^{page 117 note 1} See p. 118 below, n. 14.

^{page 117 note 2} I do not claim to give an exhaustive list of the places, and have, in fact, omitted a few names for which we have neither a reliable reading nor a photograph or a facsimile. Still less do I aim at giving all the references for them.

^{page 117 note 3} Ind. Ant., vol. 5, p. 16Google Scholar, line 25, = Pāli, Sanskṛit, and Old-Canarese Inscriptions, No. 154, = Epi. Carn., vol. 7 (Shimoga), Sk. 125.Google Scholar

^{page 117 note 4} Ind. Ant., vol. 4, p. 179Google Scholar, line 11–12, = PSOCI, No. 151,= Epi. Carn., vol. 7, Sk. 120.Google Scholar

^{page 117 note 5} Ind. Ant., vol. 10, p. 127Google Scholar, line 11: also PSOCI, No. 159, line 5, = Epi. Carn., vol. 7, Sk. 129.

^{page 117 note 6} PSOCI, No. 138, line 27, = Epi. Carn., vol. 11Google Scholar (Chitaldroog), Dg. 3: also ibid., Dg. 2, line 22–23.

^{page 117 note 7} PSOCI, No. 146, line 24, = Epi. Carn., vol. 11, Cd. 13.Google Scholar

^{page 118 note 1} JBBRAS, vol. 12, p. 12, line 14.Google Scholar

^{page 118 note 2} Epi. Carn., vol. 5 (Hassan), Bl. 116, line 18: and vol. 11, Dg. 36, line 80. The present name Haḷēbiḍ, lit. “old camp,” seems to preserve the memory of the ancient nele-vīḍu. A haḷeya-bīḍu is mentioned for “the capital Hiriya-Bētūr” in Epi. Carn., vol. 11, Dg. 6, line 17–18.

^{page 118 note 3} JBBRAS, vol. 11, p. 228Google Scholar, line 39–40; p. 241, line 34 (the dates of these two records are spurious: for the correct reading of the name and the identification of the place, see Ind. Ant., 1901, p. 262)Google Scholar: also Epi. Carn., vol. 5, Ak. 104, line 17.Google Scholar

^{page 118 note 4} PSOCI, No. 163, line 11, = Epi. Carn., vol. 7, Sk. 124; also PSOCI, No. 164, line 14–15, = Epi. Carn., vol. 7, Sk. 135: for the identification of the place see Ind. Ant., vol. 9, p. 50.Google Scholar

^{page 118 note 5} JBBRAS, vol. 9, p. 297, line 17.Google Scholar

^{page 118 note 6} JBBRAS, vol. 11, p. 247Google Scholar, line 5: also Epi. Carn., vol. 8 (Shimoga)Google Scholar, Sb. 549, line 8; vol. 11, Cd. 33, line 8; Cd. 34, line 5.

^{page 118 note 7} This nele-vīḍu is mentioned in many records: the earliest reference to it is in an unpublished inscription of a.d. 1054 at Kembhāvi, see Epi. Ind., vol. 12, p. 291Google Scholar; for other cases see, e.g., Epi. Ind., vol. 12, p. 283Google Scholar, line 210, and p. 330, line 9; also vol. 5, p. 24, line 10; also PSOCI, No. 175, line 22, = Epi. Carn., vol. 7, Sk. 137.

^{page 118 note 8} Epi. Ind., vol. 4, p. 213Google Scholar, line 11, = Epi. Carn., vol. 11, Mk. 29.

^{page 118 note 9} PSOCI, No. 200, line 50, = Epi. Carn., vol. 7, Sk. 105.

^{page 118 note 10} Ind. Ant., vol. 10, p. 252Google Scholar, line 31; for the correct reading of the name see the Errata.

^{page 118 note 11} Ind. Ant., vol. 19, p. 164Google Scholar, line 4: also PSOCI, No. 155, line 10, = Epi. Carn., vol. 7, Sk. 126: and PSOCI, No. 153, line 9, = Epi. Carn., vol. 7, Sk. 153 (where the name has been misread as Ghaṭṭadakee).

^{page 118 note 12} Ind. Ant., vol. 11, p. 273, line 19.Google Scholar

^{page 118 note 13} PSOCI, No. 146, line 11, = Epi. Carn., vol. 11, Cd. 13; also ibid., Dg. 4, line 14; Dg. 6, line 15.

^{page 118 note 14} From unpublished records: Vaḷavāḍa-sthira-śibirē occurs in Epi. Ind., vol. 3, p. 210Google Scholar, line 15; p. 212, line 11.

^{page 118 note 15} PSOCI, No. 18, plate iv b, line 6,= Epi. Carn., vol. 5, Bl. 71, line 163.

^{page 118 note 16} JBBRAS, vol. 10, p. 268, line 64.Google Scholar