Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T20:17:58.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Demography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2014

Elfryn Jones
Get access

Extract

The study of methods of measurement of the rate of population growth is one of the most fundamental aspects of demographic science and one which, from its nature, should be of particular interest to the actuarial profession. It is therefore fitting that this paper should be devoted to a discussion of this side of the subject, particularly in view of the importance which the analysis of population trends has assumed in modern times as the result of the decline in birth-rates experienced by this country in common with most of the leading civilized nations.

Leaving out of account losses and gains by migration, the future development of a given population is determined by the numbers of children that people have, the proportions of these who survive and the sizes of the families which they have in their turn, the cycle continuing indefinitely. Whilst the consequences of changes in mortality must not be underestimated it is clearly the wide possible range of variation in birth-rates which plays by far the more important part in shaping future population trends. The measurement of population growth therefore rests largely on the analysis of fertility, a subject of considerable complexity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Staple Inn Actuarial Society , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , November 1949 , pp. 121 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © Institute of Actuaries Students' Society 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Sharpe, F. R. & Lotka, A. J. (1911). A problem in age distribution. Phil. Mag. (6), Vol. XXI, p. 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2) Lotka, A. J. (1938). Some recent results in population analysis. J. Amer. Statist. Ass. Vol. XXXIII, p. 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3) Dublin, L. I. & Lotka, A. J. (1925). On the true rate of natural increase (mathematical appendix by Lotka). J. Amer. Statist. Ass. Vol. XX, p. 305.Google Scholar
(4) Wicksell, S. D. (1931). Nuptiality, fertility and reproductivity. Skandinavisk Aktuarietidskrift, p. 125.Google Scholar
(5) Rich, C. D. (1934). The measurement of the rate of population growth. J.I.A. Vol. LXV, p. 38.Google Scholar
(6) Karmel, P. H. (1948). An analysis of the sources and magnitudes of inconsistences between male and female net reproduction rates in actual populations. Population Studies, Vol. II, no. 2, p. 240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7) Myers, R. J. (1941). The validity and significance of male net reproduction rates. J. Amer. Statist. Ass. Vol. XXXVI, p. 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8) Pollard, A. H. (1948). The measurement of reproductivity. J.I.A. Vol. LXXIV, p. 288.Google Scholar
(9) Hajnal, J. (1947). The analysis of birth statistics in the light of the international recovery of the birth-rate. Population Studies, Vol. I, no. 2, p. 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10) Jones, E. (1948). The application of the service-table technique to staffing problems. J.S.S. Vol. VIII, p. 49.Google Scholar
(11) Cox, P. R. (1948). Some general remarks upon the statistical investigation of British fertility data. Institute of Actuaries Centenary Assembly paper.Google Scholar