No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
page 121 note 1 Lüders, , Sitzungsberichte d. könig. Preuss. Akademie d. Wissenschaften, xxxviii, p. 830, 07, 1912Google Scholar, merely says the first century of our era, but adds that he is in general agreement with Oldenberg, , “Zur Frage nach der Ära des Kaniska,” NGGW., Phil. Hist. Kl. 1911Google Scholar. Smith, V. A., Early History, 2nd ed., p. 235.Google Scholar
page 121 note 2 JRAS., 1912, p. 678 ff.Google Scholar
page 121 note 3 For Pan Yong v. JRAS., 1912, p. 678, n. 2Google Scholar; ibid., p. 681.
page 121 note 4 JRAS., 1912, p. 129.Google Scholar
page 122 note 1 “The Secret of Kanishka,” Parts II and III, passim, more especially pp. 993–4, 1009–17.
page 121 note 2 Luders, , op. cit., p. 831.Google Scholar
page 121 note 3 JHS., 1902, p. 286.Google Scholar
page 121 note 4 In Parts II and III.
page 124 note 1 For a fuller examination of the question I must refer the reader to “The Secret of Kanishka”, more especially pp. 993–4, 1009 ffGoogle Scholar. (JRAS., 1912).Google Scholar