^{page 508 note 1} JRAS. 1925, 293–4.

^{page 508 note 2} Provinzeinteilung des assyrischen Reiches, 64.

^{page 508 note 3} D. G. Hogarth, Penetration of Arabia, 159.

^{page 508 note 4} Asurbanipal, 217 ¹⁰.

^{page 508 note 5} MVAG. 1915, No. 3, 33.

^{page 508 note 6} VAS. i, No. 77, Rev., 22–7; referred to in JRAS. 1925, 294.

^{page 509 note 1} So Luckenbill, Annals of Sennacherib, 89.

^{page 509 note 2} Ashurbanipal, Rassam Prism, vii, 82—viii, 71.

^{page 509 note 3} Cf. Sargon, Annals, 98.

^{page 509 note 4} See Preface, Babylonian Historical Texts.

^{page 509 note 5} The razzia of Khālid with a small force against 'Ukaidir in A.H. 9 from Tabūk was considered a great exploit, see Yāqūt, ii, 626. I owe the reference to Mr. Fulton.

^{page 510 note 1} Verse Account, ii, 21.

^{page 510 note 2} ii, 18–24.

^{page 510 note 3} Nabonidus Chronicle, i, 11.

^{page 510 note 4} Babylonian Historical Texts, 77.

^{page 510 note 5} Euting, Tagbuch, ii, 147.

^{page 510 note 6} A common-place of the Arab geographers.

^{page 511 note 1} First by Dougherty in JAOS. xlii, 305; the article was not known to me in 1924, when writing Babylonian Historical Texts, 81–2.

^{page 511 note 2} JRAS. 1925, 294–5.

^{page 511 note 3} Ibid., 295.

^{page 511 note 4} Cf. [namtaru] puridišu iṣṣabat, Thompson, Campbell, Devils and Evil Spirits, ii, 100, 24, and similar phrases.Google Scholar

^{page 511 note 5} Maqlu, vii, 124 et freq.

^{page 511 note 6} By C. J. Gadd, in Oriental List for April–June, 1924, confirmed by text No. 32, 3, in Clay, Pierpont Morgan Library, vol. iv.

^{page 511 note 7} Huitième Campagne, 58⁶.

^{page 511 note 8} Creation Epic, iv, 49 et freq.

^{page 512 note 1} JRAS. 1925, 295.

^{page 512 note 2} JRAS. 1925, 295.

^{page 512 note 3} The text is well written and accurate; it is possibly the original version and not a copy. See Babylonian Historical Texts, 27.

^{page 512 note 4} Jastrow and Clay, Old Babylonian Gilganesh Epic, pl. vi, 258–9.

^{page 512 note 5} Translated by some as a subordinate clause with conjunction understood; but the preceding -ma precludes this.

^{page 513 note 1} Rassam Prism, vii, 56–7. It is impossible to transliterate innabtamma, since in other passages of the Annals this tu varies with the other form of tu. For this -u see also King, Magic, 30, 13; Driver, Letters, 33, 8.

^{page 513 note 2} See JRAS. 1925, 46, 57; et freq.