Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T19:56:47.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anglo-American economic relation A rejoinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2014

Get access

Extract

Mr A. F. Murray's paper published in the July issue of this Journal covers such a wide and complex field that it is obviously impossible to discuss it adequately in three to four pages. Within this limited space I have selected for comment a few points which not only constitute the main props in Mr Murray's arguments, but are also, largely for accidental reasons, of rather special interest. Their interest derives from the fact that in the last article written by the regretted Lord Keynes, these points are discussed in great detail and—most important—entirely different conclusions are reached.

If I understand him rightly Mr Murray's argument is roughly this. Multilateral international trade can function properly only if the following two conditions are satisfied:

(i) each of the participating nations must pursue a policy of full employment at home;

(ii) each nation must pursue abroad an economic policy such that its balance of payments over a long term is of manageable dimensions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Institute of Actuaries Students' Society 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Von Haberler, G. (1936). The Theory of International Trade. London.Google Scholar
2. Keynes, J. M. (1946). The Balance of Payments of the United States. Economic Journal, Vol. LVI, no. 222.Google Scholar
3. Robinson, Joan (1936). Essays in-the Theory of Employment. London.Google Scholar
4. Robinson, Joan (1937). Introduction to the Theory of Employment. London.Google Scholar
5. Robinson, Joan (1943). The International Currency Proposals. Economic Journal, Vol. LIII, nos. 210–11.Google Scholar