Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:41:16.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gujarati Phonology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

R. L. Turner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. In India, perhaps as much as in any linguistic area, we are faced with an extensive mixture of dialects from the earliest times. The conditions have seldom been such as make for the evolution of a number of sharply differentiated languages. Constant invasions, the movements of great armies, the attraction of vast crowds of pilgrims from distant parts to centres of religious worship, the far wanderings of innumerable ascetics, the influence on illiterate peoples of travelling bards, the absence in the great plains of the north at least of pronounced natural boundaries, the continual interplay of kingdom with kingdom, a district being now in this political area now in that—these conditions have all made for widespread borrowings in language, the extension of common linguistic changes over large areas and the formation of common mixed languages, of which modern Hindōstānī, spoken and understood in varying degree over the whole of northern and central India, is an excellent example.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , July 1921 , pp. 329 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1921

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 329 note 1 La formation de la langue marathe (quoted below as “Bloch”), pp. 1–37.Google Scholar

page 330 note 1 Bombay Gazetteer, vol. i, pt. i.Google Scholar

page 330 note 2 LSI., vol. ix, pt. iii, p. 324.Google Scholar

page 330 note 3 Ind. Ant., vol. xxiv, p. 74.Google Scholar The traditional text has been largely modernized.

page 330 note 4 Ind. Ant., vol. xliii–xlv.Google Scholar

page 330 note 5 Bloch, , p. 31.Google Scholar

page 331 note 1 LSI., loc. cit., p. 323.Google Scholar

page 331 note 2 Cf. also Bailey, , Himalayan Dialects.Google Scholar

page 331 note 3 Bombay Gaz., vol. i, pt. i, p. 5.Google Scholar

page 332 note 1 Senart, , vol. ii, pp. 330 and 333.Google Scholar

page 332 note 2 Op. cit., p. 5, n. 1.

page 336 note 1 Pischel, , 890, 193Google Scholar, although the author gives a different explanation. Bloch, , p. 105.Google Scholar

page 338 note 1 Ind. Ant., xlviii, pp. 191–4.Google Scholar

page 338 note 2 Pischel, § 59.

page 339 note 1 Wackernagel, , §§ 9, 16, 19, 146, 172, 208.Google Scholar

page 339 note 2 Bloch, § 30.

page 339 note 3 Pischel, § 100.

page 339 note 4 See below, § 15.

page 340 note 1 Pischel, , § 187. Bloch, §§ 54, 55.Google Scholar

page 341 note 1 LSI, loc. cit., p. 329.Google Scholar

page 341 note 2 Wackernagel, , §§ 55, 65.Google Scholar

page 342 note 1 For a fuller account of the being and origin of this accent, see Turner, , JRAS. 04, 1916Google Scholar, §§ 18–43. Cf. also R. G. Bhandarkar, Commemoration Volume, art. Bloch, , “A propos de l'accent d'intensité en indo-aryen,” p. 359.Google Scholar

page 345 note 1 Bloch, § 66 ff.

page 345 note 2 Ind. Ant., xliii, p. 55.Google Scholar

page 346 note 1 Turner, , JRAS., 04, 1916, p. 238.Google Scholar

page 346 note 2 Ind. Ant., xliii, p. 5.Google Scholar

page 348 note 1 Bloch, §§ 13, 31, and literature there quoted.

page 348 note 2 Senart, , ii, p. 330.Google Scholar

page 355 note 1 For change of accent see above, § 15.

page 356 note 1 Senart, , ii, p. 329.Google Scholar

page 357 note 1 Pischel, , § 351–2.Google Scholar

page 358 note 1 Pischel, §§ 166–7.

page 359 note 1 Ind. Ant., xliv, p. 19.Google Scholar

page 361 note 1 Discussed more fully in Sir Asbutosh Mukerji Jubilee Volumes (Orientalia), art. Turner, “e and o vowels in Gujarātī.”

page 362 note 1 Examples in my article quoted above.

page 364 note 1 Macdonell, , Vedic Grammar, § 48a, 1.Google Scholar

page 364 note 2 Pischel, , § 134, 176.Google Scholar

page 364 note 3 LSI ix, 2, p. 331.Google Scholar

page 364 note 4 Pischel, §§ 131–40.

page 365 note 1 Macdonell, op. cit., §21.