Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:41:39.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Art. XXVI.—Tārīkhs or Eastern Chronograms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

C. J. Rodgers
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is well known that every letter in the Persian alphabet has a numerical value. These values are perfectly conventional. They are as follows:—

Type
Original Communications
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , October 1898 , pp. 715 - 739
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1898

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 I see Mr. Stanley Lane Poole, in his “Aurangzeb,” p. 167, gives this tārīkh as which yields but 1091 h. or 1680 a.d. He is right. The tārīkh given in the text is that of the death of Sambhājī, son of Sīvājī. Beale has misprinted Sīvājī for Sambhājī on p. 282.