Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:02:33.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘The Pillars of State:’ Some Notes on the Qarachu Begs and the Kešikten in the Īl-Khānate (1256-1335)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2017

MICHAEL HOPE
MICHAEL HOPE*
Affiliation:
Yonsei [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

By the beginning of the fourteenth century the court histories of the Īl-Khānate had begun to lament that ‘qarachu’ (non-royal) commanders dominated the realm. The same histories report that these qarachu were drawn from the families of the khans’ royal guardsmen (kešik). The fact that these kešik families had come to eclipse, and in some cases threaten, the power of their Chinggisid patrons suggests a much broader transformation of the Īl-Khān polity from the patrimonial government of the khan's household, which characterised the early Mongol Empire, to a quasi-feudal state, dominated by a powerful military aristocracy. The present study will elucidate how this new aristocracy supported their authority through the hereditary transmission of armies, property and, offices, which entrenched their position at the summit of Īl-Khān polity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , April 2017 , pp. 181 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 On the qarachu begs of the Crimean Khanate see Schamiloglu, U., ‘The Qaraçi Beys of the Later Golden Horde: Notes on the Organisation of the Mongol World Empire,’ Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi (No. 4, 1984), pp. 283–297 Google Scholar; Inalcık, H., ‘The Khan and the Tribal Aristocracy: The Crimean Khanate under Sahib Girey I,’ Harvard Ukrainian Studies (Vol. 3/4, Part 1, 1979–80), pp. 445–466Google Scholar; Manz, B. Forbes, ‘The Clans of the Crimean Khanate, 1466-1532,’ Harvard Ukrainian Studies (Vol. 2, No. 3, Sept. 1978), pp. 282–309 Google Scholar; Fisher, A., The Crimean Tatars (Stanford, 1978), pp. 23–29 Google Scholar.

2 Schamiloglu, U., Tribal Politics and Social Organization in the Golden Horde (PhD Dissertation: University of Chicago, August 2007)Google Scholar; Schamiloglu, ‘The Qaraçi Beys of the Later Golden Horde’, pp. 283-297.

3 Schamiloglu, Tribal Politics and Social Organization in the Golden Horde, p. 5.

4 Atwood, C., ‘ Ulus Emirs, Keshig Elders, Signatures, and Marriage Partners: The Evolution of a Classic Mongol Institution,’ Imperial Statecraft: Political Forms and Techniques of Governance in Inner Asia, Sixth-Twentieth Centuries, (ed.) Sneath, D. (Bellington WA, 2006), pp. 141–174 Google Scholar.

5 Atwood, p. 158.

6 Schamiloglu, ‘The Qaraçi Beys of the Later Golden Horde’, p. 287.

7 al-‘Umarī, Aḥmad b. Yaḥ b. Faḍl Allāh, Das Mongolische Weltreich: al-‘Umarī’s Darstellung der Mongolischen Reiche in seinem Werk Masālik al-Abṣār fī Mamālīk al-Amṣār, (ed.) Leich, K. (Wiesbaden, 1968) p. 153 Google Scholar.

8 Atwood, pp. 156-157; Melville, C., ‘The Keshig in Iran: The Survival of the Royal Mongol Household,’ Beyond the Legacy of Genghis Khan, (ed.) Komaroff, L. (Leiden, 2006), pp. 135–164 Google Scholar.

9 Shabānkāraʻī, Muḥammad b. ‘Alī b. Muḥammad, Majmaʻ al-Anṣāb, (ed.) Muḥaddith, M. H. (Tehran, Amīr Kabīr, 1363/1984-1985) pp. 273, 296Google Scholar; al-Ahrī, Abū Bakr al-Quṭbī, Ta'rīkh-i Shaikh Uwais (A History of Shaikh Uwais): An Important Source for the History of Ādharbaijān in the Fourteenth Century, translated by J. B. Van Loon (The Hague, 1954) p. 57 Google Scholar.

10 Shabānkāraʻī, p. 270; Aigle, D., Le Fārs Sous La Domination Mongole (XIII-XIVe s): Politique et Fiscalité (Cahiers de Studia Iranica, No. 31: Paris, 2005), pp. 158–159 Google Scholar.

