^{page 179 note 1} Indicated by (H.). The asterisk preceding the number of a line of the text refers to the corresponding section in Hansen's commentary.

^{page 179 note 2} Cf. Man. wyncyk, Henhing, , Tales (BSOAS., xi, 465 sqq.)Google Scholar, E 29, and my G(rammar of) M(anichean) S(ogdian), § 475. There is hardly enough space for wyn'wcyq.

^{page 179 note 3} Hansen's restoration c'[f]' is not very helpful. c'[s]' stands here beside c's'r, lines 227, 228, as [cy]s' 243 beside cys'r 271.

^{page 179 note 4} Cf. S. t'p- “to seal”, Henning, Tales, H 27.

^{page 179 note 5} Or ywny “at once”.

^{page 180 note 1} Henning's restoration.

^{page 181 note 1} Henning has a reference to Lentz, , ST ii 579cGoogle Scholar, who translated brw in this passage as “magic”.

^{page 181 note 2} κλàδοσ, Krumbacher, loc. cit., p. 10, 2; κλωασ ibid. p. 24, 17. Coptic “budded”, Budge, , Martyrdom, p. 305Google Scholar; but cf. ibid. p. 315, where the widow, referring to this miracle, says “O George …, who didst make the dried up pieces of wood to bear fruit again

^{page 181 note 3} On f alternating with v see GMS., §§ 52 sqq., on the reduction of fra- before s, see § 316. It seems by the way possible that fra- was reduced to f also before b (> v), so that θvar- “to give” may be derived with dissimilation from *fvar- < frabara-. fra- would satisfactorily account for the augment in the imperfect θāαρ- Dissimilation would then have to be assumed also for Khwārezmian hivr-; cf. Henning, , ZDMG., 90, *33*Google Scholar. Khotanese haur- was derived from frabara- by Konow, , NTS., xi, 83Google Scholar.

^{page 182 note 1} The similarity of Uyghur šwk, Müller, F. W. K., Uigurica, p. 6Google Scholar, line 9, “motionless,” may not be accidental, cf. German still.

^{page 183 note 1} Cf. in other context, Syr. “river of fire”, Brooks, loc. cit., p. 106, line 7.