actuarial Aspects of PHI in the UK’. J.S.S., 31, 1.Google Scholar
(7) Sheraton, D. (1984) ‘Recent Developments in Unit-Linked Whole Life Policies’. J.S.S., 27, 105.Google Scholar
(8) Smart, I. C. (1977) ‘Pricing and Profitability in a Life Office’. J.I.A., 104, 125.Google Scholar
(9) Wilkie, A. D. (1985) ‘Universal or Variable Linked Life Assurances and Life Annuities.’ J.I.A., 112, 221.Google Scholar