11 Al-Ahrī, p. 48.

12 Melville, C., ‘Wolf or Shepherd? Amir Chupan's Attitude to Government,’ The Court of the Īl-Khāns, 1290-1340, (ed.) Fitzherbert, T. and Raby, J. (Oxford, 1996), pp. 79–93 Google Scholar; Melville, C., The Fall of Amir Chupan and the Decline of the Īl-Khānate, 1327-37: A Decade of Discord in Mongol Iran (Bloomington, 1999)Google Scholar.

13 Qazwīnī, Ḥamd Allāh Mustawfī, Ẓafarnāma, (ed.) Sharīfzādah, M., Vol. 10 (Tehran, 1387/2009), p. 77 Google Scholar.

14 Waṣṣāf-i Ḥaḍrat, ‘Abd Allāh b. Faḍl Allāh, Tahrīr-i Tārīkh-i Waṣṣāf, (ed.) ‘Āyatī, A. M. (Tehran, 1346/1967-1968), p. 275 Google Scholar.

15 Hamadānī, Rashīd al-Dīn Faḍl Allāh, Jāmiʽ al-Tawārīkh, (ed.) Karīmī, B. (Tehran, 1374/1995-1996) pp. 720, 744, 788Google Scholar; Hamadānī, Rashīd al-Dīn Faḍl Allāh, Jamiʻu't-Tawarikh: Compendium of Chronicles, translated by W. M. Thackston (Cambridge, 1998), pp. 502, 518, 548Google Scholar.

16 Vladimirtsov, B. Y., Le Régime Social des Mongols: Le Féodalisme Nomade, Preface by René Grousset, translated by Michel Carsow, (Paris, 1948) pp. 124, 135Google Scholar; E. Endicott-West, ‘Aspects of Liao, Khitan and Yüan, Mongolian Imperial Rule: A Comparative Perspective,’ Rulers From the Steppe. State Formation on the Eurasian Periphery, (ed.) Seaman, G. and Marks, D. (Los Angeles, 1991), p. 207 Google Scholar; Amitai, R., ‘Turko-Mongolian Nomads and the Iqtā’ System in the Islamic Middle-East (ca. 1000-1400 AD), Nomads in the Sedentary World, (ed.) Khazanov, A. M. and Wink, A. (Richmond, 2001), p. 159 Google Scholar.

17 Karīmī, pp. 28-169; Thackston, pp. 37-112.

18 Karīmī, p. 92; Thackson, p. 67.

19 Karīmī, p. 92; Thackson, p. 67.

20 Karīmī, p. 783; Thackston, p. 547.

21 Waṣṣāf, p. 78; Shīrāzī, Quṭb al-Dīn Mahmūd b. Mas’ūd, Akhbār-i Mughūlān dar Anbānih Quṭb, (ed.) Afshār, I. (Qom, 2010) p. 63 Google Scholar.

22 Abrū, Ḥāfiẓ, Dhayl-i Jāmiʽ al-Tawārīkh-i Rashīdī, (ed.) Bayānī, Kh. (Tehran, 1350/1961-1962) p. 144 Google Scholar; Samarqandī, Kamāl al-Dīn ‘Abd al-Razzāq, Maṭlaʻ-i Saʻdayn wa Majmaʻ-i Baḥrayn, (ed.) Navāʻī, ‘A. Ḥ. (Tehran, 1372/1991-1992), pp. 71–72 Google Scholar.

23 See Allsen, T., Mongol Imperialism: The Policies of the Grand Qan Möngke in China, Russia and the Islamic Lands, 1251-1259 (Berkeley, 1987) p. 100 Google Scholar; Allsen, T., ‘Guard and Government in the Reign of the Grand Qan Möngke 1251-59,’ HJAS (Vol. 46, No. 2, Dec. 1986) p. 520 Google Scholar; Melville, ‘The Keshig in Iran,’ p. 162.

24 The Secret History of the Mongols: A Mongolian Epic Chronicle of the Thirteenth Century, translated by I. de Rachewiltz (Leiden, 2004), p. 201; Juwaynī, ‘Alā al-Dīn ‘Aṭā Malik, Genghis Khan: The History of the World-Conqueror, translated by J. A. Boyle, (Manchester, 1997), p. 150 Google Scholar; Grigor of Akanc, ‘History of the Nation of Archers,’ translated by R. P. Blake and R. N. Frye, HJAS (Vol. 12, 1949) pp. 297-303.

