^{page 413 note 1} In connexion with this we may point out that the author advances very cogent arguments to show that the famous “Trimūrti” of Elephanta is not a Trimūrti at all, but a Mahēśa-mūrti (see p. 382 ff.).

^{page 414 note 1} This weakness has led our author into a mistake on p. 45, where he speaks of the Śāṅkhāyana and Kaushītaki Brāhmaṇas as two distinct works: as a matter of fact, they are one and the same.