^{page 382 note 1} Doubtful, whether spelt with one or two t's.

^{page 382 note 2} Read Bhaţārkkaḥ.

^{page 382 note 3} tt doubtful.

^{page 382 note 4} The usual reading is pras'astatara; tara is wanting also, Ind. Ant. v. 205, plate i. 1. 7.

^{page 382 note 5} Read rājya.

^{page 382 note 6} Read tattvānāṃ.

^{page 383 note 1} The first letter looks like ra or Ka; the third may have been ņḍa, but only a small ņa is visible; the th of stha seems also uncertain.

^{page 383 note 2} va and jya uncertain.

^{page 383 note 3} I am unable to make out the reading of these fragmentary letters. The last ai is uncertain.

^{page 383 note 4} āṃ and the double s are rather doubtful, but the reading of the whole passage is obvious from a similar inscription of the same king, Ind, Ant. iv. 104 f., plate ii. 1. 5 ff.: Valabhyāṃ sva-bhāgineyî-param-opāsikā-Duḍḍā-kāritavihāra-pratiṣţhāpitānāṃ bhagavatām Stmyak-saṃbuddhānāṃ Buddhānāṃ, etc.

^{page 383 note 6} This reading is not quite certain.

^{page 384 note 1} Or, perhaps, I[hā=*]pi.

^{page 384 note 2} Read tāny=eva.

^{page 384 note 3} Though only a small portion of the letters saṃ and ba is visible, and something is wanting of the numeral signs of 10 and 7, the reading is quite certain.