25 Karīmī, p. 725; Thackston, p. 506; Ganjakets'i, Kirakos, Kirakos Ganjakets'i’s History of the Armenians, translated by R. Bedrosian (New York, 1986), p. 330 Google Scholar.

26 Karīmī, p. 135; Thackston, p. 95.

27 Juwaynī, p. 625.

28 Karīmī, p. 743; Thackston, p. 518; Shabānkāraʻī, p. 264.

29 Kirakos, p. 320; Karīmī, p. 742; Thackston, p. 517.

30 Karīmī, p. 832; Thackston, p. 581; Mustawfī, Zafarnāma, p. 77.

31 Juwaynī, p. 596.

32 Kirakos, p. 311; Juwaynī, p. 609.

33 Juwaynī, p. 259.

34 This observation was first made by Charles Melville in ‘The Keshig in Iran,’ p. 161.

35 Ayalon, D., ‘Preliminary Remarks on the Mamlūk Military Institution in Islam,’ War, Technology and Society in the Middle East, (ed.) Perry, V. J. & Yapp, M. E. (London, 1975) pp. 49–50 Google Scholar; Humphreys, R. S., ‘The Emergence of the Mamluk Army,’ Studia Islamica (No. 45, 1977) p. 84 Google Scholar; Northrup, L. S., ‘The Baḥrī Mamlūk sultanate, 1250-1390,’ The Cambridge History of Egypt, (ed.) Daly, M. W. (Cambridge, 1998) p. 247 Google Scholar.

36 Levanoni, A., ‘The Mamluks’ Ascent to Power in Egypt,’ Studia Islamica (No. 72, 1990) pp. 123–124 Google Scholar; Ayalon, D., ‘Aspects of the Mamlūk Phenomenon: Ayyūbids, Kurds and Turks,’ Der Islam (Vol. 54, No. 1, Berlin) pp. 17–25 Google Scholar.

37 Atwood, ‘Ulus Emirs, Keshig Elders,’ pp. 151-153.

38 Thomson, R. W., ‘The Historical Compilation of Vardan Arewelcʽi,’ Dumbarton Oaks Papers (Vol. 43, 1989) p. 222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Karīmī, p. 678; Thackston, p. 472; Kirakos, p. 331.

39 Juwaynī, p. 611; Karīmī, p. 679; Thackston, p. 473.

40 Karīmī, p. 742; Thackston, p. 517.

41 Hope, Michael, ‘The Transmission of Charismatic Authority through the Quriltais of the Early Mongol Empire and the Ilkhanate of Iran (1227-1335),’ Mongolian Studies, Vol. 34 (2012), pp. 87–116 Google Scholar.

42 Karīmī, p. 742; Thackston, p. 517.

43 Karīmī, p. 743; Thackston, pp. 517-518.

44 Waṣṣāf, p. 66.

45 Karīmī, p. 788; Thackston, p. 551.

46 Pfeiffer, J., ‘Aḥmad Tegüder's Second Letter to Qalāʽūn (682/1283),’ History and Historiography of Post-Mongol Central Asia and the Middle East: Studies in Honor of John E. Woods, (ed.) Pfeiffer, J. and Quinn, S. A. (Wiesbaden, 2006) p. 180 Google Scholar; Morgan, D., The Mongols (Oxford, 1986) p. 160 Google Scholar; Boyle, J. A., ‘Dynastic and Political History of the Īl-Khāns, Cambridge History of Iran v. 5, The Saljuq and Mongol Periods, (ed.) Boyle, J. A. (New York, 1968), p. 368 Google Scholar.

47 Karīmī, pp. 786-788; Thackston, pp. 549-550; Waṣṣāf, pp. 66-68.

48 Karīmī, pp. 793-795; Thackston, pp. 553-556; Waṣṣāf, pp. 75-76; Hebraeus, Bar, The Chronography of Gregory Abū’l Faraj, the Son of Aaron, the Hebrew Physician Commonly Known as Bar Hebraeus Being the First Part of his Political History of the World, translated by E. A. Wallis Budge (Oxford, 1932) p. 470 Google Scholar; Mustawfī, Ẓafarnāma, p. 112.

