No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
IT is with regret that I now find it impracticable to accept as authentic a passage in the Haydarābād MS. which had been welcomed there, (1) because being with that good text, it accredited the same passage in Ilminsky's imprint and in the Mémoires de Baber, and (2) because, however ineffectually, it provides something to fill the Bābar-nāma gap of 908 a.h.
page 65 note 1 JRAS., 1907, p. 137, and 1910, p. 882 [H. Beveridge].
page 66 note 1 Pāyanda Ḥasan's Wāqi'āt supplies the verb, and, moreover, so far supports rejection of the Rescue Passage that it agrees verbally with the Elph. MS. (e.g. it reproduces its word hech); this agreement suggests manipulation of the Hāydarabād text for the reception of the Rescue Passage.
page 69 note 1 The last sentence here is an adaptation of Bābar's first of 910 a.h. A surmise of mine as to this sentence (JRAS., 1902, p. 749) is now abandoned.
page 70 note 1 JRAS., 1908, pp. 76 ff.