Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:05:44.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Armenian Episcopacy in Mamluk Jerusalem in the Aftermath of the Council of Sis (1307)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2007

Extract

From the earliest days of Christianity in Armenia, Jerusalem was an important centre of pilgrimage, culture, and faith. An Armenian hierarchy free from the authority of the Imperial Greek church had existed in Jerusalem possibly from the time of Justinian and an Armenian episcopacy from the time of the Arab conquests. According to Armenian tradition, first recorded in M. Č‘amč‘ian's History of the Armenians, in 1311 Bishop Sargis of Jerusalem (sed. 1281–1313) dramatically changed the nature of that office, when he declared himself and his entire charge independent of both the spiritual overlordship of the Catholicossate of Sis and the political protection of the Armenian kingdom founded in Cilicia. The catalyst for the rupture was the Cilician Church's decision in favour of union with Rome taken with the encouragement of the Armenian monarchy at the Council of Sis in 1307. According to Č‘amč‘ian, Bishop Sargis, rejecting the Armenian kingdom's demands of obedience, turned to the Mamluk Sultan of Egypt and received from him an edict declaring that henceforth the Armenian bishop of Jerusalem would be able to exercise full Patriarchal rights, namely, the ability to appoint bishops and to use the red patriarchal seal to ratify documents.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* I would like to extend my gratitude to Professor Reuven Amitai of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem for his invaluable help with the translation of Arabic sources, his useful suggestions, and the pleasure of many fruitful discussions about Mongol-Mamluk relations in the thirteenth to fourteenth centuries. I would also like to thank the anonymous reader of this article who offered helpful and stimulating comments.