49 Shīrāzī, p. 62.

50 Shīrāzī, pp. 62-63; Karīmī, pp. 791, 798-800; Thackston, pp. 556-557, 559; Waṣṣāf, pp. 77-80; Bar Hebraeus, p. 472; Mustawfī, Zafarnama, pp. 125, 135, 142, 147.

51 Karīmī, p. 808; Thackston, p. 563; Qazwīnī, Ḥamd Allāh Mustawfī, Tārīkh-i Guzīdah, (ed.) Navaʽī, ‘A. Ḥ. (Tehran, 1362/1983) p. 595; Waṣṣāf, p. 137Google Scholar.

52 Mustawfī, Tārīkh-i Guzīdah, p. 595.

53 Karīmī, p. 812; Thackston, p. 566; Mustawfī, Tārīkh-i Guzīdah, p. 597.

54 Karīmī, p. 815; Thackston, p. 569; Bar Hebraeus, p. 477.

55 Karīmī, p. 815; Thackston, p. 568.

56 Karīmī, pp. 814-817; Thackston, pp. 568-570; Waṣṣāf, pp. 139-141; Mustawfī, Ẓafarnāma, p. 171.

57 Karīmī, pp. 819-820; Thackston, p. 572; Waṣṣāf, p. 142.

58 Karīmī, p. 851; Thackston, p. 595.

59 Karīmī, pp. 824-825; Thackston, p. 575; Waṣṣāf, pp. 147-148; Orbélian, Stéphannos, Histoire de la Siounie, transklated M. F. Brosset (St. Petersburg, 1864) p. 259 Google Scholar.

60 Histoire de la Géorgie: Depuis l'Antiquité Jusqu'au XIXe Siècle, translated by M. F. Brosset (St. Petersburg, 1849) p. 608; Karīmī, p. 824; Thackston, p. 575; Orbélian, p. 259.

61 Karīmī, p. 825; Thackston, p. 576.

62 Karīmī, p. 826; Thackston, p. 576.

63 Karīmī, p. 857; Thackston, p. 600.

64 Karīmī, p. 830; Thackston, p. 580; Waṣṣāf, p. 158.

65 Karīmī, p. 832; Thackston, pp. 581-582; Waṣṣāf, p. 159.

66 Waṣṣāf, p. 159.

67 Karīmī, p. 815; Thackston, p. 568.

68 Karīmī, p. 837; Thackston, p. 585; Mustawfī, Ẓafarnāma, pp. 219-223; Waṣṣāf, pp. 168-169.

69 Orbelian, p. 260. Elčidai Qushchi was married to one of Abaqa's daughters and was included amongst the faction of Taghachar during his attack on Arghun's officials. Qonchaqbal served in the kešig of Abaqa and his father Abatay commanded a mingan in the army of Hülegü. Dolādai is mentioned by Mustawfī as one of the commanders who was passed from Hülegü to Abaqa upon the former's death in 1265 (Zafarnama, p. 78). He was marginalised during the reign of Aḥmad and joined Arghun's rebellion in 1284.

70 Karīmī, p. 837; Thackston, p. 586; Mustawfī, Ẓafarnāma, pp. 219-223; Waṣṣāf, pp. 168-169.

71 Waṣṣāf, p. 172.

72 Karīmī, p. 886; Thackston, p. 614.

73 Mīrkhwānd, Mīr Muḥammad b. Sayyid Burhān al-Dīn Khwāndshāh, Tārīkh-i Rawḍat al-Ṣafā,’ (ed.) Khān, R. Q., Vol. 6 (Tehran, 1338/1959-1960), p. 376 Google Scholar.

74 Waṣṣāf, p. 172.

75 Karīmī, p. 547; Thackston, p. 524.

76 Karīmī, p. 754; Thackston, p. 525.

77 Harāvī, Sayf al-Dīn Muḥammad b. Yaʽqūb, Tārīkhnāma-yi Harāt, (ed.) Ṭabāṭābaʽī Majd, Gh. R. (Tehran, 1383/2004-2005), p. 349 Google Scholar.

