Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T08:35:54.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Art. XII.—The Gaurian compared with the Romance Languages. Part I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

E. L. Brandreth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

By “Gaurian” are meant what Mr. Beames, in his comparative grammar, has called the “Modern Aryan Languages of India,” but, as this last is too long a title for frequent use, and as the name, Gaurian, given by Professor Hoernle, has been adopted by Dr. Caldwell, I may venture to make use of it also. These languages, in order to make their origin, may also sometimes be termed the Neo-Sanskrit languages, as the Romance are spoken of for the same purpose as the Neo Latin or Novo-Latin Languages.

Type
Original Communications
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , August 1879 , pp. 287 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1879

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 288 note 1 The letters following the names show the abbreviations used for them.

page 292 note 1 Hoernle, , Calcutta Eeview, October, 1878.Google Scholar

page 293 note 1 Professor Hoernle's forthcoming comparative grammar will, I understand, give us a great deal of information about Ap. Pr.

page 294 note 1 Bartoli, , Letteratura Italiana (Firenze, 1878), p. 71.Google Scholar

page 307 note * M. and G. vad.

page 307 note † From tam; nome from retaining final vowel would not be an instance.

page 311 note * Jour from diurnum. It giorno.

page 314 note 1 Trumpp, , Sindhi Grammar, p. 54.Google Scholar