Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:47:27.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Do Actuaries need Standards?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2014

Get access

Extract

It is a great honour for an accountant to be invited to deliver the Students' Society 1984 Jubilee Lecture. When the Financial Times defined an actuary as “someone who found accountancy too exciting”, I realized that accountancy might be a suitable subject for this Jubilee Lecture.

I note that the Institute of Accountants and Actuaries in Glasgow played a pioneering role in the evolution of the accountancy profession in Scotland during the latter half of the last century.

So the paths of the actuarial and accountancy professions have met, and indeed crossed, on a number of issues, and we have a great deal in common, most of all perhaps a belief in the power of presenting an argument through numbers. Like you, we have members in practice and in commercial employment, we form professional opinions which we express in reports and we are concerned with problems of measurement; also we each have our own procedures, assumptions, jargon and rules, all of which are confusing to the uninitiated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Institute of Actuaries Students' Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Financial Times, 8 November 1983.Google Scholar
(2) A fuller account of these events and the text of Professor Stamp's article are given in Stamp, E. and Marley, C. (1970) Accounting Principles and the City Code: The Case for Reform. Butterworths.Google Scholar
(3) Reproduced in ICAEW (1982) ‘Accounting standards 1982’ p. 20.Google Scholar
(4) Accounting Standards Committee (1971) ‘Explanatory foreword to SSAPs’ paragraph 8.Google Scholar
(5) Accounting Standards Committee (1983) ‘Review of the standard setting process’ paragraph 3.5.Google Scholar
(6) Accounting Standards Committee (1971), op. cit., paragraph 10.Google Scholar
(7) See Hoffman, L. and Arden, M. H. (1983) ‘Legal opinion on “true and fair”’ reproduced in Accountancy, November 1983.Google Scholar
(8) Gower, L. C. B. (1984) ‘Review of Investor Protection’ Cmnd. 9125. HMSO, paragraph 6.40.Google Scholar
(9) DHSS (1984) ‘Greater security for the rights and expectations of members of occupational pension schemes’ paragraph 24.Google Scholar
(10) Accounting Standards Committee (1982) ‘Pension scheme accounts: a discussion paper’.Google Scholar
(11) Accounting Standards Committee (1984) ED 34 ‘Pension scheme accounts’ (ASC, 1984).Google Scholar
(12) Accounting Standards Committee (1983) ‘Review of the standard setting process’ paragraph 3.8.Google Scholar
(13) Accounting Standards Committee (1983) ‘Review of the standard setting process’ paragraph 5.2.Google Scholar
(14) Accounting Standards Committee (1984), op. cit., paragraph 5.Google Scholar
(15) Accounting Standards Committee (1984), op. cit. paragraph 31.Google Scholar
(16) Pensions Research Accountants Group (1981) ‘Valuing insurance policies for accounts purposesPRAG/NAPF.Google Scholar
(17) Accounting Standards Committee (1983) ED 32 ‘Disclosure of pension information in company accounts’.Google Scholar