78 Harāvī, pp. 335-338.

79 Juwaynī, p. 590.

80 Karīmī, p. 590; Thackston, pp. 406-407. Thackston suggests that Bābā Kardīdī may in fact be a corruption of ‘Qata Kürin,’ who is mentioned by Juwaynī as one of the treacherous commanders to be executed by Möngke.

81 Akanc, p. 377.

82 al-Manṣūrī, Rukn al-Dīn Baybars, Zubda al-Fikra fī Tārīkh al-Hijra, (ed.) Richards, D. S. (Beirut, 1998/1419), p. 142 Google Scholar.

83 Karīmī, p. 750; Thackston, p. 523.

84 Karīmī, pp. 824 and 837-839; Thackston, pp. 575-576, 585-586.

85 Karīmī, p. 885; Hamadānī, Rashīd al-Dīn Faḍl Allāh, Geschichte Ġāzān-Ḫān's aus dem Ta'rīḫ-i-Mubārak-i-Ġāzānī, ed. Jahn, K. (London, 1940) p. 59 Google Scholar. This section of the Jāmiʽ al-Tawārīkh is omitted from Thackston's translation.

86 Karīmī, p. 917; Thackston, p. 629.

87 Karīmī, p. 917; Thackston, p. 629.

88 Waṣṣāf, pp. 137-138.

89 Waṣṣāf, p. 130.

90 Āqsarāyī, Karīm al-Dīn Maḥmūd, Musāmarat al-Akhbār, (ed.) Turan, O., 2nd Edition (Tehran, 1362/1984)Google Scholar.

91 Waṣṣāf, p. 365.

92 Waṣṣāf, p. 366.

93 Broadbridge, A. F., Kingship and Ideology in the Islamic and Mongol Worlds (New York, 2008), pp. 65–92 Google Scholar; Amitai-Preiss, R., ‘Mongol Imperial Ideology and the Īl-Khānid War Against the Mamluks’, The Mongol Empire and its Legacy, (ed.) Amitai-Preiss, R. and Morgan, D. O. (Leiden, 1999) p. 66 Google Scholar.

94 This rumour was reported by Mustawfī, Tārīkh-i Guzīdah, p. 602; Waṣṣāf, p. 193; Khwāfī, Faṣīḥ al-Dīn Aḥmad, Mujmal-i Faṣīhī, (ed.) Naṣirābādī, S. M. N., Vol. 3 (Tehran, 1386/2008), p. 859 Google Scholar.

95 Jackson, P., ‘Mongol Khans & Religious Allegiance: The Problems Confronting A Minister-Historian in Īl-Khānid Iran’, Iran, no. 47, (2009), p. 116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Karīmī, p. 967; Thackston, p. 665.

96 Karīmī, p. 900; Thackston, p. 619.

97 Karīmī, p. 897; Thackston, p. 620.

98 Karīmī, p. 915; Thackston, p. 628.

99 Naṭanzī, Muʻīn al-Dīn Muḥammad b. Hindūshāh, Muntakhab al-Tawārīkh-i Muʻīnī, (ed.) Aubin, J. (Tehran, 1336/1957-1958) p. 150 Google Scholar.

100 Y. Raḥīmlū, ‘Risālah Fawāʽīd-i Ūljāytū,’ Faṣlnāma-yi Dānishgāh Adabayāt va ‘Ulūm Insānī Tabrīz (No. 106, Summer 1352/1974) p. 144.

101 Āqsarāyī, pp. 245, 315.

102 Nakhjivānī, Muḥammad b. Hindūshāh, Dastūr al-Kātib fī Taʻyīn al-Marātib, (ed.) ‘‘Alīūghlī ‘Alīzādah, A. K. (Moscow, 1964), p.15; al-Ahrī, p. 81Google Scholar.

103 Naṭanzī, p. 113.

104 Manz, p. 282.

105 Al-Ahrī, p. 49.

106 Nikonovskaʻi'a Letopis’ (The Nikonian Chronicle), translated by S. A. Zenkovsky and B. J. Zenkovsky, Vol. 3 (Princeton, 1984-1989) pp. 259, 266-267; Naṭanzī, pp. 85-88; Grousset, R., The Empire of the Steppes: A History of Central Asia, translated by N. Walford (New Brunswick, 1970) pp. 405–409 Google Scholar.

107 Inalcık, pp. 445-446.